New book offered at Chick Publications

[ChosenbyHim]

By Chick Publications
​

Which Bible Would Jesus Use? is a new, entertaining and easy-to-read volume that delivers convincing answers to the most difficult objections posed by King James Bible critics.

Once you know for sure which Bible the Lord has already chosen and why, you'll never again have any doubts about "which Bible" is God's Bible.


5 reasons why you'll benefit from reading this book

First - You'll learn how to convince the critics that the Lord Jesus Christ would unequivocally choose a King James Bible if he came to their church.

Second - You'll learn how to prove that the elite textual critics who assembled the underlying Greek text of almost all modern versions actually believe that the Lord made errors when he inspired the Bible in the first place.

Third - You'll learn how to present a new and unanswerable argument as to why the Lord wouldn't use the New King James Version because he'd end up competing with himself.

Fourth - You'll learn how to quickly and easily answer the constant and mostly insincere question of "Which edition of the King James Bible is the word of God?"

Finally - You'll learn how to "turn the tables" and put the critics on the defensive by asking the simple question "If the Lord Jesus came to your church, which Bible would He use?" It's a question the critics won't have an answer for because they don't have a Bible that they believe is inspired and inerrant. There are no NIV Onlyists, ESV Onlyists or NASB Onlyists out there. They don't have a Bible-You do.

 

[Bushido8000]

1. Jesus wouldn't have to use a Bible.

2. He would most likely use the ASV as it is the most accurate English translation of the Bible and golden standard for most seminary schools.

3. Chick publications is gross and is one of the reasons why Christianity is the way that it is today.

 

[skipp]

Jesus spoke in Elizabethan English so of course He would only use the KJV.

 

[Nautilus]

does anyone other than kjv cultists even respect chick at this point?

 

[blue_ladybug]

1. Jesus wouldn't have to use a Bible.

2. He would most likely use the ASV as it is the most accurate English translation of the Bible and golden standard for most seminary schools.

3. Chick publications is gross and is one of the reasons why Christianity is the way that it is today.

​Just the name alone sounds lewd and gross..lol..

 

[David_1]

As much as I loathe Chick's madness and corruption of the message, I just love those wacky comics from an artistic standpoint.

Dark Dungeons was recently made into a movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qc9JiIiOSQ

 

[Agricola]

If Jesus has an original copy of the King James, does that mean he would also read from the Apocrypha as well?

 

[crossnote]

Jesus spoke the language of the people He was with. If your church congregants language is 17th century English then a KJV would most likely be His choice.

 

[ServantStrike]

Jesus spoke the language of the people He was with. If your church congregants language is 17th century English then a KJV would most likely be His choice.

To be fair, the KJV that they are discussing is not in 17th century English - it's late 18th century English. The authorized version is considerably more reader friendly than the 1611, and it's beauty lies in it's protestant origins, it's public domain nature, and it's consistency with older sermons and study materials. Personally I prefer the source text better too (if only the NKJV had panned out that way), but I know I'm in the minority on that one.

does anyone other than kjv cultists even respect chick at this point?

Not really, no.

I lean heavily towards the KJV (but not so heavily as some around here who make wild claims). Chick makes those of who prefer the translation look foolish. Some of the KJV only proponents already do a pretty good job of that, no need to make it worse...

 

[ChosenbyHim]

1. Jesus wouldn't have to use a Bible.

2. He would most likely use the ASV as it is the most accurate English translation of the Bible and golden standard for most seminary schools.

The ASV is not the 'most accurate' English translation of the Bible. The ASV is based on the most corrupt manuscripts out there (Siniaticus and Vaticanus). It is essentially a Roman Catholic bible.

Therefore, the Lord Jesus would certainly not use the ASV.

As a matter of fact, the ASV attacks the person and deity of Jesus Christ.

Here is the proof:

One Book Stands Alone - Chapter 2

3. Chick publications is gross and is one of the reasons why Christianity is the way that it is today.

No, the reason why so called Christianity is so apostate and lukewarm today is because of the ROTTEN apostate seminaries where the wicked apostates in those seminaries have destroyed the faith of many students who attended their schools.

Chick Publications is a sound, Bible believing ministry which exposes heresy, the wicked new versions, cults, and that defends the true word of God.