Search results for query: g726

...dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens."] Nothing about "helium," LOL! And a "SNATCH [G726]" doesn't even require a "floating" upward. :D ____________ @Cameron143 , I've pointed out the texts (and their differences)... but I'm...

Paul, when he used that word "departure [G359 - analysis ]" (2Tim4:6), he was referring to his death (per context). However, "rapture [G726 - harpagēsometha ]" (1Thess4:17), when the entire corporate "Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" will be "SNATCHed-up/-away]" at once (in ONE "snatch-action"), that...

...[His earthly designation], as I've been pointing out); (so... is she saying she does NOT believe we ['the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY'] will be "G726 - SNATCHed - harpagēsometha" ? Can she even identify "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" in Scripture?); --(at the 3:36-3:40-min mark) she says...

...at this Rev12 MID-trib CONTEXT, but PRIOR TO THAT (and prior to "the beginning of birth PANGS" / SEALS). [Jesus Himself was not "SNATCHED [G726]" up to Heaven...] Everything from Matt24:4 onward, is what will take place FOLLOWING "our Rapture". "The beginning of birth PANGS" are not...

...one") into ONE PLACE upon the earth (TO JERUSALEM; Compare "GREAT" trumpet, in these two passages); It has ZERO to do with "our SNATCH [/rapture G726]" Up to the time Jesus spoken His Olivet Discourse (and INCLUDING it), Jesus had NOT YET spoken ANYTHING regarding the Subject of "our...

...^ is contrary to all of the biblical evidence stating otherwise (regarding "us" / "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY"... and "our Rapture [/ SNATCH; G726]"... which pertains SOLELY TO "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" and not to all other saints of all OTHER time-periods: not to OT saints, not to...

"harpagēsometha ἁρπαγησόμεθα [Strong's G726]" is actually a biblical word / concept... and thus worthy of study and discussion. :) Ezekiel 13... a completely distinct concept being covered there... "Rapture [harpagēsometha ἁρπαγησόμεθα - Strong's G726]" was not promised to Israel; ...only...

...to all other saints of all OTHER time-periods... not to OT saints, not to Trib saints, not to MK-age saints [same way that "RAPTURE / SNATCH [G726]" pertains SOLELY TO "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" and not other saints of OTHER time-periods, same); --I could go on... but I know people...

...(for clarity): I believe there will be people who will be coming to faith in Christ FOLLOWING "our Rapture," when they are IN the Trib yrs--"our Rapture [/SNATCH - G726]" does not pertain to them... they will never "lift off" the earth, but will be PRESENT there, upon His RETURN to the earth...

...Yes, those saints / believers / righteous / wise (located on the earth, when He will RETURN there) will ENTER the earthly MK age (i.e. they are indeed "saved" persons), they just aren't the "Bride / Wife," see. (and they never "lift off" the earth, as WE WILL do! [in our "G726 SNATCH" =) ])

...period of Judgments) unfolds upon the earth, commencing with "the man of sin be revealed" (i.e. Seal #1)... Hence the reason for the "SNATCH [G726]"! and the wording of: "the One delivering us out-from THE WRATH COMING" 1Th1:10 [I'm one who also sees "the man child" / "the male [G730]"...

I was pointing out that this word ^ is not in the Matthew 24 text... nor in the Mark 13 text like you suggested it is: The Greek word for "caught-up" [Strong's G726 - harpagēsometha - "snatch"] is NOT in this text... *you* are INJECTING it INTO this text.

You are INJECTING this word (in blue) INTO this text (which word is not there). ["caught-up" [Grk harpagēsometha - "snatch" (Strong's G726)... is nowhere to be found in these contexts (His Olivet Discourse)]

...in their budget to act out every last detail of the matter, when the filmmaker's intention is to just depict the overall point); --the word "G726 - harpagēsometha / harpazo" (i.e. "SNATCH") doesn't necessarily carry the MEANING of "floating upward" or "ascending [visibly in the sight of...

...the children of Israel." At no time during Jesus' First Advent (including after His resurrection) was He ever said to be "caught-up/SNATCHED [G726]"... (Scripture uses OTHER words, but not THIS "G726 [SNATCH]" word, to speak of His going up to Heaven [to God].) "he was received up...

...to you] pre-wrath [per your viewpoint]... but somehow, also according to you, NOT "TO HEAVEN"... How do you explain this seeming discrepancy?? Because it is a big one, from what I can tell!) [for the readers: FTR, I do NOT see this Rev11 passage as a "rapture [G726 - SNATCH]" passage]

...nowhere indicates it is "TO HEAVEN" (as its destination-location)? [note to readers: I don't believe Rev11 speaks anywhere of a "rapture [G726]" event... the "2W" will ASCEND up to Heaven (not be "SNATCHED [G726]"); and I believe there will be ONLY ONE "G726 - SNATCH" event... not two...

...of the Church which is His body WHO'VE DIED before that point, who will indeed be "bodily resurrected" just prior to our being "caught up [G726] TOGETHER... to the meeting of the Lord IN THE AIR"]; but in the verses I'm bringing forward at the moment, these in particular speak only of that...

...such... when nothing temporal and seen is... seen. lol Secondly, I'm not able to figure out what *you* seem to be referring by "rapture [G726]" (when you say it will happen "on the last day") where you then INCLUDE "the dead [unsaved]" of all times as ALSO standing before this throne: Are...

There is a difference in meaning between the two distinct words G386 (from G450) and that of G726 (they do NOT have the "same meaning"): --G386 - anastasis "ἀνάστασις anástasis, an-as'-tas-is; from G450; a standing up again, i.e. (literally) a resurrection from death (individual, genitive case...