I think he's basing this on the assumption that Word of Faith theology came from E. W. Kenyon (a flawed assumption), and that Kenyon's teaching on Sense Knowledge and Revelation Knowledge somehow states that sense knowledge isn't real. But Kenyon didn't say that. He said that sense knowledge (sight, hearing, taste, touch, smell) has produced a lot of great benefits to man through science, but it has its limitations, and when scientists who go by sense knowledge alone reach the limitations of sense knowledge, they begin to speculate. This is where (according to Kenyon) the theory of evolution comes from. Revelation knowledge (the Bible, not the secret knowledge of the Gnostic teachers) tells us where man came from and why he is here, something we can't learn from sense knowledge. Word of Faith critics try to pin the label of Gnosticism on WoF teachers, but all you have to do is read through the Wikipedia article on Gnosticism and then read a few of Kenneth Hagin's (or even Kenyon's for that matter) books on faith and confession to see that there's zero linking them. Believing, confessing, and acting on God's Word to appropriate His provision has nothing to do with attaining the secret knowledge of Gnosticism to escape the evil physical universe created by an evil lesser god known as a demiurge in order to enter the good universe of pure spirit where the original god lives. This is a pure fantasy created by Word of Faith opponents to scare the uninitiated into believing that the WoF is evil.
