Chemotherapy?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#41
Chemical attack was rebel provocation, former captives say — RT News

Published time: September 10, 2013 03:24


AFP Photo / Louai Abo Al-Jo

Belgian teacher Pierre Piccinin and Italian journalist Domenico Quiric, both of whom were abducted and held hostage for several months in Syria, said they overheard in an exchange between their captors that rebels were behind the recent chemical attack.

In a number of interviews to European news outlets, the former hostages said they overheard an English-language Skype conversation between their captors and other men which suggested it was rebel forces – not the government - that used chemical weapons on Syria’s civilian population in an August 21 attack near Damascus.

“It is a moral duty to say this. The government of Bashar al-Assad did not use sarin gas or other types of gas in the outskirts of Damascus,”
Piccinin said during an interview with Belgium's RTL radio station.

Piccinin stressed that while being held captive, he and fellow prisoner Quirico were secluded from the outside world and had no idea that chemical weapons were deployed. But the conversation which both men overheard suggested that the use of the weapons was a strategic move by the opposition, aimed at getting the West to intervene.

"In this conversation, they said that the gas attack on two neighborhoods of Damascus was launched by the rebels as a provocation to lead the West to intervene militarily,”
Quirico told Italy’s La Stampa. "We were unaware of everything that was going on during our detention in Syria, and therefore also with the gas attack in Damascus."

While stating that the rebels most likely exaggerated the accident’s death toll, the Italian journalist stressed that he could not vouch whether “the conversation was based on real facts." However, he said that one of the three people in the alleged conversation identified himself as a Free Syrian Army general, La Stampa reported.

Based on what both men have learned, Peccinin told RTL that it would be “insane and suicidal for the West to support these people.”

“It pains me to say it because I've been a fierce supporter of the Free Syrian Army in its rightful fight for democracy since 2012,"
Piccinin added.


Belgian national Pierre Piccinin (L) disembark from the airplane on September 9, 2013 at Ciampino military airport in Rome (AFP Photo)

Quirico seems to agree with Peccini’s assessment.

“I am extremely surprised that the United States could think about intervening, knowing very well how the Syrian revolution has become international jihadism – in other words Al-Qaeda," Quirico said, as quoted by Italy’s Quotidiano Nazionale.

The 62-year-old La Stampa journalist believes that radical Islamic groups operating in Syria to topple Assad “want to create a caliphate and extend it to the entire Middle East and North Africa.”
In a number of news appearances, both Quirico and Piccinin shared stories of how they were subjected to two mock executions, beaten, and starved during their five-month captivity.

"These have been very tough months. We were beaten on a daily basis, we suffered two mock executions,"
Quirico told reporters upon his arrival in Rome, AFP reported.


Italian journalist Domenico Quirico disembark from the airplane on September 9, 2013 at Ciampino military airport in Rome (AFP Photo)

"There was sometimes real violence...humiliation, bullying, mock executions...Domenico faced two mock executions, with a revolver," Piccinin told RTL.

Both men were kidnapped in Syria last April by a group of armed men in pickup trucks who were believed to be from Free Syrian Army.

According to Piccinin, the captors soon transferred them over to the Abu Ammar brigade, a rebel group "more bandit than Islamist."

"We were moved around a lot...it was not always the same group that held us, there were very violent groups, very anti-West and some anti-Christian,"
Piccinin said.

Both men tried to escape twice but their attempts were unsuccessful, prompting the rebel group to punish them for their actions.

The Italian government announced on Sunday that both men had been freed after Rome intensified negotiations with the rebels for the release of the prisoners ahead of an anticipated US strike on Syria.

Another 13 journalists are still believed to be missing in Syria, according to Reporters Without Borders.
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#42
Act Now! - Tell Congress: Vote NO on Bombing Syria

Act Now! - Tell Congress: Vote NO on Bombing Syria - Intifada Palestine�|�Intifada Palestine

Here’s the Best Way to Tell Senate Your Opinion on Syria - Click Here to find Your Senator and call your member of the Senate or E-Mail them.

Here’s the Best Way to Tell Congress Your Opinion on Syria - Click Here To Find Your Representative and call your member of Congress or E-Mail them.


by Elias Harb

There will be a crucial vote this week by the Senate and U.S. Congress on a resolution for authorization for the use of military force against Syria. I urge all to phone or E-Mail your member of Congress and Senator and tell them NO to U.S. military intervention against Syria. If the U.S. attacks Syria, it will be aiding extremists groups, who are linked to Al-Qaeda. What happened to the war against terror? Why is the Obama administration going to bed with Al-Qaeda?

The alleged charge by the Obama administration that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against its citizens is without a shred of evidence. The CIA fabricated evidence along with and Israel Intelligence to lure US into war with Syria” The intelligence gathered against Syria’s Assad was manufactured by elements within the spy community in order to mislead the US President to take punitive action, Ray McGovern, a veteran CIA analyst, told RT. Why would the Syrian Government use Chemical weapons when they are winning the war against the Syrian opposition who are backed by the Zionist, Saudi, Qatar, NATO and U.S. alliance. The attack also comes just days after UN weapons inspectors landed in Damascus to begin a probe into the alleged use of chemical weapons. In June 6, Syrian rebel were seized on the Turkish-Syrian border with a 2kg cylinder full of nerve gas Sarin.

The chemical attack on August 21 was launched by Syrian rebels to provoke a U.S. military intervention on their behalf. The chemical weapons were supplied to the Rebels by Saudi Arabia, which is a sponsor of terrorism in the Middle East.

Continued...
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#45
[video=youtube;bsyQ442Xvnw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsyQ442Xvnw[/video]
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#46
[video=youtube;pInIvC7NZ_A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pInIvC7NZ_A[/video]
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#47
[video=youtube;WbIrm42zYTU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbIrm42zYTU[/video]
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#48
ON-GOING PROGRAM TO DESTABILIZE MIDDLE EAST | ACM OUTPOST

Posted on September 2, 2013 by Ben

NOTE: Some people wonder why the Middle East is always in turmoil, and why those countries can never seem to get their act together. Most Americans seem to have attributed a racial/religious stigma to those countries, as if the people there are mentally deficient to manage themselves sensibly. Of course, most Americans know little or nothing of history. If they did know something of history they’d realize that in the sciences and industry the “Orientals” were advanced far beyond Europe and Britain as recently as the 1700′s.

Then something changed.

What changed is that Britain developed into an international military machine that began to dominate and colonize those nations. Those nations were brought into subjugation through military conquest … resulting in destruction of their infrastructure, their schools, and their long-practiced way of life.

Then the US took up where Britain left off … bombing, terrorizing, tearing down and rebuilding according to western governments’ dictates. In essence, the West has been warring against and ruining the structure and society of those people and nations for a long time now. In light of this fact, it is no wonder that the Middle East has had trouble keeping up. No nation under constant attack by bombs, internal undermining by America’s CIA, Britain’s MI6 and Israrel’s MOSSAD could do better.

The west’s war against the Middle East began as far back as the time of Crusades of the 11th century. But with the advances in western tools of warfare, the ravaging of the Middle East has become even more brutal and pervasive. Since 1948 the West even employed the Zionist state of Israel as its agent of destruction to undermine the Middle East from within. And the ongoing plan has been to push those nations back to the stone age and keep them there.

In spite of it all, Iran managed to pull itself up by the bootstraps. Iran has progressed and advanced in spite of the West’s prejudice against it, and in spite of the US and Britain doing all kinds of evil things to keep it from prospering and surviving.

Other nations in the area have not been so fortunate. Most of them have been suffering quietly under the heavy hand of terrorism and military aggression from France, Britain and the US. And today the ignorant masses of the West (especially Americans) continue to ask, “Why do they hate us?” Wicked western politicians and preachers tell their gullible and childish masses that they hate us because of our freedom. Of course that’s a laugh. Anyone with the slightest capacity for thinking knows that is not the reason for the bad blood between the West and the Middle East. The West deserves to be hated by middle easterners for what the West has been doing to them for centuries.

The following recent article from NPR reveals publicly what many of us have known for a long time. In 1953 the US and Britain, in behalf of the western-owned oil companies, against the wishes of Iranians, overthrew Iran’s legitimate elected leader, Mohammed Mossadeck, and replaced him with The Shah who reigned as a king and facilitated western oil companies that took over the oil industry of Iran.

Iranians despised this overthrow of their government and eventually raised the outrage to the point of a general rebellion that threw out the Shah in 1979 and instead recognized the supreme religious leader, Ayatollah Khomeini who called America “The Great Satan.” Since that rejection of western dominance, Iran has done exceedingly well, much to the chagrin of the western powers and the major oil companies. As a result of Iran’s leadership and success, it is currently the focus of western and Israeli hatred and propaganda, and is in constant threat of assault of all kinds from western powers. — (ed)

Declassified Documents Reveal CIA Role In 1953 Iranian Coup

NPR

September 01, 2013 6:18 PM



Former Iranian Premier Mohammed Mossadegh appears in October 1951. The CIA’s overthrow of Mossadegh was a template for the agency’s covert operations going forward.

The Central Intelligence Agency was behind the overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953. It’s been an open secret for decades, but last week, The George Washington University’s National Security Archive released newly declassified proving it.

Orchestrating the Iranian coup d’état was a first for the CIA and would serve as the template for future Cold War covert operations worldwide.

Mossadegh “believed that Iran’s main problem at that time was that it was a country basically ruled by foreign empires,” tells Weekends on All Things Considered host Jacki Lyden. So, after less than a week in office, on May 1, 1951, Mossadegh decided to nationalize the British-run Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.

“To the British, because they discovered the oil and created the Iranian oil industry from scratch, it was a fair deal that they shared the oil revenue with the Iranian government,” says Bahari. “But, to many Iranians, especially those who did not remember that there was no oil in Iran before the British came, it was just unfair for a British company to have a monopoly over Iranian oil.”

However, the British would not leave quietly. According to Bahari, “Mossadegh had to go in order for the British to keep their monopoly,” and they began pursuing measures to topple the Iranian prime minister. Their plan succeeded, but only after two long years of spy craft, subversion and the eventual help of the CIA.

“I think a lesser man would fall within a week. Mossadegh was a very strong politician and a very strong man,” Bahari said.

Young CIA agents used suitcases full of cash to destabilize the regime. “They managed to buy newspaper editors, to buy hoodlums, they organized rallies in different cities, they created a fake communist party in order to create trouble,” Bahari said. Still, they almost failed.

According to Bahari, after Mossadegh and his allies thwarted the first coup attempt Aug. 15, 1953, officials in Washington wanted to pull the plug on the spy operation. They sent a telegram to Kermit Roosevelt Junior, the CIA officer leading the overthrow and grandson of Theodore Roosevelt, ordering him to cease and desist. “But Kermit Roosevelt just says ‘I never heard that’ and he carries on the operation and he succeeds,” Bahari said.

Four days later, a second coup attempt was successful.

“It’s kind of left a bitter taste in Iranians’ mouths,” says Bahari. “It’s created a very good excuse for the Iranian government to exploit the genuine grievances of the Iranian people.”
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#49
[video=youtube;SyQIv5wyYGE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyQIv5wyYGE[/video]
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
10
0
#50
PressTV - US’s evidence on Syria, fabricated: Retired CIA analyst

Elements within the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have fabricated intelligence to implicate the Syrian government in the recent chemical attack in Syria and cater for Washington’s case for launching strikes on the Middle Eastern country, says a retired CIA analyst.

Ray McGovern made the remark in an interview with Russia Today (RT) channel on Monday amid the US rhetoric of war against Syria.

The US has been intensively campaigning for strikes on Syria since August 21, when the militants operating inside the Arab country and its foreign-backed opposition claimed that over a thousand people had been killed in a government chemical attack on suburban Damascus.

The Syrian government categorically rejected the accusation.

The US has all along the way been insisting that it has strong “evidence” against the Syrian government while refusing repeated calls to release it publicly.

“The media is drumbeating for the war (on Syria) just as before Iraq,” McGovern said. “And they don’t want to hear that the evidence is very very flimsy. They don’t want to hear that people within the CIA - senior people, with great access to this information - assure us, the veterans, that there’s no conclusive evidence that Assad ordered those chemical incidents on August 21.”

McGovern was among the veteran intelligence professionals who recently signed a letter to US President Barack Obama, warning that Damascus was not behind the August 21 chemical attack in the Arab country and that CIA Director John Brennan “is perpetrating a pre-Iraq-War-type fraud on members of Congress, the media, [and] the public.”

The former CIA analyst stressed that only the Israeli regime would benefit from the crisis in Syria, as the unrest would make the Tel Aviv regime feel that “the Sunni and the Shia aren’t going to be turning their swords and their guns on Israel. It’s that simple.”

“So, what we have here is a situation where Israel and the tough guys - and tough gals now - in the White House, advising Obama, say, ‘you’ve got to do something’,” he added, in an apparent reference to US National Security Advisor Susan Rice and US envoy to the UN Samantha Power, who have been heavily involved in the US campaign for strikes on Syria.

Obama “is being given cooked-up intelligence because John Brennan, the head of the CIA, and James Clapper, the confessed perjurer, have thought it in their best interests to cater to the wishes of the White House, which have been very clear: ‘this time, we want to strike Syria,’” McGovern concluded.

The US president, who has faced very weak support for his war plans, said on August 31 that his administration would first seek authorization from an already skeptical Congress.

Reports indicate a majority of Congress members are either against the planned strikes on Syria or are yet undecided. The mood in the Congress seems to mirror that of the general American public, which, polls show, is largely opposed to any US strikes on Syria.

Meanwhile, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Al-Muallem said on Monday, September 9, that his country “welcomes” a Russian proposal to put its chemical weapons under international control. The Russian proposal was prompted by an apparently off-the-cuff comment by US Secretary of State John Kerry.

Following the new twist in the events, Obama suggested that the planned US strikes on Syria could be averted if the Syrian “gesture” is “real.” In televised comments, parts of a round of TV interviews meant to garner support for his war plans, Obama said it takes time “to tell whether this offer will succeed.” The US president has, therefore, asked the Congress to postpone a vote on his administration’s plan for strikes on Syria.

Obama, however, has said that the threat of American force would remain.

The UN, Iran, Russia, and China have been voicing strong opposition to the US plan for war.