Search results

I like how most questions on this forum aren't regarding dispensationalism, yet there's always a dispensationalist who's doctrine is questioned, because nothing they believe actually fits scripture. So they twist it to their own destruction.

This answer is getting annoying. Read the full verses. "For the Son of Man will come in His Father’s glory with His angels, and then He will repay each one according to what he has done. Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in...

"This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me."

“Why do you call Me good?” Jesus replied. “No one is good except God alone."

Your false doctrine is easily dismantled with a basic understanding of scripture. So you run off claiming "we believe different meanings of one verse". This is why you believe your false doctrine, you run off when the debate doesn't look in your favor.

You just completely missed the point that Paul never taught differently from Jesus. If you don't keep the law, you won't be saved. This is a clear confusion on your part which brings about your false doctrine. The law doesn't save, but if you don't keep the law, you won't be saved. By works...

I already explained what that verse meant and how Jesus taught the same, did you miss it? "Not being under the law doesn't mean we don't keep the law. The verse is teaching that the law doesn't save, grace does. Jesus taught to keep the law; He never taught the law saves. Jesus taught, "Truly...

Jesus says to judge righteously and so I am. Someone who is against the words of Jesus is against Him. Also hypocritical to say I judge, yet you judged me saying I'm close minded. Still waiting on what Paul taught that was different from Jesus. You demean people who don't believe in your false...

Yea, the same principle as when Jesus said, "if you don't believe me of earthly thing, how will you believe if I tell you of heavenly things". Asserting that Jesus was referring to some special message, which He would only reveal to one man later on, is a ridiculous idea. Especially when He...

I can see you're a cultist by nature in saying, "I can see you have a closed mind now...that is understandable why you would resist it". I can say the same to you, doesn't do any good to keep repeating it, as thought it's helping your false doctrine. Not being under the law doesn't mean we...

Seems you keep ignoring my obvious points that destroy your doctrine, and going-on about some irrelevant stitched-together ideas. So I'll ask, what did Paul teach that Jesus did not?

"Therefore go and make disciples of ALL NATIONS, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey EVERYTHING I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age." Jesus said that to His disciples.

Yea...the gospel that Jesus gave to Paul and His disciples. Both the same gospel. Both given by Jesus to teach to all people.

Yea definitely a great tactic by Jesus. Create 2 separate messages for 2 separate people, but have both messages taught to all nations. If your best argument is that Paul didn't go to Jerusalem, and having to stitch verses together, you should re-consider what you've been brainwashed into.

"Go preach everything I have commanded you, but stop preaching after I die and resurrect, because the message won't be necessary after that, I'll just tell Paul everything instead". Jesus spent His entire life teaching a message that would be done away with right after He dies. Yea, your logic...

Yea there were dietary, clothing laws, etc. That was the old covenant. Jesus came to teach the new covenant. "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood." (who is "you"? The Jews only?) But this topic was about salvation. You're claiming "follow Me and keep the...

In other words you're saying, you don't have to follow anything Jesus said. Only what Paul said. Or are you picking and choosing what Jesus said, when you feel it applies to you?

I think he means, we can't get saved by our works unless we have grace.

A lot of hyper-grace on this forum. Those claiming Paul had a separate message from Jesus are deluding themselves. If the preaching of Jesus was only for Jews, then you can tear those pages out, because they don't apply to you and this age. Jesus came for the Jews, but He accepted gentiles who...

Yes I understand that. But it's not answering the question. My OP wasn't about doing good deeds for salvation. It's why didn't Jesus in those interactions, mention baptism of the Spirit and water, and eating/drinking flesh/blood. Your first point explains half of the context of the verse...