Search results

Here's how I answer those three questions using only love. 1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes Here's how I answer those three questions using love based on God's objective moral standard. 1. No. 2. No. 3. No.

Sure, it is our helplessness to do doing evil that results in death, that is, to break the law of God/good and life.

I'm confused. How is this not a contradiction? So, because I see a contradiction, my view is wrong?? And yet you're quoting him where he did claim the definition of morality (the law) is the ministry of death. So, hence my question. But perhaps I must make it more explicit. Can you...

Shifting the burden of proof unto me. I will merely reply with, "I did."

How on earth would one conclude that after reading the infamous Exodus event?

I fail to see how this is an issue? I already said that I can understand how doing evil is to be accursed... I merely took issue with a statement you made. Okay, just using love, only love. Can you show me how it is evil for a man having sex with another man?

Interesting. Can you explain more to me how Jehovah made a mistake to which Jesus corrected Him?

Okay, but then Paul is contradicting the law of the prophets... Also, can you explain to me why you interpret Paul to mean that the definition of good and evil is sin and death? Also, if I write "Do not murder," on stone, why is that problematic? I think your interpretations are erroneous...

Quotation please.

Vain offerings :: "I can kill him, as long as I say sorry to Jesus."

That I can understand. If you do evil, you're accursed. It should be obvious. If you commit adultery, be prepared to lose your marriage. If you kill someone, be prepared for the consequences. And even if the curse doesn't hit you in this life, it won't go by Jehovah. But that wasn't the claim...

The person who says I am wrong but for two times did not say why and doesn't engage with me.

It doesn't matter, it was still their accusation. They accused Jesus of doing exactly what you claim He did. If they were lying, then your statement is false.

Okay, but then to use Paul's writings on why not to regard the law and the prophets is thus erroneous.

That's a false dichotomy, as the alternative is merely ignorance. And to have good written on the heart is to want to do good, not because you are obligated to.

Yeah, of course. I mean, what kind of father would not be irritated that his children are using his mercy to carry on doing evil? Surely you don't go, "Ah, it's okay for me to kill him, because I got Jesus?" That is exactly their mindset. Hence, vain offerings.

By making such a statement is really taking the side of the Jews who accused Jesus of exactly that, and would, at the same time, make Jesus evil for teaching others to be evil. Also, it is arguing that God doesn't exist, because if objective moral values and duties, as Moses claimed, does not...

To claim that knowledge of what is good and evil can make you perfect is nonsensical. One can fully know what he is doing is evil and still do it.

Again, this makes no sense to me. If my son stole something from me, is me telling him that it is evil to steal condemning him? No, it is so that he knows it is evil and next time do good instead. In other words, next time he will, instead of stealing, be holy and do that which is right...

Oh I agree that he does not. I am saying that the interpretations that causes Paul to contradict the Word of God are erroneous. For example, "Thus saith Jehovah... NO! Thus saith Paul."