Search results

I think I see the problem. When I said the “latter” I was referring to the second covenant…..not Sinai.

I Don’t believe I suggested the commandments were abolished. What I said…..was the Moab covenant (Deuteronomy.1.1-5) was abolished and was/is the covenant spoken of in Hebrews. The Sinai Covenant (The Ten Commandments) are not the obsolete covenant mentioned in Hebrews. If it was misstated in...

It is very unfortunate that folks just don’t understand that Israel had been given two covenants in their journey from Egypt to the Promised Land (Deuteronomy 29:1). (Deuteronomy 1:1-5) shows Moses explaining the second covenant on the Plains of Moab forty years after the first covenant Israel...

.???

I have always been fond of nick names and try to give one to all my family members and attempt to offer something apropos. My grandchildren are pleased with their nick names I’ve given them (I think) and let me name them for your perusal….given according to their age (oldest first/ youngest...

O.K. This question will not affect anyone’s salvation….so we can disagree without igniting a firestorm. Blessings to your home and all within……

Yes….because of ignorance by translators recently emerging from 1000+ years of “Dark Ages”. Mt. Sinai is a mythical location. Even today historians cannot identify the mountain of the Covenant. Oh sure……some think they know…..but the Desert of Sinai is the proper name where Israel received the...

Deuteronomy 29:1 speaks of two separate Covenants in two separate locations separated by 40 years of wandering…..

The 613 commandments are not biblical……they are from the Babylonian Talmud. “Tractate Makkot 23 b” I would recommend further study…….

Actually…..Israel arrived in the DESERT of Sinai. The Mountain was Mt. Horeb. They were given the Law of Yahweh. That’s correct….. This is also correct……but the Aaronic Priesthood was not the Levitical Priesthood. This is also true. The mistake most folks make is assuming the Aaronic...

Actually……it is not. There are substantial differences between Yahweh’s Law and the Law of Moses. The Father’s intention with Israel was to make them a holy nation of priests (Exodus 19:5-6) and a Kingdom. Our Father’s Covenant did not require a separate Levitical Priesthood with all its...

I would still suggest…….more study.

This speaks of the Levitical Law (Hebrews 7:11-28) and not one other thing. If you notice….it speaks of a change in the law …….not an elimination. Hebrews 9 tells us further that the law under discussion required the blood of goats and calves (KJV) and the action of sprinkling the scroll and...

Since I first became drawn to the Word of our Father I have often pondered many hard to explain, difficult to understand and seemingly total contradictory positions presented to us by traditional biblical knowledge.. And eventually I came to understand that the big problem in all of this is...

I have never heard that phrase, “It is obsolete” regarding the Word of our Father. I would hope someday you might reconsider that position……

(Exodus 20:8) Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. This is called a “reminder” when The Father asked us to “remember” it…..

Why do you feel that the Passover Sabbath (Nisan 15) must coincide with the weekly Sabbath? Chapter and verses if it is not a problem? I would be very interested in your version of events. Thank you in advance……. I do rely on certain facts that are irrevocable in my opinion…..of course. We...

Here is what I must go by in the chronology. King Herod died in 4 bc. Yeshua had to have been born prior to that. I derive this data from world history and (Matthew 2:16-19).. Herod had directed all boys in Bethlehem under the age of two to be killed. The U.S. Naval observatory indicates...

I cannot find any place in Biblical History for instructions to follow the Catholic practice for Sunday observance…..or to discontinue the Father’s Sabbath requirement when He asked us to remember it. This was the only commandment He felt He should remind us about…….maybe since He knew it would...

Reading through various “Literal Translations” I do not find any mention of Apostles meeting on the first day of the week. I realize that most typical translations will show Paul (Acts 20:7) meeting on the first day of the week….but this is error. Most translations will italicize the word...