In Solomon's day, Philistines would have been geographical Israelis just as Judeans would have been geographical Israelis. But then there's also the question of whether being Jewish is about heritage, ancestry, geographical origin or belief, or all four.
It gets fairly complex because rabbis have varying opinions, but suffice to say that the words 'no Jew or gentile, no slave nor free' should be adequate to portray that each person should be viewed equally as human beings, Palestinian or Israeli, Arab or Hebrew, Muslim or Jew. And since Genesis tells us the Philistines were Casluchim descendants, non-Semitic, therefore 'Gentiles', most likely of Greek origin, they should be considered no less than a Christian would consider a Jew, for both are quoted by Jesus, 'neither Jew nor Gentile'.
In otherwords, favouritism for Jews killing Gentiles is really not warranted and anyone who thinks otherwise is in for awakening.
It gets fairly complex because rabbis have varying opinions, but suffice to say that the words 'no Jew or gentile, no slave nor free' should be adequate to portray that each person should be viewed equally as human beings, Palestinian or Israeli, Arab or Hebrew, Muslim or Jew. And since Genesis tells us the Philistines were Casluchim descendants, non-Semitic, therefore 'Gentiles', most likely of Greek origin, they should be considered no less than a Christian would consider a Jew, for both are quoted by Jesus, 'neither Jew nor Gentile'.
In otherwords, favouritism for Jews killing Gentiles is really not warranted and anyone who thinks otherwise is in for awakening.