Search results for query: daniel 9

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 9
  1. T

    70 weeks of Dan 9.

    "Seventy sevens [a unique 'timing' wording] ARE DETERMINED UPON thy [Daniel's] people, AND UPON thy [Daniel's] holy city..." - Dan9:24 --69 of those "sevens" were concluded precisely on the very day that Jesus RODE into Jerusalem (fulfilling Zech9:9) and SAID the words He spoke in Luke...
  2. T

    There will be no Rapture!!!

    I disagree, and will try to explain why: --the text (Rv3:10) states that "the hour of the trial / temptation9 shall "come upon all the world, TO TRY THEM THAT DWELL UPON THE EARTH"; --The part of 2Th2:4 (I put in RED, v.4a) is what the Tribulation period (7 yrs) STARTS OUT with; THEN the...
  3. T

    There will be no Rapture!!!

    Three things come to mind: 1) the Matthew 27:52 text states, "...MANY bodies of the saints which slept arose"--it does NOT say all did... (and they went into the city and appeared to many, v.53--which I believe is told to us by way of *contrast* to what Jesus Himself did that very day...
  4. T

    There will be no Rapture!!!

    CONSIDER: --Matthew 24:29-31 (the CONTEXT of the verses you are referencing ^ ) is PARALLEL TO the passage in... --Isaiah 27:9, 12-13 (see WHO, and TO WHERE they are gathered, and IN WHAT MANNER they are gathered, etc)... [note that the Isa (27:9 "who") passage CORRESPONDS ALSO with both...
  5. T

    Revelation: A Cyclical View

    I did not say that "the Marriage" itself takes place "on the earth19... ... 1Th4:17 says (re: the time we are caught up [G726]), "SO [/in this manner] shall we ever be WITH [G4862 - UNIONed-with] the Lord"... --"the MARRIAGE" itself pertains SOLELY to the [presently] "betrothed" A CHASTE...
  6. T

    Revelation: A Cyclical View

    Per Scripture itself, the "IT" in your sentence (referencing that which will not over take believers "as a thief in the night29--1Th5's context) is not "the return of Christ" (as many suppose--or in any form one would prefer to surmise [as in your view--the 70ad events])... ... but rather, as...
  7. T

    Mat 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

    I don't confuse the two. The first beast (its "mouth"--i.e. individual-person aspect, aka "man of sin"/"antichrist39) correlates to same as spoken of in Daniel 7:20b,21 (compare v.21 "made war with the saints and prevailed against them" for example to that of Rev13:[1,]5-7 "it was given unto him...
  8. T

    Are you pre-Trib, mid-Trib, or post-Trib?

    Right, but didn't you ALSO say that's when "the wedding feast / supper of the Lamb" also takes place?? It seems you said BOTH take place AFTER the Trib. [I'm explaining why the text itself does not reflect such a notion. Nor do the "illustrations49 in the various related texts] Revelation...
  9. T

    Are you pre-Trib, mid-Trib, or post-Trib?

    To be as clear as possible, not "more than one" RAPTURE" (or, "OUR episynagoges UNTO HIM"); but "more than one" gathering of saints, yes: the one spoken of in Matt24:29-31 / Isaiah 27:9,12-13 [/Rom11:27/Dan9:24] (at the "GREAT" trumpet) is a completely DISTINCT gathering from that of our...
  10. T

    Are you pre-Trib, mid-Trib, or post-Trib?

    From how I am reading what 59GRACE_ambassador" wrote in his post, I don't believe he said "NO saint will suffer wrath"; instead, he said "The Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" is who was (in particular) promised not to suffer wrath (1Th5:9; 1Th1:10, etc)... not all other saints of all OTHER time...
  11. T

    When God gathers Israel into the land of Israel.

    I'm saying "the GREAT tribulation" commences at the MID-point of the 7 yrs (Dan12:1-469s reference-point ["AT THAT TIME"]), when 1260 days are yet remaining to Christ's Second Coming to the earth (Rev19); i.e. the day-amounts that Dan12:6-7 refer to (same as in Dan7:25[,27] and others...
  12. T

    When God gathers Israel into the land of Israel.

    This Daniel passage (vv.1-4) are referring to the MID-trib point in time(+), and verse 3b tells what the WISE of them (that is, the WISE of the nation of Israel [v.10 also]) will GO ON to DO: "turn many to righteousness". These are "still-living"/ALIVE/MORTALS doing this (IN the TRIB yrs!)...
  13. T

    When God gathers Israel into the land of Israel.

    ...- "6. Other idioms are: bring to life (properly drop young) Isaiah 26:19 (figurative); present supplication Jeremiah 38:26; Jeremiah 42:9; Daniel 9:18, 20 (all with לִפְנֵי); — on both compare Qal 6.79 [see below, for that] [and] "6. Other idiomatic uses are: לְמִשְׁכָּב נ׳ take to one's...
  14. T

    When God gathers Israel into the land of Israel.

    In Ezekiel 37, it is not a physical/bodily resurrection from the dead. Same as is being explained in Hosea 5:14-6:3 (also about Israel)... ...and same as in Isaiah 26:13-21,17-19... ...and same as in Daniel 12:1-4 (not v.13)... ...and same as in Romans 11:15[.25,27]... NONE of these...
  15. T

    June 10th, 1967

    I'd have to refresh my memory by reading it again myself... but taking what you say here (if this is indeed the case that these two sentences are placed one after the other in that text), let's put the two sentences together (and then I'll explain what I'm seeing... what I believe the point is...
  16. T

    TEMPLE......TO BE OR NOT TO BE....THAT IS MY QUESTION!!!!!

    YES! The "69 Weeks" [total, to that point] were concluded on this very day ^ ... ... the day when Jesus SAID the Lk19:41-44 thing [read it] and DID the Zech 9:9 thing... BOTH having to do with "the city89 / 90Jerusalem91 (i.e. the Dan9:24 time-prophecy... [92... are determined upon THY [Daniel93s]...
  17. T

    TEMPLE......TO BE OR NOT TO BE....THAT IS MY QUESTION!!!!!

    Yeah, but if people want to think Daniel was resurrected in the Matthew 27 crowd (of the sampling of OT saints), then they can be satisfied that any sequence issues supplied in the texts can be glossed over as merely 94unimportant words,95 and stick with their own 96stab-and-grab97 method of reading...
  18. T

    TEMPLE......TO BE OR NOT TO BE....THAT IS MY QUESTION!!!!!

    @Thunderrr-mental 98s Post #953 (page 48), where you asked me: Yes. I99ve posted probably over a hundred posts on that (lol)... To be brief here in this post (but you can find more in my old posts): --Matt13:24 (subject) is "the kingdom OF THE heavenS" (earthly located)--the time-frame is...
  19. T

    TEMPLE......TO BE OR NOT TO BE....THAT IS MY QUESTION!!!!!

    I apologize for missing this post of yours (Post #782, page 40), which you had addressed to me. Yes, I've done a study of it. In my Post #260 of this thread, I had written a small blurb about this section of Dan12 (vv.1-4), by saying: "John 6:39,40 is speaking of two distinct matters which...
  20. T

    TEMPLE......TO BE OR NOT TO BE....THAT IS MY QUESTION!!!!!

    Notice how Peter here ^ does not use the definite article ('the') when referring to us as "temple"... he says instead, "an holy temple109 ( or just 'holy temple' with no definite article 'the')-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/eph/2/21/p0/t_concif_1099021 ; and neither does Paul, when...