Billy Graham, Charles Finney and Pelagius

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

KelbyofGod

Senior Member
Oct 8, 2017
1,881
717
113
#41
BTW, did my last post come out super big? If so, it wasn't intentional.
 

KelbyofGod

Senior Member
Oct 8, 2017
1,881
717
113
#43

thanks; it's a subject that's tossed about in my mind for a long time, being refined.
:p
Mine too, but I'd not come up with the words to make the clear distinction.

Having read your post, I'm surprised that "believe-only' folks weren't jumping all over the very fact you pointed out.

If salvation is a "believe-only" thing...then what are the actions of walking down the aisle, raising your hand, and/or reciting a "sinner's prayer"... except WORKS?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,471
12,942
113
#44
If salvation is a "believe-only" thing...then what are the actions of walking down the aisle, raising your hand, and/or reciting a "sinner's prayer"... except WORKS?
That is quite a superficial way to look at this issue. Responding to the Gospel through faith and repentance cannot be considered works. So everything you have mentioned is simply a response to the Gospel. It is similar to Christ telling those fishermen to drop their nets and follow Him, and their doing so immediately. Were they saved by works because they responded to Christ? When Levi/Matthew the tax collector dropped everything to follow Jesus, was that a work, or was it a response of faith?

When the Gospel is preached, people are exhorted to respond to the Gospel. John the Baptizer exhorted people in the same fashion. That is perfectly legitimate, whether they raise their hands, walk down the aisle, or say the sinner's prayer. You seem to imply that this is all illegitimate, whereas it is not. But you will generally hear Reformed Christians mocking at this, even though they have no Scriptural basis for their mockery.

Having said that, there are many things which Billy Graham (for example) did which were completely illegitimate, such as involving Catholic clergy in his crusades, and failing to direct new believers strictly to Bible-believing churches which would provide for believers' baptism, and teach Bible truth and Gospel truth rather than Catholic or other doctrine.

As to attempting to connect Mr. Graham with Charles Finney and then to Pelagius, that is simply an attempt to smear Christians. We should have better things to occupy us than smear tactics.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,471
12,942
113
#46
things such as searching the scripture, looking for the testimony of Christ in it, right?
Since you bring it up, the testimony of Christ includes His judgments on evildoers and ungodliness. The testimony of Christ during the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah were His fiery judgments. If you cannot see that, then you are seeing only half the picture. The entire book of Judges is a condemnation of a nation which was NOT under God. So the testimony of Christ was the subjugation of the Israelities by the Philistines over and over again. Now let me ask you if this Scripture is a testimony of Christ or not?

And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#47
things such as searching the scripture, looking for the testimony of Christ in it, right?
Smearing BG, Finney, and Pelagius? Is showing others their true colors a smear tactic? I trow(I tossed in a KJV word, will not cost you any extra, btw) not.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,672
13,131
113
#48
Since you bring it up, the testimony of Christ includes His judgments on evildoers and ungodliness. The testimony of Christ during the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah were His fiery judgments. If you cannot see that, then you are seeing only half the picture. The entire book of Judges is a condemnation of a nation which was NOT under God. So the testimony of Christ was the subjugation of the Israelities by the Philistines over and over again. Now let me ask you if this Scripture is a testimony of Christ or not?

And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
And the LORD struck Benjamin before Israel, so that the sons of Israel destroyed 25,100 men of Benjamin that day, all who draw the sword.
(Judges 20:35)

He is not "
absent"
He is present, and working: and His working is salvation, redemption, the destruction of sin and the preservation of His chosen ones.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,471
12,942
113
#49
...He is not "absent"...
You continue to keep missing the point. God was absent from the hearts and minds of the Israelites.

11 And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and served Baalim:

12
And they forsook the LORD God of their fathers, which brought them out of the land of Egypt, and followed other gods, of the gods of the people that were round about them, and bowed themselves unto them, and provoked the LORD to anger.


13
And they forsook the LORD, and served Baal and Ashtaroth. (Judges 2:11-13)


Otherwise the Book of Judges would have shown righteousness, godliness, harmony, and true worship. What we see there is the exact opposite, so was Satan running the show or God? Even the destruction of Benjamin was essentially contrary to the will of God for the 12 tribes.




 
Last edited:

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,367
2,444
113
#50
Philippians 1:18
What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.



We might want to consider the efficacy of holding to sound doctrine while also walking back some of our hostility.









 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#51
Philippians 1:18
What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.



We might want to consider the efficacy of holding to sound doctrine while also walking back some of our hostility.









I hope ppl do not take my postings as me being hostile. I am just speaking my peace(or is it piece?) about what BG, Finney, and Pelagius have advocated.
 

KelbyofGod

Senior Member
Oct 8, 2017
1,881
717
113
#52
That is quite a superficial way to look at this issue. Responding to the Gospel through faith and repentance cannot be considered works.

...(skipping parts)...

When the Gospel is preached, people are exhorted to respond to the Gospel. John the Baptizer exhorted people in the same fashion. That is perfectly legitimate, whether they raise their hands, walk down the aisle, or say the sinner's prayer. You seem to imply that this is all illegitimate, whereas it is not.
To be honest, my implication wasn't that those actions aren't valid. Each obviously accomplishes something. My implication was that there really isn't a "believe-only" salvation (if it includes any action by the person, including confession.). It's always "belief-plus the required action(s)"... the disagreement just arises over what is required in the "plus actions" part. Whether we call those actions or works really doesn't matter to me. They're still in addition to belief...and they're still required.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,045
13,052
113
58
#53
Here's a transcript from Robert Schuller's 'Hour of Power' program. You can find the video of this on youtube, btw...These two guys are/were pure mystics.

Billy Graham Believes Catholic Doctrine of Salvation Without Bible, Gospel, or Name of Christby Robert E. Kofahl, Ph.D
Television interview of Billy Graham by Robert Schuller. Part 1, an approximately 7-minute-long broadcast in Southern California on Saturday, May 31, 1997. The following is an exact transcript* of an excerpt close to the end of this broadcast.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]Schuller:[/TD]
[TD]Tell me, what do you think is the future of Christianity?

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 12%"]Graham:[/TD]
[TD="width: 88%"]Well, Christianity and being a true believer--you know, I think there's the Body of Christ. This comes from all the Christian groups around the world, outside the Christian groups. I think everybody that loves Christ, or knows Christ, whether they're conscious of it or not, they're members of the Body of Christ. And I don't think that we're going to see a great sweeping revival, that will turn the whole world to Christ at any time. I think James answered that, the Apostle James in the first council in Jerusalem, when he said that God's purpose for this age is to call out a people for His name. And that's what God is doing today, He's calling people out of the world for His name, whether they come from the Muslim world, or the Buddhist world, or the Christian world or the non-believing world, they are members of the Body of Christ because they've been called by God. They may not even know the name of Jesus but they know in their hearts that they need something that they don't have, and they turn to the only light that they have, and I think that they are saved, and that they're going to be with us in heaven.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 12%"]Schuller:[/TD]
[TD="width: 88%"]What, what I hear you saying that it's possible for Jesus Christ to come into human hearts and soul and life, even if they've been born in darkness and have never had exposure to the Bible. Is that a correct interpretation of what you're saying?

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 12%"]Graham:[/TD]
[TD="width: 88%"]Yes, it is, because I believe that. I've met people in various parts of the world in tribal situations, that they have never seen a Bible or heard about a Bible, and never heard of Jesus, but they've believed in their hearts that there was a God, and they've tried to live a life that was quite apart from the surrounding community in which they lived.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 12%"]Schuller:[/TD]
[TD="width: 88%"][R. S. trips over his tongue for a moment, his face beaming, then says] I'm so thrilled to hear you say this. There's a wideness in God's mercy.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 12%"]Graham:[/TD]
[TD="width: 88%"]There is. There definitely is.





[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Very disturbing conversation between Graham and Schuller! :eek:
 

EarnestQ

Senior Member
Apr 28, 2016
2,588
310
83
#54
i have a different, and what i consider a bigger issue with Finney, and it's one with which i think we ought to all see an immediate correlation with Graham. for some of you reading this, my post may sting. sorry.

the idea that salvation is accomplished by the recitation of a magical set of words ((i.e. the 'sinner's prayer')) in response to an emotional 'altar call' after a sermon purpose-built to manipulatively tug at the heart-strings of attendees at a large meeting. and the idea that the size of a list of names which responded in this way to this kind of event constitutes 'revival'

the whole idea of an emotional 'altar call' and subsequent formulaic verbal agreement constituting a 'salvation event' either originates with or was first popularized by Finney. travelling 'revival' shows. well-rehearsed speeches designed to elicit emotional response. the idea that men and women can be deliberately manipulated into saving faith by clever, silver-tongued, practiced evangelists.

Are you saying that the Holy Spirit is not moving people to confess their sins, repent and turn to God?

What do you propose as an alternative?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#55
"Whether they're conscious of it or not, they're part of the body of Christ." Srsly? No wonder our churches are in such the hot mess they're in.

I was watching a Billy Graham crusade from Houston from 1981. I was helping my wife in the kitchen, so I didn't get to hear the whole message, but what I heard of it, it sounded pretty solid. He preached on the cross, repentance, the need of forgiveness of sin, &c. As it was going off, he had given his alter call, and as the credits were rolling down the screen, they were showing ppl coming down from their seats, and some were smiling and nudging each other as they were coming forward. That's just awful. You mean to tell me that ppl who are coming to the Christ are horsing around? When the Lord got a hold on me, man, I was a wreck. I was bawling like a baby, seeing I had offended a thrice holy God. I guess conviction of sins means different things to different folks. :rolleyes:
I have a personal friend who went to one of his crusades.....he preached the people to the point of explaining the gospel message and then had an altar call without finishing the deal....at the altar he had representatives from numerous so called Christian denominations.....This is what caused my friend to start really scrutinizing the SBC.....I have an uncle who is a SBC preacher and he opens his pulpit every fourth Sunday for different denominations, He also believes allowing any and all to take the Lord's supper when they have it and they really went astray on many solid biblical doctrines.......ecumenical to the core....

*DISCLAIMER* NOT SAYING ALL who are in the SBC are like this or sold out to these things.......I know there are some who are solid on the truth.
 
Last edited:
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#56
Ohhhhh!! I had not heard this. Anything to elicit a response I guess. :rolleyes: :(
The church I grew up on was instructed to do this. Some of my family were involved. The "going forward" of the many from churches was showy and designed to draw others. It made it appear as if thousands were going forward for salvation.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#57
We should have better things to occupy us than smear tactics.
Wow, you said that, really? A vast amount of your time here is spent to do this to others, particularly the Reformed folks. This is a well known fact. Does this mean you're going to quit attacking them with ignorance of facts and your straw man antics?
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#59
I may have this wrong, but I thought the lord had his commandments written on our heart, so people in these deep tribal situations would know there is a god and know how to follow him, with out having scriptures in their possession. Like the tribe of the Andaman Island, who no one has been able to contact.
So then they'd be saved by keeping the law?
 

longtrekker

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
396
194
43
#60
.
I for one believe Mr. Graham has brought a great many to Christ.

[SUP]Mark Chapter 9

38 [/SUP]And John answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbad him, because he followeth not us.

[SUP]39 [/SUP]But Jesus said, Forbid him not: for there is no man which shall do a miracle in my name, that can lightly speak evil of me.
[SUP]40 [/SUP]For he that is not against us is on our part.