Search results

I have always said I am not a Preterist and that I am a Historicist - you yourself commented on me saying that - so no idea where this changing/revealing view comes from :unsure:

Just want to add one more thing. Personally I do not care what date Revelation was written. So long as it was written before the events predicted and not after. Like they used to accuse the book of Daniel of being written after the events predicted took place, until they found an ancient copy of...

I ignore your posts because you have yet to post anything significant or anything that casts doubt on the Historic interpretation. I do wonder why you feel the need to spam me like some sort of Judas Virus though. Do you feel threatened by my beliefs ? If so I will expect more spam from you -...

And throw out all the secular Historical evidence also ? Nero was bloodthirsty he believed in killing and making entertainment out of his victims. Whereas Domitian was known for banishing political prisoner's and Christians that he called atheism. When he was assassinated September A. D. 96...

That AI needs sacking - that is not the Historic view 0 maybe it is the SDA church view but it is not the Historic view . Revelation 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. In its time Rome...

The faith of the Old Testament lives on in Jesus Christ - the Bible is one book - but Judaism is not the religion of the Old Testament like some people think - it is more Babylonian Talmud than anything else

They are not there - they are waiting for it to be rebuilt - I think they are at a kibbutz atm

I answered in post 288 :)

Well at least we agree on the Catholic Church - and a Reformed Church would close its doors on me - I am not reformed either :)

I have my doubts about him, he is called exceedingly great ? I don't think so. We learn about and see movies about people like Alexander the Great etc but did we learn about Antiochus in History class ? maybe in a Jewish school IDK I agree Most of the narrative is about the fourth Kingdom yes...

I think the three main religions of the world - Islam, Judaism, and Christianity (the ones that love war because they think it will rush the second coming) will bring the world to another world war, then either Christ will return at that time orrrrr He will have the nations defeated and true...

Does the C in your name stand for cardinal by any chance ? lol

No idea - If they believe everything has been fulfilled then we are living in the physical kingdom of God now with no more tears and no more sorrow etc which clearly isn't the case - but I am not a preterist so maybe they have an answer for that.

That seems very plausible to me I see the start of it as the first coming but also V 35 as the second - I guess that is where we differ, but that would not stop me understanding the rest of your position. I have posted my view on those verses before - I hold the Historist position - sorry :(

I see things nearing the end also - It might not be in my lifetime as I am knocking on a bit lol but in our sons and daughters time maybe. :) be

Such kind words from such a wise man - thank you :)

You sound just like my mother when she is patronising me lol - I am going to my mothers and make sure she has not acquired a computer recently :)

The little horn in chapter 7 I see as the Papacy - The one described in Dan 8:23 onwards I believe is Antiochus IV (not dogmatic on this though) but I also believe there is a "far" fulfilment with the Mohammedanism anti-Christ power that rose up. No to the future thing - we use the anti-Christ...

The Bible has the whole of Human History in it - it starts in the first book with paradise lost and ends in the last with paradise restored. Isaiah 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do...

The countless others statement was because you said it would be revealed to us - and that was to say it was - it was what the reformation was based upon and it is what gave us our Bibles in English and other tongues - the Papacy wanted it left in Latin. As for if I am wrong and if it is literal...