Search results

You have a nice copy and paste and nothing worry about. Btw, i love KJb

Where are typo in here? Thanks 😊

Thank you for the invitation

My general/ critical observation is that I failed to see such a comparison of related/ similar words during discussions and you are stating your view. Well anyway so much for this.:)

Exactly you are trying to persuade me but I choose not. I like comparing scripture with scripture but are we doing it? Umm...

You misread Stong. He's not really sure if it is. and then again jumping from another Gk word which is "ago". You are just trying to tweak it with a biased interpretation. The "bringing' of the people means not to drag but to lead, guide, or direct. For some info, 'bring ' in 1611 means to...

Correct me if I am wrong but you are quoting Strong's incorrectly. Strongs asserts only as "probably akin to haireō G138" which speaks likely but not certainly. Chances are when one quotes differently, it literally means a different thing. Here is your quote by the way: "for the word draw...

Yes, I posted the fact and you may have purposely done it to prove your point but perhaps in a biased way. The word “draw” has different nuances and it may mean a simple ‘traction’ that you are trying to point to and that God is active and men are passive. However, the word “draw” has yet...

Using Strong’s 1670 of the Gk. “helko” which is Thayer's definition could mean literally or figuratively, however, it is pointed out that in the case of John 6:44 is not to be interpreted literally but rather metaphorically considered as figurative language. See the definition No.2 2...

True, either they redefine or jump to the other topic and this is subtlety being cornered behind.:cool:

The fact that they differ means they are not the same :)

of course this is from not b4. It speaks in time and not eternity

Yes for eternity but not before the foundation of the world.

And, the Biblical Rufus was chosen in the Lord not for eternity. Romans 16:13 Salute Rufus chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine.

A biblical definition of the word ‘testify’ s in the immediate context following the phrase “bearing witness” v.27, thus we have the witness. The witness is to tell the truth about what he has seen firsthand. The role of the Holy Spirit is to attest to the truth and his disciples at the same...

John 15:26 KJV — But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me: John 15:27 KJV — And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning. Who shal testify or...

And yet it is the will of the Father to believe. Well, those who want to enter with their own efforts or their own ways or works cannot do so. The context saying of mere professions as many claim , hence qualified by Christ as workers of iniquity. What lesson being learned is that they have...

Well, correct if i am wrong, tge text us not about the drawing, illumination or conviction but testifying as the other passages would tell us. Thanks

Umm, you might try to re read the context. The given text is not what being said of what you are to convey. While it is true he is said to be a comforter, he is also the Spirit of truth, bearing witness as the disciples have to bear witness of what Christ did. To whom the disciples and the...

Not to be argumentative here but this is not what you have quoted as good proof text, 'afterall, trying' is not ' believing'. Big difference, unless you redefine faith as work. ;)