Search results

Modern scholarship? I could care less what anyone thinks unless it is based on objective facts. What gave you that idea?

Hi Bible_Highlighter, Secrecy? No, you seem studious, it is always best if one sees for themselves. I posted the issue to @OMC He also thought I was raising up the controversy in respect to the genitive case of πίστεως Ἰησοῦ It is nice that you see the importance of correctly translating that...

Right and therein our works which are done through our union with Him are righteous, we are justified, rendered, shown to be righteous. Which we Can not be if it were not for the faith of Christ being lived out through us. Here is Gal 2:16 with what we just discussed in mind, "But knowing that...

One does not need to learn, for not all have the capability. But all can be familiar and look things up. So as we move forward with the same understanding of what you presented, how does the faith of Christ play into this. And should we also consider εἰς in the clause "εἰς Χριστὸν Ἰησοῦν...

The phrase literally means "if not". Except works and unless but they are translations. The text reads, "But knowing that a person is not justified by the works of the law, if not by faith of Jesus Christ." In other words, works do not make anyone righteous if not through the faith of...

Yes it is. As a matter of fact most translations repeat the same error. If you have some thing for me to look at, type it out here please. I am not interested in reading anything unless you present it here. However I see where you are heading and The Genitive Case is not the issue.

Nice, but what of ἐὰν μὴ

The Gospel is clear in most translations but some text are in error Translations are untrustworthy. The fact that that They disagree in a lot of places is proof of that. And some are not translations in some text though they claim to be. Are you a student of the Greek? If so, maybe you can see...

Galatians 2:16 for one.

Hebrew and Greek do not. Translations do

All translations of the Bible have mistakes. All not some. We should want to know what they are.

I am using the BDAG and Thayer unabridged for the most part. And the BDB and Benner's AHLB. Not so sure I agree with your assessment. Proof please

With the Greek and Hebrew/ Aramaic Manuscripts available to us today in Interlinear form with Lexicons we no excuse to not delve into them in Faith to see for ourselves what translations are true

You haven't said anything. It is not my standard, words it is God’s. You posted your example of a man's failings as your example. And then your own thoughts and surmising when we are to be living out of every word that preceded out of the mouth of God. When given a thus saith the Lord you answer...

You haven't said anything. You posted your example of a man's failings as your example. God said through Paul forget those things that behind move forward to the high calling that is in Christ Jesus in respect to being perfected. Anything else is of unbelief and will toss you like the waves...

Heb 10:26 is being said in the present continual sense. A way of life not an occasional instance.

Your words do not address what God has said. The Spirit saith, The knowledge of the truth is that Jesus blood cleanses our Conscience, who we are from dead works, sin. Acts that cause death, so we can serve the living God. (Heb 9:14) For the blood of bulls and goats could never take away sin...

Yep, The knowledge of the truth is that Jesus blood cleanses our Conscience, who we are from dead works, sin. Acts that cause death, so we can serve the living God. (Heb 9:14) For the blood of bulls and goats could never take away sin. (Heb 10:4) But He in these last days by the sacrifice of...

Says nowhere in the Hebrews

So your example is a man. Maybe keep your eyes on Jesus?