Search results for query: daniel 9

CONSIDER: --Matthew 24:29-31 (the CONTEXT of the verses you are referencing ^ ) is PARALLEL TO the passage in... --Isaiah 27:9, 12-13 (see WHO, and TO WHERE they are gathered, and IN WHAT MANNER they are gathered, etc)... [note that the Isa (27:9 "who") passage CORRESPONDS ALSO with both...

I did not say that "the Marriage" itself takes place "on the earth"... ... 1Th4:17 says (re: the time we are caught up [G726]), "SO [/in this manner] shall we ever be WITH [G4862 - UNIONed-with] the Lord"... --"the MARRIAGE9 itself pertains SOLELY to the [presently] "betrothed" A CHASTE...

Per Scripture itself, the "IT" in your sentence (referencing that which will not over take believers "as a thief in the night"--1Th5's context) is not "the return of Christ" (as many suppose--or in any form one would prefer to surmise [as in your view--the 70ad events])... ... but rather, as...

I don19t confuse the two. The first beast (its "mouth"--i.e. individual-person aspect, aka "man of sin"/"antichrist") correlates to same as spoken of in Daniel 7:20b,21 (compare v.21 "made war with the saints and prevailed against them" for example to that of Rev13:[1,]5-7 "it was given unto him...

Right, but didn29t you ALSO say that's when "the wedding feast / supper of the Lamb" also takes place?? It seems you said BOTH take place AFTER the Trib. [I'm explaining why the text itself does not reflect such a notion. Nor do the "illustrations" in the various related texts] Revelation...

To be as clear as possible, not "more than one" RAPTURE" (or, 39OUR episynagoges UNTO HIM"); but "more than one" gathering of saints, yes: the one spoken of in Matt24:29-31 / Isaiah 27:9,12-13 [/Rom11:27/Dan9:24] (at the "GREAT" trumpet) is a completely DISTINCT gathering from that of our...

From how I am reading what "GRACE_ambassador" wrote in his post, I don't believe he said "NO saint will suffer wrath49; instead, he said "The Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" is who was (in particular) promised not to suffer wrath (1Th5:9; 1Th1:10, etc)... not all other saints of all OTHER time...

I'm saying "the GREAT tribulation" commences at the MID-point of the 7 yrs (Dan12:1-4's reference-point ["AT THAT TIME"]), when 1260 days are yet remaining to Christ's Second Coming to the earth (Rev19); i.e. the day-amounts that Dan12:6-7 refer to (same as in Dan7:25[,27] and others...

This Daniel passage (vv.1-4) are referring to the MID-trib point in time(+), and verse 3b tells what the WISE of them (that is, the WISE of the nation of Israel [v.10 also]) will GO ON to DO: 59turn many to righteousness". These are "still-living"/ALIVE/MORTALS doing this (IN the TRIB yrs!)...

...- "6. Other idioms are: bring to life (properly drop young) Isaiah 26:19 (figurative); present supplication Jeremiah 38:26; Jeremiah 42:9; Daniel 9:18, 20 (all with לִפְנֵי); — on both compare Qal 6." [see below, for that] [and] "6. Other idiomatic uses are: לְמִשְׁכָּב נ׳ take to one's...

In Ezekiel 37, it is not a physical/bodily resurrection from the dead. Same as is being explained in Hosea 5:14-6:3 (also about Israel)... ...and same as in Isaiah 26:13-21,17-19... ...and same as in Daniel 12:1-4 (not v.13)... ...and same as in Romans 11:15[.25,27]... NONE of these...

I'd have to refresh my memory by reading it again myself... but taking what you say here (if this is indeed the case that these two sentences are placed one after the other in that text), let69s put the two sentences together (and then I'll explain what I'm seeing... what I believe the point is...

YES! The "69 Weeks" [total, to that point] were concluded on this very day ^ ... ... the day when Jesus SAID the Lk19:41-44 thing [read it] and DID the Zech 9:9 thing... BOTH having to do with "the city" / "Jerusalem" (i.e. the Dan9:24 time-prophecy... ["... are determined upon THY [Daniel79s]...

Yeah, but if people want to think Daniel was resurrected in the Matthew 27 crowd (of the sampling of OT saints), then they can be satisfied that any sequence issues supplied in the texts can be glossed over as merely "unimportant words," and stick with their own "stab-and-grab" method of reading...

@Thunderrr-mental 's Post #953 (page 48), where you asked me: Yes. I've posted probably over a hundred posts on that (lol)... To be brief here in this post (but you can find more in my old posts): --Matt13:24 (subject) is "the kingdom OF THE heavenS" (earthly located)--the time-frame is...

I apologize for missing this post of yours (Post #782, page 40), which you had addressed to me. Yes, I've done a study of it. In my Post #260 of this thread, I had written a small blurb about this section of Dan12 (vv.1-4), by saying: 89John 6:39,40 is speaking of two distinct matters which...

Notice how Peter here ^ does not use the definite article (90the91) when referring to us as 92temple93... he says instead, 94an holy temple95 ( or just 96holy temple97 with no definite article 98the99)-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/eph/2/21/p0/t_concif_1099021 ; and neither does Paul, when...

^ @Thunderrr-mental , No, we are not in "the great tribulation," as the "abomination [singular] of desolation [singular]" that both Jesus and Daniel in Dan12:11 spoke of, HAS NOT YET TAKEN PLACE (it WILL take place, commencing about 3.5 yrs [and lasting only that long] before Daniel and all OT...

...the abomination of desolation [shall be brought] into the temple: even unto the consummation of the time shall the desolation be complete. Daniel 9:27 Now three years and six months constitute the half-week." --Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.25.4 - https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103525.htm...

Yeah, that would be really weird (...to think that). lol And yet, Paul refers to "the temple of God" when he references the "man of sin" in 2Th2:4b and what he will DO and say there... and the wording in 2Th2:4a corresponds with those found in Daniel 11:36a (in the section of Daniel covering...