Search results

What’s the point? Who knows whether what’s written is truth? Truth is subjective to you. Telling me to study how the Bible came to exist is also subjective, because whatever I find can still be accepted or disregarded based on what you personally believe is true. And I'm already well aware of...

Then truth is subjective and there's no way to figure out what is true. There's no point in studying scripture because you can't trust what God fearing people said to write it down. So who knows what salvation really is, because there's nothing we can rely on for truth. And if you say God will...

Do me a favor and please don't patronize me. It's incredibly rude. You can disagree with me, it's fine, but patronizing is going to get you no where. Do you talk to everyone like this? Someone disagrees with you and you talk down to them and assume they aren't studying scripture and get their...

We are still supposed to keep the law. It's God's law and it isn't temporary. But since you think the book of Hebrews is incorrect, there's no point in continuing this discussion. I like to follow scripture, not debate that it's wrong somehow. But you are free to think there are parts of the...

So you're saying the book of Hebrews is wrong? That sacrifices never took away sins? I'd be careful going down that road...

All commands are necessary for salvation, but God gives you grace and mercy for not following all of them. Every command has a benefit and in the case of the dietary rules, the benefits are health wise. God was literally just teaching what is food vs what isn't food. You should look up instances...

Okay, I wanted to make sure because it sounded like that was your stance. So essentially, you're a dispensationalist when it comes to salvation and Cameron is arguing against it. He's saying salvation has been the same throughout history. I actually agree with Cameron. In Ezekiel 40-48, it...

It's the idea that there are blocks of time where things are different. So, it's like saying, in Moses's time, salvation was different, to after Christ's time. Dispensationalists view blocks of time being different depending on the era, and that can go into several different topics but I...

Am I correct in assuming you're a dispensationalist when it comes to salvation?

I stated people using it and don't list it as AI and try and pass it off as their own writings. My frustration is conversing with an AI and not an actual person. But in this scenario, I stated I was using it so maybe they'd understand my point better since I couldn't figure out another way to...

Respectfully, sacrifices in the old testament weren't for forgiveness of sin. They're regarded as "offerings" which is why theres multiple different kinds. Hebrews even says that they never took away sin.

@HeIsHere Why is that funny? I was being heart felt... Geeze... :rolleyes:

I hope its explanation clarified where I'm coming from. I'm very fact based in a lot of my explanations, and sometimes its hard for me to pivot into another way to explain what I mean. So I hope you didn't get offended by my use of it, just, figured maybe it would explain it in another way...

I did not. My stance has always been that we have the ability to become sinless through Christ and His work in us.

Correct. So with His indwelling, perfection is obtainable.

Fairly noted :)

That's the point of the holy spirit. Since God is perfect with the Holy Spirit indwelling, that means we can be refined to perfection. Adam and Eve started out as perfect. So the option to go back to that state with the Holy Spirit isn't off limits.

Since Christ said his power came from the Father, that means Christ can be our 100% perfect human example that we can be perfect. It's obtainable.

I don't really know how else to say it because I highlighted the words that I'm zeroing in on and explained it. So in this instance, I'm going to use AI because maybe it can explain my point better. ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ What I understand her argument to be is...

@Cameron143 @Freed18 Just a perspective, but it seems like you both agree on the premise, but disagree with specific word choices. Cameron, you essentially repeated the concept that Freed said just with different wording. I just wanted to throw that out there because it seems like you're...