Search results

Tell ya what...I will try to accept the trinity concept if you can show me in the BIBLE where they baptized in the titles!! After all, I have Paul (the man who wrote 2/3 of the New testament) baptizing in the Name of Jesus. And if I was a betting man, seeing how Paul baptized Jesus NAME, not...

The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics: As to Matthew 28:19, it says: It is the central piece of evidence for the traditional (Trinitarian) view. If it were undisputed, this would, of course, be decisive, but its trustworthiness is impugned on grounds of textual criticism, literary...

"The Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius: Eusebius was the Church historian and Bishop of Caesarea. On page 152 Eusebius quotes the early book of Matthew that he had in his library in Caesarea. According to this eyewitness of an unaltered Book of Matthew that could have been the original...

The Catholic University of America in Washington, D. C. 1923, New Testament Studies Number 5: The Lord's Command To Baptize An Historical Critical Investigation. By Bernard Henry Cuneo page 27. "The passages in Acts and the Letters of St. Paul. These passages seem to point to the...

The Jerusalem Bible, a scholarly Catholic work, states: "It may be that this formula, (Triune Matthew 28:19) so far as the fullness of its expression is concerned, is a reflection of the (Man-made) liturgical usage established later in the primitive (Catholic) community. It will be...

The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: "The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century."

You have no idea who or what I am. But one thing is definite, you are judging me, when I have provided factual scripture to show the FIRST CHURCH did NOT baptize in your bastardized trinity!! And the TORAH, which is 3,000 years OLDER than the Bible you use, claims Elohim means singular as in...

Nah, it reeks of butthurt people who are comfortable in mommy and daddy's tradition, and everyone else must be wrong!!

Yes I am 100%

It's their OWN SOURCE (Catholics) that claim to have changed Matthew 28:19!! Tell me oh dim lit one, IF Christ actually commanded us to baptize in the trinity, WHY in the Book of Acts we find BOTH Paul and Peter baptizing in the NAME of JESUS? Why would they not follow the orders by Christ...

You sound BUTTHURT in your responses!! Try exlax, it will help you get past your denial that the Hebrews know who God is, and you obviously don't have a clue!!

HAHAHAHAHA, why would I want to be blind like YOU and your faith in a 3 person God? I used the actual TORAH, you know, the same set of scrolls by which Christ Himself quoted from? I find it interesting that Christ would use such a scroll tied to the Hebrew people believing that ELOHIM meant...

Here is a clear example of Paul baptizing in NAME of JESUS: Acts 19: 4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. 5 When they heard this, they were baptized...

The TORAH is what Jesus read from, when He read Isaiah, "that no prophet has honor within His own country.".. So, let's see what the Torah (which is what God Himself in the flesh used) says about "Elohim said, let us make man in our own image and in our likeness?" The Almighty said, “Let us...

Meaning of Elohim In Biblical Hebrew, Elohim is often referred to in the singular despite the -im ending. ... Exodus 3:4, "Elohim called unto him out of the midst of the bush ..."), it behaves like a singular noun in Hebrew grammar, and is then generally understood to denote the ((single God...

You have a wonderful day!! look up Matthew 28:19 changed to trinity on google: You will see where multiple Catholic institutions plus a former POPE admits how the Catholics changed it to the trinity in the 2nd century!! See you later!!

I gave you what Elohim means in Hebrew (Singular ONE GOD). So no, the Hebrew/Jews never believed God was 3 person throughout entire Old Testament and Jesus (I AM) creator of all was here from day 1 with Adam. Obviously, if the Hebrews know God is only ONE PERSON, why DON'T YOU? See ya later...

I have to go and work hahahaha I'll answer later. But I stand by what I state: the Bible is full of things that prove the Catholics changed scripture. No one has to believe it, but even they have admitted to some of the changes in their encyclopedia's!!

The prophet Isaiah lived in the eighth and early seventh centuries BC. He was from Jerusalem and began his ministry in 740 BC, the year of King Uzziah’s death. The golden age of Latin literature is a period consisting roughly of the time from 75 BC to AD 14, covering the end of the Roman...

LATIN was not used by ANYONE till almost 1,500 years after Isaiah died... So, if Latin was not even a language yet, HOW DID IT GET INTO ISAIAH which is of the OLD TESTAMENT?