-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L
That's why they call it evidence it is a proof... How can you prove something without a proof?
And i think it's biblical - if u trace the history of the early church in the book of Acts - most of the people Baptized in the Holy Spirit are followed with an evidence that they do speak in tongues. so it is a physical evidence.
And i think it's biblical - if u trace the history of the early church in the book of Acts - most of the people Baptized in the Holy Spirit are followed with an evidence that they do speak in tongues. so it is a physical evidence.
L
You do not have to if you are not baptized. But if you are enabled by the Holy Spirit - why not?
I have a question for you livingbygrace - Do you accept that speaking in tongues is an evidence of Baptism in the Holy Spirit? if not - do you have biblical reference for it? or just disprove that speaking in tongues is not an evidence in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
I have a question for you livingbygrace - Do you accept that speaking in tongues is an evidence of Baptism in the Holy Spirit? if not - do you have biblical reference for it? or just disprove that speaking in tongues is not an evidence in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
You do not have to if you are not baptized. But if you are enabled by the Holy Spirit - why not?
I have a question for you livingbygrace - Do you accept that speaking in tongues is an evidence of Baptism in the Holy Spirit? if not - do you have biblical reference for it? or just disprove that speaking in tongues is not an evidence in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
I have a question for you livingbygrace - Do you accept that speaking in tongues is an evidence of Baptism in the Holy Spirit? if not - do you have biblical reference for it? or just disprove that speaking in tongues is not an evidence in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit
L
Well you've said it...
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
Well you've said it...
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
It can be AN evidence, but is not A NECCESSARY EVIDENCE that someone has been baptised in the Spirit
Please quote fully what was meant
C
Acts2:4And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
5And there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, from every nation under heaven. 6And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were confused, because everyone heard them speak in his own language. 7Then they were all amazed and marveled, saying to one another, “Look, are not all these who speak Galileans? 8And how is it that we hear, each in our own language in which we were born? 9Parthians and Medes and Elamites, those dwelling in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, 10Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya adjoining Cyrene, visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, 11Cretans and Arabs—we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God.” 12So they were all amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, “Whatever could this mean?”
so many quote this scripture as required proof of having received Act 2:4 only , lets read it in context to what was happening and how that miracle brought thousands to the Lord in itself, wish people would not use it as evidence as if a pre requisite of having received please
In due respect,
Sorry for that - i do it to point my point - that you do agree with me that speaking in tongues is an evidence of being Baptized in the Holy Spirit...
That's why I conclude...
Therefore, speaking in tongues is really an evidence of being Baptized in the Holy Spirit...
Sorry for that - i do it to point my point - that you do agree with me that speaking in tongues is an evidence of being Baptized in the Holy Spirit...
That's why I conclude...
Therefore, speaking in tongues is really an evidence of being Baptized in the Holy Spirit...
did Jesus and his apostles spoke in tongues,when they were babtised??
Well you've said it...
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
satan can copy that: how do you know it is genuine?
Well you've said it...
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
So therefore speaking in tongues is the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit -
What i'm trying to point is - there's nothing wrong in believing that the evidence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is through speaking in tongues - nothing more - nothing less -
and why not - it is what the Bible presented - Acts 2:4,
as i have said ; speaking in tongues and the other gives can be copied by satan: exept knowledge and truth he can not copy.
C
amen - love not if they speak in tongues
Gal 5:22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law. 24And those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. 25If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. 26Let us not become conceited, provoking one another, envying one another.