Search results

  1. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    Dragon speech.
  2. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    The exact answer I would expect from a dragon.
  3. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    What? no scripture to back up these claims? shocking.
  4. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    Christ is King of kings right now. Scripture is explicit about that (Rev. 17:14; 19:16). He is seated at the right hand of God right now (Ps. 110:1; Acts 2:33-36). So the question is not whether Christ reigns. The question is whether every aspect of His reign has reached its final...
  5. OMC

    looking for help reconciling the Sabbath with common observation?

    I agree that the apostles had no authority to change God's commands and that Christ alone possesses such authority. My question is not whether Christ could change the Sabbath. Of course He could. My question is where Scripture tells us that He did. Your argument establishes Christ's authority...
  6. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    Brother, Please understand that I am not trying to anger you or cause issues, the difficulty I have with that reading is that Zechariah 13 does not naturally stop in the first century and stay there. Zechariah 12, 13, and 14 read as a connected prophecy. In Zechariah 12:9 the Lord says, "I...
  7. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    Israel's blindness is temporary (Rom. 11:25). Israel's future salvation is promised (Rom. 11:26-27). Their election remains because of the fathers (Rom. 11:28-29). Zechariah describes a future repentance, cleansing, and restoration (Zech. 12-14). Believing Jews and Gentiles are already one...
  8. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    I don't think Revelation 19 allows me to place the entire chapter in the first century. The reason is that the rider on the white horse is described as the One called "The Word of God" (Rev. 19:13), the One who "shall rule them with a rod of iron" (Rev. 19:15), and "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF...
  9. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    I agree completely that Christ will judge heretics, false teachers, hypocrites, and workers of iniquity. The passages you quoted prove that. What they do not prove is that everyone who disagrees with your prophetic conclusions belongs in those categories.
  10. OMC

    looking for help reconciling the Sabbath with common observation?

    "Scripture teaches the Sabbath was changed to Sunday," requires a text that actually says it.
  11. OMC

    exporting

    One thing your friend may want to focus on is finding buyers through channels that do not require supplier registration fees. Many U.S. importers, wholesalers, and small retail chains buy through direct relationships rather than paid supplier directories. Since Sialkot is well known for...
  12. OMC

    Man imputed Jesus with sin on the cross, not God.

    Of course the persecution, insults, and false accusations were sins committed against Christ. That's not the issue. The issue is that Isaiah does not say: "He bore the insults of many." or "He bore the false accusations of many." He says: "He shall bear their iniquities" (53:11). "He bare the...
  13. OMC

    looking for help reconciling the Sabbath with common observation?

    Notice what you've done here. You've moved from saying Scripture teaches a Sabbath change to saying Scripture supports a theological framework in which a Sabbath change makes sense. Those are not the same claim. You say the Sabbath changed because Christ inaugurated a new creation through His...
  14. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    You are the one who accuses folks of these things not me.
  15. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    What I said is that if a doctrine requires multiple inferential steps, then those steps should be demonstrated from Scripture rather than assumed. There is a difference between saying, "I have not seen sufficient biblical evidence to be certain," and saying, "I have not studied the issue." The...
  16. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    Refusing to claim certainty where Scripture has not explicitly spoken is not lukewarmness. It is caution. I have repeatedly affirmed the return of Christ, the resurrection, the gathering of the saints, the final judgment, and God's faithfulness to His promises. The fact that I refuse to...
  17. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    Certainty is not the issue. The issue is whether the certainty is grounded in what the text actually says. Hymenaeus and Philetus were condemned because they taught that "the resurrection is past already" (2 Tim. 2:18). Paul identified a specific doctrinal error and showed why it was...
  18. OMC

    False teaching by separating Scripture from Scripture

    I would say the Holy Spirit is the source of every act of obedience, every fruit of righteousness, and every genuine victory over temptation. But the presence of those victories does not mean the believer has attained meaningful mastery over indwelling sin in this life. The war remains until...
  19. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    My view is not built around the labels pre-trib, mid-trib, post-trib, preterist, or otherwise. My conviction is that Christ will return, the dead in Christ will be raised, and believers will be gathered to Him (1 Thess. 4:16-17). I also believe that the resurrection, the gathering of the...
  20. OMC

    Replacement theology? Yes or No.

    You are not answering my position, you are creating one for me and then attacking it.