Search results for query: Mark of the beast

...Noe' that we are warned of: Matthew 24:37 - But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. The Mark of the Beast ties into all of this as Transhumanism. Yeah, alien invasions are absolutely terrifying to think about. I believe that the Litte Horn of...

According to Scripture, your claim that Noah, Lot, the flight to Egypt, and Revelation 3:10 prove a pre‑tribulation removal of the righteous ignores the fact that Jesus explicitly interprets the Noah‑Lot pattern as judgment falling on the wicked (“the flood came and took them all away,” Matthew...

...during the trib martyred...murdered. All that refuse the mark die. Every man woman and child that are not in the book, receive the mark of the Beast. The antichrist is given power over the saints, and murders them. They are seen in heaven as an innumerable number. The Bible declares that...

Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy...

Daniel 11–12: what the text actually says 1. The king of the north in Daniel 11:40 You say Daniel 11:40 is Octavian/Augustus. But Daniel 11:40–45 describes: “the king of the north” pushing at “him,” overflowing and passing over, entering “the glorious land,” Planting his palace between the...

I disagree. The phrase 'time of the end' precisely matches events of past history. Specifically, the time of the end began at the battles of Actium and Alexandria. It ended in 70 AD. The main players were Octavian, Mark Antony, Cleopatra and King Herod. That would be Octavian/Augustus. Look...

Your reply assumes that “rightly defining Biblical eschatology” means assembling a harmonized timeline from Daniel, Isaiah, Zechariah, Jesus, Paul, and Revelation. And you assume that Scripture does NOT harmonize nor is it meant to. An utterly preposterous assumption that defies the very...

Your reply assumes that “rightly defining Biblical eschatology” means assembling a harmonized timeline from Daniel, Isaiah, Zechariah, Jesus, Paul, and Revelation. But harmonization is not the same thing as exegesis. You are not deriving a timeline from the text; you are assembling a timeline...

...from the Father to the 144,000. The trumpets storyline is from the perspective of the 144,000 conquering the two beasts. The mark of the beast storyline is from the perspective of the saints remaining loyal to the Savior. And the fall of Babylon storyline is from the perspective of the...

All evidence from linguistics, archaeology, and Scripture shows that Aleph and Tav did not exist as concepts before writing. The sounds ʾ and t were part of early spoken Semitic languages, but letters cannot exist until a writing system exists, and the earliest Semitic writing (Proto‑Sinaitic)...

This is what you don't know & skipped long before any alphabet so all your testimony is going out the window! In the very beginning, before any letters were ever drawn or any alphabets were invented, Aleph and Tav were not letters at all—they were two spoken words representing the two most...

...and Chapter Seventeen. After I wrote this I remembered that Rev. 16:19 makes a similar comparison. a) Rev. 15:1-8 midpoint in the mark of the beast storyline JUDGMENT b) Chapter Sixteen judgment in the mark of the beast storyline JUDGMENT c) d) Rev. 17:1-18 fall of Babylon in the 3.5 year...

...supper continues and the first resurrection begins Tribulation Era b) Rev. 21:1-8 the midpoint parallel to Chapter Fifteen in the mark of the beast storyline Judgment Era a) Rev. 21:8-27 Rise of New Jerusalem the economy of God parallel to Chapter Sixteen in the mark of the beast storyline...

Why change it? Why change it or even need it changed? It clearly says sitting on a horse in Rev 19. It clearly says he is sitting on a cloud in Rev 14. BTW, it says nothing of wheat harvest in verse14. The jew is the fruit harvest. The church is grain. Rev 14;14 debunks a one coming theory...

...was another angel came out with another sickle and he harvested all of the grapes. (People who belonged to satan/those who take the mark of the beast. They where all smashed down into the wine press. This passage in 14 does not say Jesus came, left and came back. These are the things Jesus...

...forever. and one in the book of revelation that says Satan and His end times buddies (The Beast, anti christ, those who take the mark of the beast) will burn in Hell forever. The reason for this punishment is that those who take the mark, are responsible for the destruction of the church in...

One thing for sure, they are honest for the following: 1. Rejecting Jesus. 2. Embracing LGBT, even protecting pedophilia. 3. Hostile to Christians, spit to Christians in the streets.

When the antichrist/beast/son of perdition starts enforcing idolatry by beheading, people might figure it out. In fact, from 11/2-11/6, the first international noahide congress meets in Jerusalem. It's about the 'courts'. It's about to get biblical. John 16 2 They shall put you out of the...

Jesus taught a pretrib rapture . Acts 1 is against your model of one coming also. Rev 14:14 also reveals a one coming theory to be totally false.

...and with him the false prophet (Rev. 13:11) that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image (Rev. 13:12-18). These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. 21And the remnant...