Calvinism and Tulip theology

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
#21
[video=youtube;zcSlcNfThUA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcSlcNfThUA[/video]
 

TMS

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2015
3,569
1,066
113
Australia
#22
You're missing the point. You're right. We were slaves to sin. Since when does a slave get choice?

You're right. Jesus set us free. Notice, Jesus did that. We did not.

Every scripture you cited proved Total Depravity and yet you keep declaring "we have a choice."

What does "redeemed" mean to you? The product chooses to hop onto the checkout belt and pay for itself?
:confused:
Jesus set us free from slavery and as a free being i have a choice.
A choice to accept Jesus as my new master or to serve the flesh.

I know from personal experience that there is a war going on inside me. Sometimes i givein to the flesh and sometimes to the Spirit. The difference is whether i try to do it alone or i surrender to God and allow The Spirit to gain the victory for me.
God has let me make both choices and experienced both results.
On my own I'm totally depraved but with Jesus i am able to overcome.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#23
[video=youtube;zcSlcNfThUA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcSlcNfThUA[/video]

That poor guy either needs to get off the drugs he is on or increase the dosage because they are not working like they should.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,188
113
#24
Jesus set us free from slavery and as a free being i have a choice.
A choice to accept Jesus as my new master or to serve the flesh.

I know from personal experience that there is a war going on inside me. Sometimes i givein to the flesh and sometimes to the Spirit. The difference is whether i try to do it alone or i surrender to God and allow The Spirit to gain the victory for me.
God has let me make both choices and experienced both results.
On my own I'm totally depraved but with Jesus i am able to overcome.
That's the whole point.

What choice was available to you before you came to Christ?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#25
Laurence M Vance wrote "The Other Side of Calvinism" which lays out the issue in great detail. ISBN 0-9628898-7-3. Not light reading but a great study source.

Now all men must make a choice for Christ. Men received the ability to do so because one result of the fall in the garden was receiving the knowledge of good and evil. So while we are dead in trespass and sin Christ in the Spirit of God has lighted every man that has come into the world. John 3 shows that men see the light and turn from it because their deeds are evil.

Much of what is said about Calvinism is what another believes Calvin intended in his treatise. Many of those were enemies of Calvin so he was not interpreted in the most favorable light.

No man is saved of his own accord but God draws him through the Holy Spirit and the word of God to Christ. Man still makes the choice to receive or reject. It is Christ that does the saving and not the will of man.

As far as election goes we are elect in Christ. Israel is elect among the nations. So who is elect is determined according to the context of the passage.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#26
I've never heard of the term Theodicy, i googled it, alot of this stuff answers my questions good stuff. Thanks brother

I read an article about it and I agree with it, I can honestly admit i DO have a sense of entitlement for humanity, meaning I want everyone given a fair chance at salvation etc. Overall, im concerned with fairness in every regard, but God's fairness can be different to mine I realize that, its just a hard pil to swallow.
You really don't want God's fairness if you think about it bro because that entails justice. What we want and desire are His mercies and grace. If we all got what was fair we'd all be doomed. And don't fall into the Socinian error of thinking that God's ways have to meet the qualifications of finite human reason, nor remain perplexed about the awesome nature of God or His ways.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#27
If do not think that the perseverance of the saints claims "you will be saved no matter what you do, if you are elect. That would be unbiblical and just wrong.
That would be the definition of Antinomianism better known today as the system called Free Grace Theology. It has nothing to do with Reformed theology and is the extreme opposite.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,426
3,478
113
#28
Calvinism
Calvinism (also called the Reformed tradition', Reformed Christianity, Reformed Protestantism, or the Reformed faith) is a major branch of protestantism that follows the theological tradition and forms of Christian practice of John Calvin and other Reformation-ear theology.
Calvinists broke from the Roman Catholic Church in the 16th century. Calvinism differs from Lutherans on the real presence of Christ in the the eucharist, theroies of worship, and the use of God's Law for believers, among other things. Its basic principle is that the Bible is to be interpreted by itself, meaning the parts that are harder to understand are examined in the light of other passages where the Bible is more explicit on the matter. The term Calvinism can be misleading, because the religious tradition which it denotes has always been diverse, with a wide range of influences rather than a single founder. The movement was first called Calvinism by Lutherans who opposed it, and many within the tradition would prefer to use the word Reformed.

Most objections to, and attacks on Calvinism focus on the "five points of Calvinism," also called the doctrines of grace, and remembered by the acronym "TULIP." The five points were more recently popularized in the 1963 booklet The Five Points of Calvinism Defined, Defended, Documented by David N. Steele and Curtis C. Thomas. The origins of the five points and the acronym are uncertain.
The "five points of Calvinism," even if they are (or are not) what John Calvin taught are very much preached in churches today.
Are the TULIP doctrines correct?
· Total depravity
· Unconditional election
· Limited atonement
· Irresistible grace
· Preseverance of the saints
I reject all the 5 pillars of calvinism.. I believe calvinism is false..
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#29
Yes, I believe in the TULIP theory, although it wasn't created by Calvin, but was used in remonstrance iirc against arminian error.

But there are issues with the terms, for example Total Depravity, some will say they are not totally depraved. I get it, but that isn't what the "T" actually is teaching so dig a little deeper than just scratching the surface.

Also, Irresistible Grace, people will say "A ha, we can resist grace...you're wrong!" (as if they're somehow proud of what they should be ashamed). Dig a little deeper, it is in relation to the elect, that God will seek them out and they will be saved, they will not always resist His grace.
Just a question to the last point....

MANY are called, but few chosen.

How does irresistible grace fit with the above verse?
 

Marano

Senior Member
Dec 7, 2011
398
32
28
29
#30
The doctrines of grace are simply what humans call the gospel these days, they were simply understood to be the gospel in the days of the early church, that's why the reformation aims to go back to those days in terms of theology.
 

Marano

Senior Member
Dec 7, 2011
398
32
28
29
#31
Unconditional salvation. If that mean righteousness by faith alone i agree. We can't earn salvation but we do need faith.
This point "Limited Atonement", is the one i can't accept. If God only died for a selected few, and we have no choice about it, than that is a God i don't want to worship and that is not a God of Love. Jesus's death was enough for all sinners atonement because Jesus is God and was the creator of all. And to teach that His death was measured out and only worth the life of the selected ones takes away from His divine worth. The God i worship loves all sinners and wants to save all sinners.
God is love yes, but he is also just and holy, you're limiting God if you think love is the only attribute He has.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#32
Just a question to the last point....

MANY are called, but few chosen.

How does irresistible grace fit with the above verse?
Hey bro, I'll get back to this later if I don't forget. Also, which verse are you referring to?
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#33
The doctrines of grace are simply what humans call the gospel these days, they were simply understood to be the gospel in the days of the early church, that's why the reformation aims to go back to those days in terms of theology.
You're exactly correct, teh DoG are the true doctrines of the Gospel. John MacArthur crystallized this in his book 'The Gospel According to Jesus". Since the church wasn't accustomed to hearing the truth some vehemenently attacked JM and called the gospel "Lordship Salvation' a term he didn't coin. Also around the same time Chuck Swindoll came out with 'The Grace Aswakening" which crystallizes FGT and antinomianism, the polar opposite of the transforming Gospel. Of course the latter is a DTS alumnus so that is the false teaching being taught at DTS. It started with Lewis Sperry Chafer. On a more personal note I know of a professor at Dallas Baptist University who teaches that salvation is a personal achievement that we should boast in. His proof text is Jeremiah 9:24.

Anyhow, this/these error(s) have spread to many churches and has permeated pulpits. People thus do not know any better and will not have their antinomianism challenged. Many many people are going to be in for a rude awakening who think they've punched their ticket to heaven and have no transformation in their lives.
 

Marano

Senior Member
Dec 7, 2011
398
32
28
29
#34
You're exactly correct, teh DoG are the true doctrines of the Gospel. John MacArthur crystallized this in his book 'The Gospel According to Jesus". Since the church wasn't accustomed to hearing the truth some vehemenently attacked JM and called the gospel "Lordship Salvation' a term he didn't coin. Also around the same time Chuck Swindoll came out with 'The Grace Aswakening" which crystallizes FGT and antinomianism, the polar opposite of the transforming Gospel. Of course the latter is a DTS alumnus so that is the false teaching being taught at DTS. It started with Lewis Sperry Chafer. On a more personal note I know of a professor at Dallas Baptist University who teaches that salvation is a personal achievement that we should boast in. His proof text is Jeremiah 9:24.

Anyhow, this/these error(s) have spread to many churches and has permeated pulpits. People thus do not know any better and will not have their antinomianism challenged. Many many people are going to be in for a rude awakening who think they've punched their ticket to heaven and have no transformation in their lives.
All the more reason to preach the gospel to these people even in church.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,188
113
#36
I reject all the 5 pillars of calvinism.. I believe calvinism is false..
Its really just a way to describe Salvation. Its perfectly biblical. When you try to make calvinism false you are really arguing against the bible. Not many who are against calvinism know that.

Calvinism is against mens working for and toward Salvation. Its showing that Salvation is the Work of God, from beginning to end.

I suppose most who think salvation can be lost must reject calvinism as well. Not surprising.
 
Feb 1, 2014
733
33
0
#38
Well I'm curious how many people come to see the truth in discussions like these.
I can't remember if I told you, but I accepted "Calvinism" before I even knew who John Calvin was. In fact, I've never read much more than quotes from him.

I told my Arminian pastor what I was seeing in Scripture after reading the book of Romans about 10 times. He told me what I was talking about was Calvinism then started telling me about Calvin burning Servetus (not totally true..the Geneva Council executed him and Calvin wanted to behead him) :)

I left the church not too long after that. He wanted me to be part of the evangelizing team, and I started meeting with them, but I didn't feel comfortable bringing people to a church that taught against eternal security. I figured, why should I stay somewhere that taught something I thought was harmful to new believers? So, I left.
 
Feb 1, 2014
733
33
0
#39
You're exactly correct, teh DoG are the true doctrines of the Gospel. John MacArthur crystallized this in his book 'The Gospel According to Jesus". Since the church wasn't accustomed to hearing the truth some vehemenently attacked JM and called the gospel "Lordship Salvation' a term he didn't coin. Also around the same time Chuck Swindoll came out with 'The Grace Aswakening" which crystallizes FGT and antinomianism, the polar opposite of the transforming Gospel. Of course the latter is a DTS alumnus so that is the false teaching being taught at DTS. It started with Lewis Sperry Chafer. On a more personal note I know of a professor at Dallas Baptist University who teaches that salvation is a personal achievement that we should boast in. His proof text is Jeremiah 9:24.

Anyhow, this/these error(s) have spread to many churches and has permeated pulpits. People thus do not know any better and will not have their antinomianism challenged. Many many people are going to be in for a rude awakening who think they've punched their ticket to heaven and have no transformation in their lives.
Wasn't Zane Hodge the main anti-Lordship guy? I remember hearing that Hodge and MacArthur did some verbal sparring.

I really DO NOT understand the argument that anti-Lordship Salvation people have. Salvation produces fruit of obedience and good works. The fruit doesn't cause salvation, but it is a result of salvation. If there's no fruit, over the long haul, it's likely there's no salvation and it's a false faith, although believers can experience a long period of fruitlessness. Simple enough to me.

One individual on the site doesn't like either Piper or MacArthur because of Lordship Salvation. I don't particularly care for either one of them personality-wise; I like either RC Sproul or David Platt more. But, I wouldn't question their teachings except on some minor issues..I'm not a big fan of MacArthur's view on mental health drugs or his view on Genesis 6. I have heard Piper say a few things that seemed like he didn't believe in eternal security, but maybe he just didn't word his responses to people clearly on those few occasions.
 
Feb 1, 2014
733
33
0
#40
Well I'm curious how many people come to see the truth in discussions like these.
There was one guy in the chat site who changed his mind, from Arminian theology to Reformed theology. So, I guess he's one person who did change his position after some of the Reformed chatters influenced him.

He was previously a charismatic type of person. I remember him telling about being a catcher for some healing services, and a obese woman fell backwards and cut his skin with one of her rings.