Search results

I am 100% sure that the coC has the truth and that the message heard there WILL save your soul unlike others of the aforementioned 40k. If your religious body teaches salvation based on belief only, it's false. And likewise, if your religious body teaches salvation without baptism, total...

For me, its a matter of truth and saving souls such as yours and those that follow false doctrines

The one that adheres strictly to biblical principles and teachings without interjection of influence of of man's doctrines or traditions. Ive found the coC to be that. There may be others, but if so, not many at all. Few there be that find it.

100% absolutely no, nor do most "Christian" religious groups, denominations, etc. Does God accept the multitude of "Christian" religious groups and "churches" all of which teach something different, believe and practice something different, have man-made doctrines etc? I'm absolutely certain the...

Yes. Read 1 Cor 7. 15But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.

We exercise free will constantly, but just because the ultimate outcome has already been determined by God and his foreknowledge, doesn't mean that free will has not been exercised by us. God just simply knows in advance, irrespective of our gyrations, what tfe outcome will be.

The doctrine of baptism stated, and restated, and again restated. Read and compare what the actual word of God says compared to what the achey breaky says. You THINK you're getting trolled because you don't understand. Goodbye

When they CLEARLY contradict them or alter them ad per the example I cited. Compare the REAL, actual word of God to the did ache, and yes, it aches.

Read the account of the conversion of the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8. He confessed with his mouth his belief in the Lord in response to Philip's preaching and then was immediately baptized.

Renunciation of the Lord as warned of in Hebrews.

What was actually created on day 1? Light

Is the did ache actually in the NT? If it isn't, (which it ain't), then it's not scripture nor inspired of God as is scripture.

Yes, English and a tiny bit of Spanish, and can somewhat understand English, Spanish, Polish, and Slavish

The falling of the Holy Ghost in Acts 2 on the 11 apostles net result and purpose was to establish the church as promised, 1st by convincing/converting the Jews, and then the Gentiles were brought in as recorded in Acts 10.

These so called doctrines in the did ache are not scripture however and in fact go against/alter scripture such as in case of baptismal principles which are clearly contrary to God's word.

Those afterwards that spoke in other tongues did so after the laying on of the apostle's hands, except for Cornelius and his in Acts 10, which falling of the Holy Ghost on them was unique and for a specific purchase as was the case in Acts 2; in both cases, the church was started,1st in...

It was the 11 apostles who spoke in tongues as recorded in Acts 2 on the day of Pentecost

Yes. Incoherent, chaotic, nonsensical babbling that no-one understands nor interprets, contrary to biblical principles as found in 1 Cor. I witnessed this first hand when I visited a penecostal assembly of God many, many, years ago when I was searching for truth before I became a Christian.

Ummmm. Believe what you like, eh?