Bible Miniseries on History Channel

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#21
I can almost say for certain that there will be no books of the Apocrypha included in the series.
I'm not so sure. I've seen other documentaries that the History channel has done on the Bible and I distinctly recall there being the additions to Daniel included in their dramatization as well as the Book of Maccabees.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#22
SantoSubito, I haven't read The Maccabees yet (I've never before read the Apocrypha) but in a sentence or two can you describe what's so good about them? Thanks
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#23
SantoSubito, I haven't read The Maccabees yet (I've never before read the Apocrypha) but in a sentence or two can you describe what's so good about them? Thanks
In TV terms theres a lot of political drama (Rome even gets involved), an underdog story of Jewish rebels throwing out the Seleucid empire, the institution of Hanukkah, and Judas Maccabeus and sons which gives you a hero(s) . So it would make for good TV just like the history sections of the Bible which this series will no doubt focus on.

Ultimately though what makes it in is down to the religious persuasions (or lack therof) of the higher ups at the History channel.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#24
Cheers! I'm reading the Apocrypha for the first time. I loved Bel and the Dragon, thought bits and pieces of Tobit were good and I'm half-way through Judith.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
58
0
#25
The History Channels-(1&2), as well as the Learning Channel and Discovery have a bad history of
liberal theology.
I.E. - Making Jesus out to be little more than a revolutionary political figure.
I'll pass......(I have the bible).
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#26
Some of their stuff has a better track record than that Noah mini-series from awhile back. Do you remember how there was a merchant who somehow survived the flood? Noah's wife bought the penguin a straw hat! And that wasn't the worst of it. *Groan*
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#27
Cheers! I'm reading the Apocrypha for the first time. I loved Bel and the Dragon, thought bits and pieces of Tobit were good and I'm half-way through Judith.
The Prayer of Azariah, The Song of the Three Holy Children, Susanna and the Elders, and Bel and the Dragon make much more sense when read in their proper (in my mind) places in Daniel. Tobit is probably my favorite and most read book after John's Gospel.

Also I forgot to mention that 3 Maccabees (included in the Orthodox canon, but excluded from the Catholic canon) isn't actualy about the Maccabees. It's basically a treatise on wisdom (kind of like the Wisdom of Solomon).
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#28
Thanks! In my study Bible The Song of the Three Holy Children is called The Song of the Three Jews. I'll try to read the rest in their proper order. It's interesting that you enjoyed Tobit so much. I enjoyed the beginning and the end and a little in the middle but for the most part I found the middle to be tedious. I wonder why?
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#29
Thanks! In my study Bible The Song of the Three Holy Children is called The Song of the Three Jews. I'll try to read the rest in their proper order. It's interesting that you enjoyed Tobit so much. I enjoyed the beginning and the end and a little in the middle but for the most part I found the middle to be tedious. I wonder why?
Oh and Esther has six additional chapters. Which are either placed at the end of Esther (Vulgate order) or interspersed throughout (Septuagint order).

Honestly I would just pick up a cheap copy of The Jerusalem Bible (the translation used by the Catholic Church in Australia), or a copy of the NRSV-CE to read the additions in their proper place.

You could also consider the New American Bible (used by the Catholic Church in the US), but I figure it'd be weird for an Australian to have a Bible with the word "American" in it.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#30
You could also consider the New American Bible (used by the Catholic Church in the US), but I figure it'd be weird for an Australian to have a Bible with the word "American" in it.

I'm glad you're not the only one to realise this truth. :)

Thanks for your help. My study Bible is the Harper Collins NRSV but with the Apocryphal books included. I've no problem with flipping back and forth to read the books in their correct order (which it lists in the introduction).
 

pickles

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2009
14,479
182
63
#31
I will say that they haven't been all bad. Their documentary on the Shroud of Turin convinced practically every slightly religious person that watched it that the Shroud is real (which I believe it is anyway).
:) I know this, it is just sad that some will accept what is said , but the truth is, they accept because they refuse the truth.
I do like many of the programs, I just would like to see the facts spoken to more accuratly, so those that are seeking, will not be misled. :)

God bless:)
pickles
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#32
You could also consider the New American Bible (used by the Catholic Church in the US), but I figure it'd be weird for an Australian to have a Bible with the word "American" in it.

I'm glad you're not the only one to realise this truth. :)
It's just a Catholic rip off of the NIV, but seeing how "New International Version" was already taken, and the fact that no one outside the US uses it we got stuck with NAB, which is constantly being confused with the NASB.

I even met a baptist woman once that had an NAB published by Oxford, but she was convinced she had an NASB.

Thanks for your help. My study Bible is the Harper Collins NRSV but with the Apocryphal books included. I've no problem with flipping back and forth to read the books in their correct order (which it lists in the introduction).
How is the Harper Collins study Bible by the way? I have a New Oxford Annotated Bible (RSV with Apocrypha), but It's getting to the point where I need to replace it.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#33
I only bought the study Bible a week or so ago but so far it's very good. The commentary addresses specific contexts - historical, cultural, literary, but it has little if any theological commentary context.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
C

cfultz3

Guest
#34
It is so good, I have made it my signature until Monday :0
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#36
I greatly dislike Hulu. Only for Americans? This is the Internet!
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#37
I dislike them too because they push homo movies. That's why I ONLY use them for their free movies and ONLY the old Samurai movies, political movies that are appropriate, orthodox Christian movies, or rare movie that's OK to watch. I give them zero money.

Anyways, this Lee Strobel movie was good. Maybe it's on Youtube. I didn't check.

I greatly dislike Hulu. Only for Americans? This is the Internet!
 

Radius

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2013
1,138
180
63
#38
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#39
i saw the first episode tonight and i thought it was very good...

other than some nitpicking that i have to do because i majored in history...my only complaint is that there were a few gratuitous sword fights that are not in the bible...

overall the bible and faith in God were represented very positively and pretty accurately...
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
#40
I agree with Rachel. I thought it was good, some poetic license here and there but it was good.