Search results

Do you know any audio commentaries for the new testament that you would recommend? It's very hard to find one that doesn't support antinomianism.

Do you know any commentaries that don't pretend the law has been abolished? Preferably audio commentaries. Thanks.

God didn't write the Bible either, men did, but they were inspired by God.

Peter was given authority when he was given the keys and when Jesus made him the shepherd.

Influence is not the same thing as authority. A prime minister is usually more involved in politics than a monarch, but the monarch has higher authority (not saying Peter was a monarch, just making an example of authority vs influence). Paul rebuking Peter just shows that he wasn't infallible...

I don't see how that does anything to take away from Peter being the chief apostle. The x was for your completely uncalled-for comment about me worshipping Peter, which I've made clear that I don't.

Pharisees were apostates as well, but Jesus still told everyone to obey them in Mathew 23:3. You jumped to conclusions, and you failed to differentiate between physical and spiritual authority.

Are you saying the verse I quoted in John 20:23 says something else? Why haven't you clarified what it says? It sounds like you're just making poor excuses not to address it.

Unlike you I study the Bible. I don't call Pope God man on the throne or do anything that you claim. You are a liar, a gaslighter, and a hypocrite.

Not if they're actually lying or gaslighting. You should stop being a hypocrite.

I can say the same thing about you. You are the one among many who are deceived. I did check the Bible and gave you the verses, and you ignored them, while gaslighting me and calling me the gaslighter.

Another strawman from you. I never claimed Peter was sent to Gentiles, I said he was the chief apostle.

No, that's not gaslighting. Me refuting your false claims by providing bible verses is not gaslighting. You on the other hand keep ignoring the verses I post to make it sound like I'm wrong, that makes YOU the gaslighting hypocrite here, not me.

Now you're lying, you literally said worship, not focus. Another strawman from you, I never said Peter was the foundation, I said he was the chief apostle.

Moot point. Billions of Catholics are convinced that the holy spirit is guiding them toward the Catholic church.

I already gave you John 20:23 showing how Jesus gave the power to forgive sins to his disciples. Everything else in your argument is strawman, I never said Mary can forgive sins or that she was eternal virgin. I also made it clear that RCC authority is only physical, not spiritual.

I gave you actual verses, so it's not me disagreeing with scripture, it's you. AND you conveniently ignored how I already refuted your claim that no man can forgive sins by quoting John 20:23. It is you who is rebelling against the church that Jesus has founded.

I don't get how that's a valid comparison. We are talking about 2 apostles in the SAME covenant, preaching the same message. Jews have always been more important to God than Gentitles. They are called his children and the original olive tree/branches. I don't worship Peter, so that's a...

Peter wasn't mentioned in the Romans because he wasn't in Rome. That's true, but that doesn't disprove his authority over the other disciples, if anything that only proves my point. Jews are God's children and were always the main focus of God, that's why it was Peter who was assigned as chief...

There are no prophets in heaven, so Jesus was talking about John simply as a human being/soul. Jesus revealed the truth about spiritual kingdom as early as Mathew 13 in parable of the sower, parable of wheat and tares etc.