Dear reader,
I find it an interesting idea I am sounding ridiculous.
I started with a biblical discussion, about two passages and suggesting certain
theological groups cannot cope with the consequences.
I was then accused of saying something so bad I should be stopped from saying it.
Which is God judges His people.
Israel, His people, caught in rebellion, cut down by the Levites.
Then he said to them, “This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor.’”
Exodus 32:27
This is what holiness means. In Christ we have entered in to the most Holy place,
and there we need to walk in purity and holiness.
This is the God who we worship. He has not changed. Sin is still the issue, and everyone
and anyone can sin and will face the consequences.
His people who abandon His ways, will face judgement.
But suppose the servant says to himself, ‘My master is taking a long time in coming,’ and he then begins to beat the other servants, both men and women, and to eat and drink and get drunk. The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers.
Luke 12:45-46
What I find odd is how to help those who struggle with God and holiness, one would
dilute judgement and consequences because of an overactive judgementalism and self
condemnation.
God is who He is, and His words are very obvious. Which is worse to sin without
restraint or to condemn yourself for things Jesus does not condemn you?
To condemn yourself for things Jesus does not condemn you, because though you
have arrived you say Jesus does not love you and wants to work with you to bring
real love and freedom to your life.
And then to be condemned by these very same people, is interesting fruit of things
gone into delusion and blaming others for ones own distortions.
I find it an interesting idea I am sounding ridiculous.
I started with a biblical discussion, about two passages and suggesting certain
theological groups cannot cope with the consequences.
I was then accused of saying something so bad I should be stopped from saying it.
Which is God judges His people.
Israel, His people, caught in rebellion, cut down by the Levites.
Then he said to them, “This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor.’”
Exodus 32:27
This is what holiness means. In Christ we have entered in to the most Holy place,
and there we need to walk in purity and holiness.
This is the God who we worship. He has not changed. Sin is still the issue, and everyone
and anyone can sin and will face the consequences.
His people who abandon His ways, will face judgement.
But suppose the servant says to himself, ‘My master is taking a long time in coming,’ and he then begins to beat the other servants, both men and women, and to eat and drink and get drunk. The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers.
Luke 12:45-46
What I find odd is how to help those who struggle with God and holiness, one would
dilute judgement and consequences because of an overactive judgementalism and self
condemnation.
God is who He is, and His words are very obvious. Which is worse to sin without
restraint or to condemn yourself for things Jesus does not condemn you?
To condemn yourself for things Jesus does not condemn you, because though you
have arrived you say Jesus does not love you and wants to work with you to bring
real love and freedom to your life.
And then to be condemned by these very same people, is interesting fruit of things
gone into delusion and blaming others for ones own distortions.