Eternal Security and free choice for the Christian?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

How do eternal security and free will relate together for the Christian

  • I believe that the Christian no longer has free choice in the area of salvation

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I believe that when a person becomes a Christian his free choice (will) unites with God's will, thus

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#61
No, it always has been and always will be faith alone, the difference IMO is that faith must be maintained if it is a believer outside the "Age of Grace".

Faith would never fail Why would it? When God never lets you down?


Faith of a mustard seed moves mountains, That same faith saves people forever.
 
S

Scriptureplz

Guest
#62
No, Otherwise, God is a liar, and did not keep his promise.



to me that is dualism, that is placing conditions on one person (pre-cross/tribulation) to be saved, and no conditions on others (people of the church age) who are saved by grace through faith alone..

God keeps his promise. David understood eternal life.. He understood faiht, He understood sacrifice and burnt offering God did not desire.. He understood he was saved.

The seal is not for our benefit, it is for Gods.. When Jesus died, he died for everyone, Old testament, New testament, tribulation, Kingdom age..

all men everywhere were saved by faith in Christ (abraham believed God and it was credited to him for righteousness) this same righteousness is given to us..
So if a believer takes the "mark of the beast" they are still saved?
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#63
It could be you're correct in that. I have wondered about the "faith of Christ" thing but never quite looked at it the same way as you are here. I think the reason I've always brushed that off is because it usually came from people trying to tell me the Church started with Paul or somewhere besides Acts 2. I have also heard Calvinist use it to support Faith being a gift and therefore God elects some to be saved and some not. Not saying you believe or teach these things, I have no idea. It's just why I have never paid that much attention to people that were pointing it out before.
Ha, I'm on the opposite spectrum than Calvin. I believe in dispensations and that the church started immediately after the resurrection of Christ, the death of the testator.
 
S

Scriptureplz

Guest
#64
Ha, I'm on the opposite spectrum than Calvin. I believe in dispensations and that the church started immediately after the resurrection of Christ, the death of the testator.
I believe the same. I believe any believer was indwelt with the Holy Spirit when Jesus was resurrected.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#65

Sacrifice and burnt offering never saved anyone.


Hebrews 10:4

For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

No one was ever saved by the law (Galatians 3)


[SUP]10 [/SUP]For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

[SUP]11 [/SUP]But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
Exactly, that's why they didn't experience salvation as we do. If so, they would have been absent from the body and present with the Lord upon death. Following the law could forgive their sins temporarily, keeping them from hell fire.

Leviticus 19:21-22, "21 And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, even a ram for a trespass offering. 22 And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he hath done: and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him."

His sins were forgiven but not cleared. They still had to be dealt with through the blood of Christ. The blood of the sacrifices could forgive sins but not take them away. The OT saints were just doing what they were instructed to do by God.

Exodus 34:7, "Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation."


 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#66
So if a believer takes the "mark of the beast" they are still saved?
why would a believer take the mark of the beast? A person who has true faith in God? Is God not powerful enough to help them resist? As he did Peter who was crucified, and all the nartyrs of the NT? (And Old for that matter)
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#67
why would a believer take the mark of the beast? A person who has true faith in God? Is God not powerful enough to help them resist? As he did Peter who was crucified, and all the nartyrs of the NT? (And Old for that matter)
Maybe to save himself or his family when faced with a hunter's knife to be beheaded. Man's free will is still at play. They must endure to the end to be saved into the earthly kingdom of Christ.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#68
Exactly, that's why they didn't experience salvation as we do. If so, they would have been absent from the body and present with the Lord upon death. Following the law could forgive their sins temporarily, keeping them from hell fire.

Um, no, Jesus had to pay the penalty first, When jesus paid it, They all were present with the lord imediately.


Leviticus 19:21-22, "21 And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, even a ram for a trespass offering. 22 And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he hath done: and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him."

His sins were forgiven but not cleared. They still had to be dealt with through the blood of Christ. The blood of the sacrifices could forgive sins but not take them away. The OT saints were just doing what they were instructed to do by God.

Exodus 34:7, "Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation."


[SUP]19 [/SUP]Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.

[SUP]20 [/SUP]Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
[SUP]21 [/SUP]Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

[SUP]22 [/SUP]But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

[SUP]23 [/SUP]But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.



[SUP]4 [/SUP]For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.


[SUP]11 [/SUP]And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:
[SUP]12 [/SUP]But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;



if sacrifice could take away sin, Every jew was given a clean slate on the day of redemption. And would be saved, whether they believed God or not..
because the high priest made the sacrifice for ALL ISREAL.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#69
Maybe to save himself or his family when faced with a hunter's knife to be beheaded. Man's free will is still at play. They must endure to the end to be saved into the earthly kingdom of Christ.

1. Endure to the end speaks of physical life, Not eternal life. Many martyres will not endure to the end, yet they are still saved, They are seen in heaven praying for God to redeem their deaths, and take vengence on those to killed them.

2. Again, Will a person who has true saving faith not become a martyr?


if they take the mark, Did they ever have faiht in God at all??
 
S

Scriptureplz

Guest
#70
1. Endure to the end speaks of physical life, Not eternal life. Many martyres will not endure to the end, yet they are still saved, They are seen in heaven praying for God to redeem their deaths, and take vengence on those to killed them.

2. Again, Will a person who has true saving faith not become a martyr?


if they take the mark, Did they ever have faiht in God at all??
Sounds like you are letting your doctrine determine truth. Do you think a believer that is a "babe in Christ" could deny Christ if their life was on the line? Especially after witnessing people literally losing their heads?
 
J

JustWhoIAm

Guest
#71
1. Endure to the end speaks of physical life, Not eternal life. Many martyres will not endure to the end, yet they are still saved, They are seen in heaven praying for God to redeem their deaths, and take vengence on those to killed them.

2. Again, Will a person who has true saving faith not become a martyr?


if they take the mark, Did they ever have faiht in God at all??
The mark is not physical. It is giving in to the deceit of the world and its sins.

The end is the fall of the current one world political structure.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#72
Sounds like you are letting your doctrine determine truth. Do you think a believer that is a "babe in Christ" could deny Christ if their life was on the line? Especially after witnessing people literally losing their heads?

And you think God is going to punish them for that, by not allowing them into heaven for 1? Peter denied Christ in front of men, God
never denied Peter

Again, Your preaching dualism, Your placing a condition on a persons salvation, Making them gain or lose it by their works..


I can not agree with this gospel. Jesus said he was the first the last, He is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. What goes today, went 5000 years ago and will go 5000 years from now.. No matter what age we are in.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#74
1. Endure to the end speaks of physical life, Not eternal life. Many martyres will not endure to the end, yet they are still saved, They are seen in heaven praying for God to redeem their deaths, and take vengence on those to killed them.

2. Again, Will a person who has true saving faith not become a martyr?


if they take the mark, Did they ever have faiht in God at all??
Again, I'm in agreement. The tribulation period is not necessarily about eternal salvation, but physical salvation into Christ's earthly kingdom. Those that were beheaded for the sake of Christ, would be resurrected to reign with Him.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#75

And you think God is going to punish them for that, by not allowing them into heaven for 1? Peter denied Christ in front of men, God
never denied Peter

Again, Your preaching dualism, Your placing a condition on a persons salvation, Making them gain or lose it by their works..


I can not agree with this gospel. Jesus said he was the first the last, He is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. What goes today, went 5000 years ago and will go 5000 years from now.. No matter what age we are in.
This is exactly why I believe the book of James, dispensationally, is not to the body of Christ but to the twelve tribes scattered abroad during the tribulation period. All signs in James point to this period when the coming of the Lord is literally at hand with the judge standing before the door. James points to Job as an example. Why? The 42 chapters of Job picture the 42 months(3 1/2 years) of the great tribulation. If you're a Jew living in this time period, look to the patience and suffering of Job as an example.
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,022
223
63
#76
Does it really matter if we have "free will" or not?
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#77
I can not agree with this gospel. Jesus said he was the first the last, He is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. What goes today, went 5000 years ago and will go 5000 years from now.. No matter what age we are in.
Who God is does not change, His character, but how He has dealt with man has changed from one dispensation to another.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#79
Who God is does not change, His character, but how He has dealt with man has changed from one dispensation to another.

Yes, But how he saved people has been the same from the beginning.

The gospel never changed, Faith in God saves. not of works at any time, lest a man should take credit.


Abraham and david are both examples.

God called abraham righteous before he did those grave sins and did all those great works. King david was called a man after Gods heart before he did any great work and before he committed those two horrific sins..

God knew both men would do the things they did long before he declared them his children.. He saved them in spite of their sin, based on their trust in God, and what his son would do far in the future (the cross)
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,687
3,545
113
#80

Yes, But how he saved people has been the same from the beginning.

The gospel never changed, Faith in God saves. not of works at any time, lest a man should take credit.


Abraham and david are both examples.

God called abraham righteous before he did those grave sins and did all those great works. King david was called a man after Gods heart before he did any great work and before he committed those two horrific sins..

God knew both men would do the things they did long before he declared them his children.. He saved them in spite of their sin, based on their trust in God, and what his son would do far in the future (the cross)
The shed blood of Jesus Christ is the only way to eternal salvation. But, how the blood of Christ is applied has changed. In the Church Age the blood is applied immediately upon believing the gospel of the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. In OT times, the blood of Christ was applied to those that were in Abraham's bosom for their obedience to God's word whatever that would have been in their dispensation. The blood of Christ was applied obviously after His death.