Search results

Source: B.L. Highlighter, "Is Knowledge of the Original Languages Necessary For KJV Believers?" page 202. Is Knowledge of the Original Languages Necessary for KJV Believers? The difference between Βηθαβαρά and Βεθαβαρά should not be surprising. The Greek η (eta) is itself an e-type vowel and is...

[ See my next post to you for my refutation of your false assertions ]

I wonder sometimes if some of you are actually brainwashed by the Academy. Granted, I am not saying this was any kind of MK Ultra level type brainwashing. It would be class room and school style conditioning type tactics. However, regardless if this happened or not, ultimately, I believe this is...

Speaking of museums: We need one for the Westcott and Hort / Nestle and Aland Modern Bible Movement. Here are some possible names: #1. The Westcott & Hort Museum of Biblical Blunders. #2. The Westcott-Hort House of Horrors Museum. #3. The Westcott & Hort Slice & Dice Museum. #4. The Museum of...

What you declare as sarcasm, I take as praise. Granted, I believe the KJV is an English translation that is providential, and the original languages that underlie the KJV are the actual inspired words of God. As for NASA studying the KJV for hull design: While there is a strong chance nothing...

Nice try. But you are missing the fact that the KJV is unlike other previous translations in history in that it was: #1. The dominant translation in a world language (English) that was influential, had a positive impact globally, and broke denominational barriers within the Protestant world...

I tried my best and your not getting it. Moving on from talking to you (specifically). May God bless you. Tchau, Tchau. ....

You also fail to consider that God's word took time to be printed (1400s) and then in the 1500s it was starting to come together, and it was being refined then finally in 1600s, those copies of the original languages finally came together in one place . Before that it was scattered manuscript...

I already proved it. I gave you many reasons why the KJV is that standard. It's not some obscure translation sitting on a shelf that nobody uses or has never used. Vaticanus and Sinaiticus were virtually unused through a giant portion of church history. Again, Revelation 22:18-19 cannot be...

You don't get it. Family 35 while not based on the Critical Text used manuscripts to translate into English the "become" reading. Some poor sap out there is going to believe that Bible and it is going to affect their faith. In time, the Modern English Bibles can add the new NA 29 / UBS 6...

Again, that does not address the problem. How can God hold anyone accountable for adding or removing from His words if there is no set printed standard somewhere? That would be like a master who kicks a dog across the room for pooping on his carpets despite the fact that it has an...

You cannot know what the text says if you don't have a standard and if you are going off modern lexicons and modern scholars who have made many blunders over the years. They don't compare to the scholarship of the KJV Translators and their integrity. Try looking up their credentials some time...

Sorry. You are not the center stage of the debate. Obviously you must be familiar with the concept of how I can lead a horse to water but I cannot force it to drink. My repeating points to you that you don't accept will not help progress the conversation. It would be like I am talking to a...

I am not KJV-only or KJV-English only. I used to be. My position is KJV + Its Underlying Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. But you fail to see the importance of the KJV because without it, you are tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine by every new Modern English modern Bible that comes out or...

Again, you are not dealing with the problem. I believe the standard we have is the standardized KJV we have today and its underlying Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Why? Because again... you cannot have Revelation 22:18-19 be true if words change in God's word that is given to us today. See, the...

It is my attempted exit rebuttal speech with you and not with the discussion in general. I will still preach against the false Modern Bible Movement to others and its dangers. ....

First, I am not one who is going outside the authority of lexicons and is also supported by a native of Greece. Second, you would have to show why they are incorrect and use some kind of historic support for your interpretation or understanding. Meaning, is there any place in history where...

The Progression of Paul’s Argument in Galatians 2:16-20 Galatians 2:16: “Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law…”...

I want you to tell me how you can add or subtract from God's words if those words keep changing? Your logic is flawed. Just calling them variants does not erase the problem in that it is giving us a shape-shfiter text that affects people's faith and beliefs. Adding or subtracting from God's...

There is no point in any further discussion on this point because you keep repeating the same arguments that does not address the heart of the points I made that you are ignoring. Time for us to move on. You can side with a text that has these problems if that helps you to sleep at night. 1...