Search results

Why do you believe the devil spoke the truth?

If you are drowning and you are thrown a rope, will you brag that you grabbed the rope and saved yourself? You will not. The credit goes to the one who gave you the rope. Because Jesus did not die for angels, He died for people

May I ask, what happened? Did you just not want to get married or did you never find a wife/husband? There are benefits to being single. Some people like being alone. God's lonely man.

True. Does your Israel of God include the Israel according to the flesh, who are now considered enemies of the gospel, but will turn to Christ at His return? It better

Ever read the Bible? The nations will be made an end of, not Israel.

Smart guy, he knows there are no civilians in Gaza. Most of the world doesn't. Because they don't know what Islam teaches. But soon the libtards will find out the hard way and already are finding it out in Europe. Enjoy the terrorist attacks, you voted for them!

Romans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned If you are a molinist you would then affirm people have libertarian free will, but the way God predestines things is by creating the world...

Would that be the same as the teaching of original sin? I have not looked into it much, but I do affirm the doctrine based on Romans 5.

Yes we can. Look into molinism, one plausible explanation that explains both free will and predestination/sovereignity. I think it does a decent job at it. The only downside of it is that it is not specifically mentioned in the Bible and is more of a philosophical construct, but consistent...

I do understand you would place it at 70AD... But once again. Resurrection did not occur then. So it is still applicable and not out of context as 1 Thessalonians 4:15-16 is the resurrection. What possessed you to get into this strange theology? All of Christianity has always viewed the return...

Question about the bold, why isn't this at the Lord's return? The Bible links it to the coming of Jesus: 1 Thessalonians 4:15-16

Your refusal to answer the question answers the question. It is the litmus test, as per the Scriptures: 2 Timothy 2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 Is it past or not? There will be no fruit in discussing Christian doctrine with a non-Christian. So I must know

I can and I have explained it. This generation meaning the generation that sees all these things listed occuring. You can keep high horsing but Christianity believes Jesus returns and resurrection is future. Even the amillenniallists believe that much!

Wait, you deny that the rapture is future? pre-mid or post? That means you are not a Christian. The rapture IS the resurrection. Same event, same time. Dead in Christ rise first. If you deny the rapture is future you deny the resurrection is future 2000 years plus, yup. Keep mocking it: 2...

No heaven and earth is heaven and earth. Its not an idiom at all to talk about a mosaic age. Revelation 21:1,3 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and...

Yup, really easy. You break it too, if you used this type of method for interpreting the Bible you would no longer even preach the gospel. Lets apply the consistent preterist method here: - The great commission was never given to you, it was given to the apostles only, remember as you said...

Easy debate against Don Preston. Light work. The preterist case is very very easy to defeat, both partial and full, they use the same arguments, the only difference is that the partial preterist is inconsistent. The Partial-preterist somehow sees Matthew 24:31 as past, yet 1 Thessalonians...

Now we know where you get all your confusion from. "Pastor Miano". I googled the poor lad and he seems to be a FULL preterist? Is that correct or am I misunderstanding his position? If he is indeed a full preterist he is NOT a Christian and is a heretic. Oh the guy seems to reject water...

And it is a bit unfair to think that Israel has been scattered, yet all the gathering promises refer to the gentiles who have not been scattered? Replacement theology is terrible.