The "gift of tongues" as per 1Corinthians is not the same thing as the different operations of tongues. The Holy Spirit is the source of both, and gives the utterance to both. However, one operation of tongues is evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit, which is thought of as receiving a car battery, powering the power locks, the power windows, and it is the power supply that initially starts the car. My point is very specific, everyone in the book of Acts that received the Holy Spirit had spoken in tongues, which we will examine in just a moment. This was the evidence of having received the battery.
The exhaust coming out of the running car did not start the car, it is simply proof that the car is running.
Now, having received the Holy Spirit, evidenced by speaking in tongues, which EVERYONE had done because they received the battery (the Holy Spirit). Therefore, now having the battery, they then became a candidate to receive the "GIFTS" of the spirit as per 1Corinthians (one of which is the gift of tongues).
The differences are as follows:
1. the "gift of tongues" (1Corinthians 12:10 - this is the one that everybody talks about)
2. intercession (Romans 8:26 - speaking in tongues through intercessory prayer)
3. upon first receiving the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:4 - initially receiving the car battery)
Lets examine these and begin with the book of Corinthians:
1 Corinthians 12:7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
[8] For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;
[9] To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;
[10] To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:
Tongues and the interpretation takes place within a gathering of believers, usually taking place in church. Being moved by the Holy Spirit, a person stands up, speaks in tongues and sits down. A second person then stands up, speaks in tongues and sits down, and so a third. Then comes the interpretation. This is all done in an orderly fashion. The message is for time and place, and is for the edification of that body of believers.
However, that is not the only mode of tongues, and thereby controversy through misunderstanding. Lets turn to the book of Romans:
Romans 8:26 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
This speaks of an intercessory mode of tongues. With this we make intercessory prayer, and have confidence that our prayers are in God’s will.
Intercessory tongues is a mode or operation whereby the spirit moves. The Holy Spirit giving the utterance. This is something on a personal level, meeting a personal need, either for us or interceeding on someone's behalf.
The amazing thing about tongues, is that the Lord wants us to know it is available to everyone that has, or will have, the Holy Spirit as seen in the book of Acts. Which brings us to speaking in tongues as initial evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit the Bible way:
Acts 2:1 And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
[2] And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
[3] And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
[4] And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
Throughout the book of Acts, everyone that received the Holy spirit had received with speaking in tongues as the spirit gave the utterance. Now, within the controversy there are some quick to point out a few scriptures whereby it is simply not recorded either one way or the other. However, they cannot provide a single scripture that says someone failed to speak in tongues. We do have tons of scripture that folks did speak in tongues, but simply a non-statement does NOT mean that anyone has not spoken, it is simply not mentioned.
Here is a scriptural example:
This is an account of the exact same event. Only one account offers more information than the other. See if you can spot it:
Matthew 26:51 And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear.
John 18:10 Then Simon Peter having a sword drew it, and smote the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. The servant's name was Malchus.
You are correct, it was John that lists the name of the servant who's ear was smote off, AND lists the name of the person that had drew the sword. We have observed that the other scripture did not mention these facts, but where it is not mentioned does not mean that it did not happen.
Lets continue and find out how we can receive what God has offered to us:
Acts 2:12 And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What meaneth this?
[13] Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine.
[14] But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of Judaea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken to my words:
[15] For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day.
[16] But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel;
[17] And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:
[18] And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy:
Acts 2:37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
[38] Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
[39] For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
To apply Jesus death, burial, and resurrection, we need to do exactly what Peter said to do...
1. Death = Repent
2. Burial = water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins
3. Resurrection = Holy Spirit
Romans 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
[5] For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
I have spoken to people from around the world and find it amazing, those that do not speak in tongues, presume to be the foremost authority on the subject. Please don't let anyone tell you that you cannot receive something, that God himself, has waiting.
God Bless!
i will discuss my viewpoint but i will not debate and even if we disagree we still walk as brethren in the Lord and Sister in the Lord we should not be in discord but unity 
