Ok to be lesbian?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

danschance

Guest
Homo's and Lesbians 5 cities I know of destroyed because of it. Well make it six ( New Orleans) and I fear that Vegas is next. Unless there are some saved people praying in that city.
The bible says Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed for wickedness, not just homosexuality.

49Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. 50They were haughty and did an abomination before me. So I removed them, when I saw it. Ez. 16:49-50
Here God lists the sins of Soddom and Gomorah. They are:
1) Pride
2) Haughty
3) Glutony
4) Ignored the needy
5) And did abominations.

So it is not accurate to say God destroyed those cities simply over homosexuality alone.
 
K

Kerry

Guest
The bible says Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed for wickedness, not just homosexuality.



Here God lists the sins of Soddom and Gomorah. They are:
1) Pride
2) Haughty
3) Glutony
4) Ignored the needy
5) And did abominations.

So it is not accurate to say God destroyed those cities simply over homosexuality alone.
I agree with the wickedness. But, Lot offered his virgin daughters and the men didn't want them, they wanted the men that came in his house who were angels.
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
Recently I have know about those who viewed "this" as not sin... They have there reason to cope with it (insatisfassion or lust) Though, the good new, for them is there are men and people who could help if THEY allow (themselves).

This week, someone of my siblings told me her daugther was vieded as "rare". She told me her friends are that kind who go, in bed, with two boys (or girls). These fiends of her told her: you are "rare" (and more). The truth is I told her mother (because she is not going to know that I know her problems): SHE IS NOT RARE at all, just the oppoiste, because her friends are so promiscuos, the way they don{ t mind to sleep with their boyfriends, but also her friends (these of my family aren{ t converted yet, but their fruits are holier than some I think I know).

I'm glad some of my family guard their life. :)
 
D

danschance

Guest
I agree with the wickedness. But, Lot offered his virgin daughters and the men didn't want them, they wanted the men that came in his house who were angels.
Yes, homosexuality was practiced in those cities. In my previous post I listed 5 sins God accused them of doing. The last in that list was "and did abominations" and I feel certain that includes homosexuality. Judy 7 lists homosexuality as a sin they commited also. Still, I wanted to point out that homosexuality was not their only sin.
 
H

HisBeloved1

Guest
Secularhermit:

This is absolute Truth to those claims.
They are very clear in what they say.

Look up these following Scriptures

Leviticus 18:21-22
Leviticus 20:13
Romans 1:26-27
1Corinthians 6:9-10

There is no misunderstanding.

The Good News for them should they choose, is this:

1Corinthians 6-11
Romans 5-8
Genesis 1:27
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
I agree with the wickedness. But, Lot offered his virgin daughters and the men didn't want them, they wanted the men that came in his house who were angels.
First they were angels not men. IE Strange flesh. Male on male rape does NOT mean the men were homosexual. Male on male rape was and is still used as a WEAPON OF WARFARE.

Historically, the rape of males was more widely recognized in ancient times. Several of the legends in Greek mythology involved abductions and sexual assaults of males by other males or gods. The rape of a defeated male enemy was considered the special right of the victorious soldier in some societies and was a signal of the totality of the defeat. There was a widespread belief that a male who was sexually penetrated, even if it was by forced sexual assault, thus "lost his manhood," and could no longer be a warrior or ruler. Gang rape of a male was considered an ultimate form of punishment and, as such, was known to the Romans as punishment for adultery and the Persians and Iranians as punishment for violation of the sanctity of the harem (Donaldson, 1990).


Alliance: Factsheets: Male Rape
 
P

phil112

Guest
........... Male on male rape does NOT mean the men were homosexual. Male on male rape was and is still used as a WEAPON OF WARFARE.

There was no warfare involved in this. It was simply an act of attempting to serve deviant lusts. You do understand that God destroyed them for their homosexuality, and not because they were "warriors", don't you?
 
P

phil112

Guest
First they were angels not men. IE Strange flesh. ...........
Sarah, those wicked men didn't know they were angels. They only saw them as someone they had not yet had the pleasure of defiling.
the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: [SUP] [/SUP]And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
14,969
99
48
The bible says Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed for wickedness, not just homosexuality.



Here God lists the sins of Soddom and Gomorah. They are:
1) Pride
2) Haughty
3) Glutony
4) Ignored the needy
5) And did abominations.

So it is not accurate to say God destroyed those cities simply over homosexuality alone.
Thanks for that awareness, people that take away others free choice is waht God was and id mad about today, it is in genesis 6, where he regretted making us, seeing all the evil that spread throughout the land and only found Noah as righteous, who believed God and did not plan evil against anyone. People have done that ever since the fall, being born sons of Adam not son's of God. that is what Jesus came to do through the cross to give us life as son's of God in the Spirit of God and this is completed in the resurrected Christ, and we all must go through death first in and to ourselves to possibly see this new life gift from Father through Son
The difference of flesh dead Spirit and the living Spirit of God (love) in the purest form as in 1 Cor 13:4-13
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
14,969
99
48
I agree with the wickedness. But, Lot offered his virgin daughters and the men didn't want them, they wanted the men that came in his house who were angels.
Yep it was about taking others as they wished without anyone else consenting to it. The taking away of another free will is what God is pissed about you think, it goes much deeper than homosexuality
Don't we all have free will and so to take away another is plain down right not right is it?
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
14,969
99
48
Yes, homosexuality was practiced in those cities. In my previous post I listed 5 sins God accused them of doing. The last in that list was "and did abominations" and I feel certain that includes homosexuality. Judy 7 lists homosexuality as a sin they commited also. Still, I wanted to point out that homosexuality was not their only sin.
It was harming others not caring for what others thought, taking others captive against their free will
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
14,969
99
48
First they were angels not men. IE Strange flesh. Male on male rape does NOT mean the men were homosexual. Male on male rape was and is still used as a WEAPON OF WARFARE.

Historically, the rape of males was more widely recognized in ancient times. Several of the legends in Greek mythology involved abductions and sexual assaults of males by other males or gods. The rape of a defeated male enemy was considered the special right of the victorious soldier in some societies and was a signal of the totality of the defeat. There was a widespread belief that a male who was sexually penetrated, even if it was by forced sexual assault, thus "lost his manhood," and could no longer be a warrior or ruler. Gang rape of a male was considered an ultimate form of punishment and, as such, was known to the Romans as punishment for adultery and the Persians and Iranians as punishment for violation of the sanctity of the harem (Donaldson, 1990).


Alliance: Factsheets: Male Rape
Thank you fro this insight in what was actually happening in that day
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
[SUP]22 [/SUP]Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

If a woman reads this she will understand that it is ok to be lesbian.
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
There was no warfare involved in this. It was simply an act of attempting to serve deviant lusts. You do understand that God destroyed them for their homosexuality, and not because they were "warriors", don't you?

You MISSED the point. NOT all acts of male on male sex is BECAUSE the ones doing so ARE HOMOSEXUAL. By the way the children ALSO were destroyed. Were the CHILDREN destroyed because THEY WERE HOMOSEXUAL? That is in essence what you are saying is that 2 and 3 year old children are doing homosexual acts. Were the WOMEN also involved in that incident too? You can NOT take a SINGLE example of the wickedness of the city and try to APPLY IT to all within the city.