Circumcision today - biblical or barbaric?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Circumcision today - biblical or barbaric?


  • Total voters
    4
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
#81
But why? Did she believe it had been changed from what God commanded?
I have no idea. The level of her rage made me uncomfortable to the point I didn't want to explore the topic with her. It had nothing to do with GOD, though.
 
C

Cleanedinside

Guest
#82
I was just checking out a hi-def photo of the statue of David by Michelangelo. His wiener appears to be uncircumcised or partially circumcised. I know that doesn't mean anything regarding what Israel practiced, but I do know that there used to be something called partial circumcsion that was done years ago. Don't know what that entailed.
I'm not really sure. Because wasn't circumcision supposed to be a sign of the covenant? And a sign that looks as if there is no sign isn't such a good sign... I have wondered in the past if Michelangelo's David may have been because Michelangelo knew about the previous biblical circumcision thing, but have come to the conclusion that the David statue is simply uncircumcised.
 
C

Cleanedinside

Guest
#85
I should have explained that I was looking for a picture of what partial circumcision looks like, and that was an image that popped up. Thought it was funny.
I know some said I was too hard on Crossnote before, but the picture grossed me out more than a little, and I'm a guy. Remember ladies view these boards also.

I know I'm only new, but I guess I'm saying be careful what you post.
 
C

Cleanedinside

Guest
#86
I found an interesting site that says the Hebrew words for circumcision were muwl and namal, which are words for clipped (like one clips his/her fingernails), but not totally removed/destroyed.

What the Bible Really Says About Routine Infant Circumcision

If this site is right, I think today's circumcision is certainly not the same as that in the bible, but I don't know Hebrew, so I guess its easier to be fooled with respect to Hebrew words and their meanings.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
#87
I know some said I was too hard on Crossnote before, but the picture grossed me out more than a little, and I'm a guy. Remember ladies view these boards also.

I know I'm only new, but I guess I'm saying be careful what you post.
Uh I guess you're right. Seemed harmless enough, but my apologies.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
#88
I found an interesting site that says the Hebrew words for circumcision were muwl and namal, which are words for clipped (like one clips his/her fingernails), but not totally removed/destroyed.

What the Bible Really Says About Routine Infant Circumcision

If this site is right, I think today's circumcision is certainly not the same as that in the bible, but I don't know Hebrew, so I guess its easier to be fooled with respect to Hebrew words and their meanings.
I have to disagree with the statement, "Christians are forbidden from practicing routine infant circumcision by the New Testament". That's simply not true. Paul forbade Christians from doing so as a means of trying to be justified before GOD via the law.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
#89
I found an interesting site that says the Hebrew words for circumcision were muwl and namal, which are words for clipped (like one clips his/her fingernails), but not totally removed/destroyed.

What the Bible Really Says About Routine Infant Circumcision

If this site is right, I think today's circumcision is certainly not the same as that in the bible, but I don't know Hebrew, so I guess its easier to be fooled with respect to Hebrew words and their meanings.
That article you linked to is so badly argued I had to stop reading.
 
C

Cleanedinside

Guest
#90
I have to disagree with the statement, "Christians are forbidden from practicing routine infant circumcision by the New Testament". That's simply not true. Paul forbade Christians from doing so as a means of trying to be justified before GOD via the law.
It doesn't explain the first Christians with Jewish customs, does it?
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,397
113
#91
Neither, unless you are a practicing Jew.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,397
113
#92
It doesn't explain the first Christians with Jewish customs, does it?
If Christians are forbidden, then why did Paul have Timothy circumcised, in order to satisfy the Jews?

It's not a requirement for Christians, neither is it forbidden.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,021
223
63
#93
Wanted to bring topic back up to share something.

My wife gave birth to our 3rd son (5th child) 2 weeks ago, praise God. We had him circumcised on the 8th day (Lev. 12:3) in our home by a Jewish Rabbi, or Moel. We had our 2nd son circumcised when he was 8 days old by a pediatrician and the procedure took around 15 minutes and was terrible and painful to watch. (I'm still glad we circumcised him, I just wish it had happened differently.)

The Moel did the whole thing in 1 minute, (1 minute!) with as minimal pain as a circumcision can have. As soon as the Rabbi picked my son up he stopped crying and has only cried when we changed his bandage.

Spiritual lesson? As important as physical circumcision is, circumcision of the heart is far more important. When our hearts have to be circumcised by events and situations from the "world," (i.e. pediatrician) it can be long and painful, albeit still effective.

When we willingly allow God to be the one to circumcise our hearts (The Moel is a picture of that,) it can be done so much more quickly, easily and effectively (albeit still painful.)

Obviously, there are MANY spiritual differences and disagreements we have with the Moel, but the whole procedure was so much more peaceful and meaningful than with my other boys.
 
T

thepsalmist

Guest
#94
Neither of my two sons is circumcised. They were born before I was reborn (lol). The doctors wanted me to sign a paper to do so, but I refused. They said the procedure assisted with hygiene and avoided infection.... but do we cut off our children's ears because they are hard to wash and could get infected? No, it wasn't logical. Besides, my heart broke when they cried from washing their hair, how could I put them through THAT?! I'm glad I abstained from it because now as a Christian, having read the bible, I know that God does not require it of the gentiles - Paul made that clear in one of his letters.
 
J

Joshua_6

Guest
#95
Neither of my two sons is circumcised. They were born before I was reborn (lol). The doctors wanted me to sign a paper to do so, but I refused. They said the procedure assisted with hygiene and avoided infection.... but do we cut off our children's ears because they are hard to wash and could get infected? No, it wasn't logical. Besides, my heart broke when they cried from washing their hair, how could I put them through THAT?! I'm glad I abstained from it because now as a Christian, having read the bible, I know that God does not require it of the gentiles - Paul made that clear in one of his letters.
If ears had ugly, wrinkled foreskin that impeded function, harboured disease and grossed out the opposite gender, I'm sure we would practice circumcising the foreskin off our ears also.

I knew an online Christian lady with 4 sons, who didn't intend to circumcise them, against the advice of her obstetrician. Several years later, the older boy got some sort of disease (due to the uncircumcision), and she had to get them all done. She later admitted to the doctor who had previously advised her to circumcise, that her advice had been right all along, and she could have saved her sons considerable pain had she followed her advice when they were infants.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,426
3,478
113
#96
It is Biblical for Torah compliant Jews..

It is not needed for Christians.

It is a good long term health option for Males.
 
J

Joshua_6

Guest
#97
Neither of my two sons is circumcised. They were born before I was reborn (lol). The doctors wanted me to sign a paper to do so, but I refused. They said the procedure assisted with hygiene and avoided infection.... but do we cut off our children's ears because they are hard to wash and could get infected? No, it wasn't logical. Besides, my heart broke when they cried from washing their hair, how could I put them through THAT?! I'm glad I abstained from it because now as a Christian, having read the bible, I know that God does not require it of the gentiles - Paul made that clear in one of his letters.
I hope my previous reply didn't sound judgemental. I certainly don't think it matters for salvation, and don't mean to offend. I was really just giving my opinion, but I think God gives us parents because they act out of love, and know what is best for us.
 
J

Joshua_6

Guest
#98
Wanted to bring topic back up to share something.

My wife gave birth to our 3rd son (5th child) 2 weeks ago, praise God. We had him circumcised on the 8th day (Lev. 12:3) in our home by a Jewish Rabbi, or Moel.
I have only heard of a mole that is an animal, not a moel who is a Jewish Rabbi.

Isn't there a danger by having circumcision done by a Jewish Rabbi that your son will grow up and marry a Jew, or even become one? At least if done for medical reasons (not by a moel) or on a different day, there wouldn't be the danger of appearing to try to keep the law (and risk being enslaved by it).