Search results

To all in this thread... Is "Evyaniy" a bot? Thumbs up if you think this is probably true. Thumbs down if you think it's probably not true.

Gee thanks, but, the Blue Letter Bible is not a manuscript. Could you please tell me which manuscript you turn to for an inerrant original language reading?

Thanks for your comments. Just kicking the tyres here... According to your understanding does "the law of Christ" permit a man to dress as a woman?

1st John 3:4 refers to God's Law. It includes commandments such as - "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (Lev 18:22) Hence, homosexuality is sin. And, I can assure you, neither the homosexual men of the unlawful marriage nor their child are permitted to...

Sooo... A man can now dress as a woman, as long as he has "faith" and is "always seeking grace and mercy"? I'm not trying to be contentious. I would just like to see a real world example of this schema you propose.

And that Man tells His people to keep His/God's commandments (Mat 5:17-19; Joh 14:15; 15:10; et al). No obedience = no relationship. "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate...

Thanks. I thought you might say that. Since your misuse of those Scriptures has already been adequately addressed I will ignore your response. What I'm asking for here is for the antinomians to explain the logic behind a supposed temporary abolition of God's Law. If, as Paul says, it is...

First, to be clear, I'm in full support of most of what you've said in this thread, but, looking at the words in red above, there is mention of sin offerings in Exo 29:14,36; 30:10. Right?

Hmmm. Yes, some profitable and some unprofitable servants.

Sooo, the Law IS the standard for righteousness for God's people in the past and in the future, but just not now?

Not my conversation, but, no.

"All things are lawful for me" literally means Paul considered the Law in all that he did. For example, do you believe it was lawful (ie. permissible [sic]) for Paul to commit sodomy? Paul didn't (Acts 25:8).

[Cough] What? Do you still have that page in your Bible with 2nd Tim 3:16? And.. [head shaking] the Jerusalem council were NOT lead of the Spirit?

True. But not terribly helpful in assisting the Christian in making moral judgement. For example, some "churches" now permit gay marriage. Are they under grace?

Um... that's because you're absolutely right. To practically everything you've posted here I can say - Amen!

Thanks for your reply. Much appreciated. Naturally I've read and believe the same Scripture that you've quoted, but that isn't answering my question. I'll try another way. Christ observed the Lord's Passover with His disciples (Luke 22). During the Passover Christ said that He will eat the...

Pretty sound reasoning. But the heart can be deceptive. It can be deceived. If the Law is written in your heart, as you say, and you need not look at the Ten Commandments in Exodus 20 then the following question wont offend... Do you remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy?

Paul, the Apostle to the gentiles, needed the Law (Acts 25:8). Why wouldn't you? If you truly are walking in Love then it's the Law which will prove your righteousness ahead of the judgement.

Oh, Amen.

Finally! Somebody who sees that the old covenant is not equal to the Law. I have found that it is rare for Christians to see this.