Search results

If you are osas, then study the other side of the debate. Osas is devised by man.

Apparently you are Replacement theology, because what you've just described yourself as believing is that the church has replaced Israel. Romans, chapters 9, 10, 11 Completely And absolutely refute that notion.

The delay is 2 fold. 1) He is delayed because that's where we're at. We know to meet him. We're told to watch for him. We wait as he is currently delayed. And the inference is he could come at any Moment We are currently in the delay time frame. 2) the other reason, or component of the parable...

Replacement theology believes all that. Non Replacement theology also believes every word of that.

All pretrib and premils believe all of that.

Israel becoming a nation is a huge problem for your doctrine. You quote church father's that saw Israel scattered. IOW, THEIR prism was clouded and you picked it up and pretend it is crystal clear.

Show us where the mark of the beast ever happened. The flying scorpions and hailstones of fire. Is satan bound? And stop calling us bible hounds evil. Saying we do not use a bible, and are tutored by "jesuits" is a lie. So stop your lies and open a bible

People who are "replacement" can not unpack romans 9,10,11. What can they possibly do with it?

From what I have seen most amils are replacement theology. The new replacement breed of warriors denies The term "replacement". They don't like it. But it perfectly defines them. Amil is an animal all it's own, and robs them in other areas of God's word. Amil is confusion.

I must have zigged when I shulda zagged My bad.

In Rev 5 the Son takes the scroll out of the hand of the Father. That alone destroys "oneness doctrine " deciseively.

Lol I have no idea of mormans teaching. What you are doing is called guilt by association. If mormans say "God is in heaven" Is God bad and not in heaven? Satanists use the Holy Bible. Is the bible bad? Anyone can ascribe error wildly. This thread proves it.

No gifts are revoked. The bible never teaches that. Same God that the early church had. Same mission. Same miracles.

If they are posting or debating "concept vs concept", it will usually invoke lively debate. If it deteriorates into personal attacks, or out and out blatant heresy, mods can step in and scold them, or lock the thread, or ban somebody. It's different if they are seeking answers or guidance, vs...

I didn't read the whole thread. But I read most of it. And I don't think 1 person responded to that verse. Mat 24 38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until...

Thread tuned into a trinity debate.

Totally false.

Oneness pentecostal? Jesus is the Father?

Amen It is the same Jesus and Holy Spirit that was empowering the church 2k yrs ago. Hard to believe there are those hoping to have less power , intimacy and anointing. SMH Flat out bizarre.

Not in the bible You 100% made it up, or you have been decieved by wrong teachers.