Schools 'should teach how to view porn', sex forum says

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
26 April 2013 Last updated at 08:55 ET

Schools 'should teach how to view porn', sex forum says

By Judith Burns
BBC News education reporter

Teachers need to know that pornography is not necessarily 'all bad' and can sometimes be 'helpful', a group of sex education experts has suggested.

A new publication advocates pupils being taught how to view pornography in school sex education lessons.

The Sex Education Forum wants pornography taught in terms of "media literacy and representation, gender, sexual behaviour and body image".

Campaigner Lucy Holmes, of No More Page Three, welcomed the idea.

"The more open and honest dialogue we have with young people about sex and porn, the better," said Ms Holmes.

'Mostly unrealistic'
In an online magazine aimed at teachers, the group suggests that pupils as young as five should learn how airbrushing in the media can create unrealistic body expectations, and that sex education lessons for 11-year-olds should include discussion of the dangers of "sexting" - sharing sexual messages and pictures by text.

Pupils aged 14 and over should learn that pornography is acting and not real, that "the sex and bodies are mostly unrealistic", says the magazine.

Teacher Boo Spurgeon, of Forge Valley Community School in Sheffield, told the Sex Educational Supplement: "We know from the facts and figures the average age of starting to watch pornography is about 11.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

We can't get away from [porn] because it's everywhere in society”

Boo Spurgeon
Teacher, Sheffield
"So we need to start mentioning it then in a very normal way, so it's not shock horror."

She added that at Forge Valley teachers refer to pornography when talking about the impact of the media on pupils' perception of their own bodies.

"When we do something about self-esteem we will mention again the impact of the way pornography makes people feel about themselves.

"It's about dropping it in here, dropping it in there, making sure that the students know that we are happy to talk about everything to do with relationships and sex, including the impact of pornography.

"We can't get away from it because it's everywhere in society. It's not just what they find in the internet. It's in the newspapers; Page Three, for example."

Ms Spurgeon's students helped compile a list of what they felt students should learn about pornography. They said that some films could be "helpful" but cautioned that they were not a model for good sex.

In particular, they warned that not everything shown was safe, that porn could be addictive and that some actors were forced into making the films. They added that coercing others into performing or videoing sex acts was unacceptable.

'Casual' attitudes
Lucy Emmerson, co-ordinator of the Sex Education Forum, said the idea of the magazine was to help teachers "offer factually correct information and an opportunity for safe discussion that matches the maturity of the child.

"Teachers have told us they are nervous about mentioning pornography in sex and relationship education, yet given the ease with which children are able to access explicit sexual content on the internet, it is vital that teachers can respond to this reality appropriately.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

To give lessons on pornography is to play with fire”

Norman Wells
Family Education Trust
"In addition, teaching children and young people to be critical consumers of media and able to discuss issues about the body, gender and sexual behaviour will equip them with 'filters in their head' to be more in control of the media available to them."

Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said many parents would be horrified at the prospect of their children being taught about pornography within such a framework: "The intention appears to be to steer children and young people away from a belief in moral absolutes and to encourage them to think that there are no rights and wrongs when it comes to sexual expression.

"To take a no-holds-barred approach to sex education has the potential to break down pupils' natural sense of reserve and to encourage casual attitudes towards sex. If we want children to view sexual intimacy as something valuable, special and worthy of respect, it needs to be addressed with modesty and restraint.

"To give lessons on pornography is to play with fire," said Mr Wells

BBC News - Schools 'should teach how to view porn', sex forum says < click
 
A new publication advocates pupils being taught how to view pornography in school sex education lessons.

The Sex Education Forum wants pornography taught in terms of "media literacy and representation, gender, sexual behaviour and body image".

Campaigner Lucy Holmes, of No More Page Three, welcomed the idea.

"The more open and honest dialogue we have with young people about sex and porn, the better," said Ms Holmes.

BBC News - Schools 'should teach how to view porn', sex forum says < click

Don't take Sex Ed back to the 1950s!

Email your MP now!

The Government's proposed science curriculum threatens to water down existing sex education, not strengthen it. This is the only compulsory sex education in primary school. Vital information about the body and sexual health has been left out. As a result, teachers and parents might think that body parts, puberty and sexual health should not be discussed in the classroom.

This all threatens to turn the classroom clock back to a time when sex was not discussed. It's not fit for the 21st century.

Please email your MP asking them to help stop these changes and support inclusion of the essentials of sex education in the science curriculum. It is really simple to do as you can use the template letter provided.

Sex Education Forum - Working together for quality sex and relationship education. < click
 
School pupils should be taught 'not all porn is bad', advise experts

Teachers should be aware that “not all pornography is bad” when taking sex education classes, according to guidance made available to schools.


Pupils as young as 11 should be taught the dangers of 'sexting' Photo: PA

By Melanie Hall and Graeme Paton10:01PM BST 25 Apr 2013

A publication released by a group of health and children’s charities says that teachers should bear in mind that pornography is “hugely diverse”.

Pupils as young as 11 should be taught the dangers of “sexting” and five-year-olds should know how airbrushing in the media creates unrealistic body image expectations, it says.

Older pupils aged 14 upwards should tackle “real” and “unreal” behaviour in pornography, says the guide, which directs teachers to a list of online resources they can use in lessons.

It suggests using a website called TheSite.org, an advice forum for young people, which tells teenagers that “porn can be great” and aims to tackle a series of “myths” about the subject. “Sex is great. And porn can be great. It’s the idea that porn sex is like real sex which is the problem,” says the website. “But if you can separate the fantasy from the reality you’re much more likely to enjoy both.”

The guide was published by the Sex Education Forum (SEF), a coalition of more than 90 organisations, including the NSPCC and Barnardo’s, established to campaign for better lessons in the subject.

School pupils should be taught 'not all porn is bad', advise experts - Telegraph < click


everything is beta-tested in the UK before it comes to America.
 
Sometimes feel like i'm from another world, children do not need sex education at school they need chastity taught at home.
 
Since we are not suppose to have sex before marriage a person has plenty of time to do their own research. What should be taught in schools is the consequences of sex and the courage to say no.
 
and here I was thinking what should be taught in schools is academics...:rolleyes: