Are messianic Jews turning their back on grace?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Miah45

Guest
#21
Thank you!



My perception is no, but I could be wrong. It seems like in Isreal related conflicts, Isreal is so often blamed for being the agressor. I mean, that crisis that they had a couple of months ago. One of the major humanitarian orgainzations (I think it was the Red Cross) who's never supposed to point a finger was pointing a finger at Isreal. HOWEVER, if the Palistinians have taken a more passive resistance approach from the start, they'd be a lot further. This is why the Bible tells us not to repay evil with evil but to overcome evil with good.



Sounds complicated.
As someone who's been around for a war or two... (I freelanced for American News companies during the Lebanon war) let me tell you it is COMPLICATED!! LOL :)

I raise the media thing purely because non-biased media has been such an issue, just like Ambulances has been for Israeli security (Hamas have repeatedly used them to smuggle weapons and terrorists in and out with the wounded) This has put Israel in a hugely difficult situation especially with the Red Cross etc... Imagine US troops corner Bin Laden and the Red Cross jumps in to treat his grazed knee.. :)

Obviously I'm being slightly humorous but the issues get pretty deep.

this website has put out some great posts that comes from a professional standards angel more than a political one

This story for example got hardly any of the attention it deserves.
http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/reports/The_Photo_that_Started_it_All.asp
 
M

Miah45

Guest
#22
Tony Campolo's podcasts are pretty good too. I recommend that everyone check them out.
Yeah.. I like that he gets into issues that aren't necessarily on a christians radar.. he is a little funny though with his pro-Clinton angle.. ALTHOUGH I LOVE the fact that we're hearing a christian not pull down the nations leaders but celebrate what they did right!. I wouldn't hold poverty on a par with abortion though (even though its easy to politicize the pro-life issues) at least that's the way it comes across.. I get that he wants to put poverty issues on our radar like Bono does.

I guess that carries over with his stance on Israel... what's good is that he tries to get us consider the other side. Sure he's certainly willing to air Israel's dirty laundry in public (Yes that's right all is not holy in the holy land) and I can't stand the idea of those professing to love Israel neglecting the promise to Ishmael.
It is however really hard to get over the feeling that he's spinning you the party line.... it's great that he wants us to think outside the box. I'm not sure however he hasn't bought the party line about 'Palestinians'
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#23
I wouldn't hold poverty on a par with abortion though (even though its easy to politicize the pro-life issues) at least that's the way it comes across.. I get that he wants to put poverty issues on our radar like Bono does.
Exactly!!! We need to focus on what Jesus said. I mean obviously we assume that Jesus opposes abortion, but the truth of the matter is that when we stand before Jesus and he says "I was hungry, did you feed me?" I don't want to be one who said "Well, there were a lot of people in my country who got layed off and then had trouble affording both food and health care for their children, BUT I voted for someone who supported passing legislation against late term abortions (and he lowered my taxes to boot!) so doesn't that just make up for everything?"

I mean, I'm not saying that abortion is not an important side issue, but when we look at the words of Jesus we can't pretend that it's on par with poverty. It's like, if my neighbour gets an abortion, that's her sin, and the doctor's sin, and the sin of anyone who's supporting her in that choice. Is that bad? Yes. Would we outlaw it if we think that would help? Maybe... That's kind of tricky... However, if I'm tolerating poverty, that's my sin. When we stand before God, we have to be accountable with what we've read in the Bible. I mean, if we in fact have a Bible where Jesus says "Just oppose abortion and gay rights and you'll be fine" then maybe God will take that into account, but my Bible has a Matthew 25:45 in it, and I will be judged accordingly.

I guess that carries over with his stance on Israel... what's good is that he tries to get us consider the other side. Sure he's certainly willing to air Israel's dirty laundry in public (Yes that's right all is not holy in the holy land)
As a Biblical scholar, he believes that most of the prophesies in the Bible came to pass in the first or second century. Don't ask me for details, thought, becasue I don't know them off hand. Like I said, it's all in his book 20 Hot Potatoes. But I wouldn't say that his Isreal position is based solely on Matthew 25. It's more complicated than that. Although I wouldn't say that he's ok with how the Palistinians have been treated.

ALTHOUGH I LOVE the fact that we're hearing a christian not pull down the nations leaders but celebrate what they did right!.
Yeah, well, the important thing to remember about Campolo is that even though he's a card carrying member of Democrat Party, he doesn't support everything that Democrats do. I mean the USA is made up of 300 million people, and there are only two major parties. Those two parties don't perfectly represent the views of every last individual. It just drives me nuts that they were critical of Campolo when he counciled Clinton during you know what. I mean take King David for example, when he realized he sin, if he had sought advice from a wise Rabbi, do you think the other Rabbis would have desoned the one he talked to? No. I guess it's just human nature to revel in the mistakes our enemies.

I get that he wants to put poverty issues on our radar like Bono does.
What I don't get is that this isn't on the forefront of every Christians minds. I mean, I don't expect that everyone take a Bono-like approach to it. And by that I mean that Bono likes to work on the marco level in areas like debt reduction. Because really, the amount of money that developing countries are spending on interest never mind the principal, is just rediculous. And why are so many Christians ok with that? Well, lots of Christians sponsor children in the devleoping world, and really don't want anyone to underestimate the importance of development NGOs. My brother-in-law did his thesis on that. He even has classmates that now work at the Canadian head office of World Vision!

But the developing world aside. There's so much poverty in our own countries. My church likes to work on both the micro and the macro level. So, we collect for the food bank and for our Lenten project we've been collecting craft supplies for a summer camp for inner-city kids. AND we also are given web addresses of how we can write to our politicians to urge them to support anti-poverty initiatives. This to us is all just a normal part of being a Christian.

I can't stand the idea of those professing to love Israel neglecting the promise to Ishmael.'
Interesting... what's the promise to Ishmael? Well, I mean, I've read the Bible I know what God said about Ishmael, but how does the promise to Ishmael work into loving Isreal. Or rather, tell me about what you know about those who profess to love Isreal neglect that promise to Ishmael, as you say???

It is however really hard to get over the feeling that he's spinning you the party line.... I'm not sure however he hasn't bought the party line about 'Palestinians'
I'm not sure what you mean, you'll have to explain.
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#24
As someone who's been around for a war or two... (I freelanced for American News companies during the Lebanon war) let me tell you it is COMPLICATED!! LOL :)

I raise the media thing purely because non-biased media has been such an issue, just like Ambulances has been for Israeli security (Hamas have repeatedly used them to smuggle weapons and terrorists in and out with the wounded) This has put Israel in a hugely difficult situation especially with the Red Cross etc... Imagine US troops corner Bin Laden and the Red Cross jumps in to treat his grazed knee.. :)

Obviously I'm being slightly humorous but the issues get pretty deep.

this website has put out some great posts that comes from a professional standards angel more than a political one

This story for example got hardly any of the attention it deserves.
http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/reports/The_Photo_that_Started_it_All.asp
Yeah, it is complicated and difficult. That's totally inarguable. This is what makes me wonder if it was done completely God's way. I can't imagine the Red Cross letting Hamas put terrorits in their ambulances, though. Their nutrality and their protection of civilians is pretty important to them. They won't help one side by transporting terrorists. BUT, Hamas like to use civilians, right? Well, when you're a stateless people and a paramilitary organization is all you have because you can't really have a real military because that would require a state, then the line between military and civilian gets blurred.

Like I said, if they hadn't taken the terrorist approach, they'd be a lot better off now. If they never used women and children, Isreal wouldn't feel justified in bombing women and children. I guess the Palestinians thought that if they engaged in enough terroirism than the Jews would get tired and leave. Well, I guess they underestimated the support of the USA, because I have co-workers who have family in Isreal and they love it there, and probably wouldn't leave for anything.
 
M

Miah45

Guest
#25
LOL... I think you misunderstood me!

I'm saying that POVERTY is NOT in anywhere near the same league as abortion! (i.e Abortion is more important)

What I am agreeing with is that poverty shouldn't be off our radars, and there is so much for us yet to do in dealing with this.

I am really confused about what you feel we are socially responsible for and how you got there ?? :)

but when we look at the words of Jesus we can't pretend that it's on par with poverty. It's like, if my neighbour gets an abortion, that's her sin, and the doctor's sin, and the sin of anyone who's supporting her in that choice. Is that bad? Yes. Would we outlaw it if we think that would help? Maybe... That's kind of tricky... However, if I'm tolerating poverty, that's my sin.

(Is there really a whole generation of believers that won't move on an issue or see how important something is to God's heart if Jesus didn't say it verbatim or word for word??)

(I'm thinking right now I really must be misunderstanding you!! :)

I am SO against poverty and social justice... and Jesus words are obviously so hard hitting...
but as a Jew not making a stand against abortion is just like living in the ghetto and presenting babies at the front door for the Nazi's to take off to the pyres.

I wonder how Matthew 25 would have read with that in mind...(and let's not forget Matthew 18 or how Heaven responded to the child sacrifice in the OT)

Finally... I'm not sure we're ALL not doing anything?... remember the jubilee project??
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#26
LOL... I think you misunderstood me!

I'm saying that POVERTY is NOT in anywhere near the same league as abortion! (i.e Abortion is more important)
I don't know how you can justify that Biblically. Like I said, I don't think abortion is right by any means, but poverty claims more lives of children than aboriton. I mean, you may be thinking of abortion like being murder in the first and poverty like murder in second. But I don't see it that way. I see poverty as something we are called to directly be Jesus to act on. Like, if Jesus said regecting the poor is just as bad as regecting him...

Ok, regecting the poor would be worse than me myself actually having an abortion. That would be very, very wrong. When I'm talking about the "abortion issue" and the "gay rights issue" I'm really talking about the sins of others. And I think (oh I have a feeling you're not going to like this) it's human nature to want to focus on the sins of others and not on the sins of ourselves. I fear that's what non-Christians see when they look at us. I mean, that which I can do to stop homosexuals from engaging in such activity and what we can do to stop abortions is very limited.

Like, ok, yes, I know, you're going tell me that we could, in theory, make abortion illegal and then all abortions would stop, right? Well, I'm thinking they'd continue. Because if the doctor doing it was arrested and stood trial, all that would be needed was one jury member who stubbornly maintained that abortion wasn't murder and therefore refused to vote guilty and you have hung jury and therefore no conviction. This is, if I remember correctly, how abortion became legal in Canada. This may be why when I looked into abortion laws around the world I was surprised how many countries were listed as "illegal but not enforced."

So, Campolo wants to take a different approach. He read the stat (I've seen the same study) that 73% of women getting an abortion cite not being able to afford a baby as one of the reasons for having an abortion. And, in univeristy when we looked at public benefits for familes by country, and it does make (no offence) the USA the last place in the industrialized world that I'd want to face an unplanned pregancy. I mean here, at least you don't have to worry about the cost of pre-natal care and hospital bills. I heard that all that in the USA the medical expenses associated with having a baby can be like $5000 (you'll have to correct me if that's not true, since I can't remember where I read it). If I was facing an unplanned pregnancy, I don't know where I'd find that kind of money to bring the baby to term. So in short, Campolo wants to tackle those issues.

Which brings me to another point. I had a non-Christian classmate in my American Government class in university who looked at the USA's high infant mortality rates and asked me why Christians who are in the USA care more about the fetus than about the baby.

So what I'm saying is that I think God wants us to protect that sanctity of life from conception to natural death and not just from conception to birth.
 
M

Miah45

Guest
#27
ha yeah still misunderstanding me.. :)

anyway, this is a different thread altogether. sorry!
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#28
I am really confused about what you feel we are socially responsible for and how you got there ?? :)
From the Bible of course! But, did you watch those Youtube videos I posted? I didn't think so. Ok then, check out this book
http://www.christianbook.com/Christian/Books/product?item_no=558288&event=CF

But the truth of that matter is that Matthew 25 is not the only passage of scripture about caring for the poor, it's just the only one I've brought up (but you of course know that because you've read the Bible)
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#29
Stand corrected, you did so watch those vidoes. Then where's the confusion???
 
M

Miah45

Guest
#30
yeah I watched the clips.. and I think you're missing where I agree with you and not getting my questions

but..seriously bro... wrong thread :)
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#31
It is however really hard to get over the feeling that he's spinning you the party line.... it's great that he wants us to think outside the box. I'm not sure however he hasn't bought the party line about 'Palestinians'
What does "spinning you the party line" mean? Is that some kind of idiom I've never heard of? And what's the party line about "Palestinians"? And he hasn't "bought" anything. He has a doctrate and he's great at testing claims and thinking for himself.

My point is this (although it's terribly off topic) from what I see of American politics (and yes, I do get Fox News up here) the Republicans would rather have a high infant mortality rate, than use public funds to insure that every pregnant woman and child in America has all the health care they need, because that would be "socialist" which they believe is the root of all evil. I'm sorry, is that in the Bible?

The guy who gave us Canadians socialized medicine was a Baptist preacher name Tommy Douglas. He was also voted Greatest Canadian in 2004. His advocat (also the guy who interviewed Campolo in that video) stood on the border with the US and said that every 30 seconds someone there declares bankrupcy because they can't pay their medical bills. Four more years of Bush later... no I won't get into that.

Anyway, the bottom line is this: obviously I think abortion is wrong. But what I don't get (and maybe never will) is why if the Republicans fancy themselves the God party, why do they dig in their heels when their opponents try to fight poverty?
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#32
yeah I watched the clips.. and I think you're missing where I agree with you and not getting my questions

but..seriously bro... wrong thread :)
No, I get where you agree with me, but if I only focus on where you agree with me, I don't learn anything.

And like I said... Well, I didn't know much about the Christian's involvement with the Jubilee Porject. I mean, my church, but I guess the political affiliation of other Christians still confuses me. And furthermore, I do know that a lot of Christians in the USA support NGOs such as World Vision, Samaritians Purse ect. and that's really important. And non-Christians who are critical of Christian's treatment of the poor need to not underestimate that.

And although I would like you to answer my questions, you're right, this is WAY off topic.
 
T

tonga

Guest
#33
I haven't set up a profile yet, so let me introduce myself so it does
not appear I am trying to mislead anyone.

I am a non-Messianic Orthodox Jew. I have become interested in
the Messianic movement-but let me be clear I have no interest
in joining it-as a phenomena amongst gentiles. It has failed
overall to attract Jews, but it seems to be a growing faith
amongst gentiles.

I was googling for information about this movement and ended up here.

What do you think about Christians who take on Jewish practices?
Do you think they too "turn their backs on grace" by following
Torah, and practices outside of Torah (ie Jewish traditions and
rulings set the rabbinical and Talmudic law)?
 
M

Miah45

Guest
#34
ברך הבא

yeah whilst the messianic movement outside of Israel may attract many gentiles.. it's growing fast in Israel!!!

The question you ask is a long and complicated one.. (what's not in Judaism right!??:)

we have a paradox .. In many ways Torah is the beginning of our relationship with God and as believers who follow the Brit Hadasha we launch out into the deep of the Tanakh as you can imagine if you also believed Moshiakh had come.. we certainly see it (Torah) in a new light.. and yet in following Yeshua Torah is there with us as the Law become flesh...we keep all Torah simply by following him and obeying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.