That's all? I got the feeling there was an underlying point of misogyny. 'Female equality is to blame for the gap in rich and poor becoming broader, we should go back to sexual inequality'. That's what the article said to me.
What the thread said to me was that educated, stable men like to get drunk, leave their families and philander. On the other side of the coin, those poor, ignorant women are stuck with the duty of becoming champions of the household and defending the lives of their children while being sexually harassed.
IN “MAD MEN”, a series about the advertising industry in the 1960s, women are underpaid, sexually harassed and left with the kids while their husbands drunkenly philander.
If this tendency is true at least men now will only sexually harass successful, educated women, thus sparing the proletarian class of women.
I know that's my plan: stay away from ignorant women. Only sexually harass the educated. Check.