Inconsistencies of Unbelieving Jews

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Apr 24, 2013
38
0
0
#21
Josephus was a Jew. He is usually cited as the first
historian to mention Jesus. However his account has
been determined to be a forgery. He was also born
after the time of Jesus.

Anyway, why would Josephus remain a Jew if he
thought Jesus was the Messiah?
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#23
Josephus was a Jew. He is usually cited as the first
historian to mention Jesus. However his account has
been determined to be a forgery. He was also born
after the time of Jesus.

Anyway, why would Josephus remain a Jew if he
thought Jesus was the Messiah?
Josephus only reports that Jesus had a number of followers. There is no reason to believe that Josephus personally believed Jesus was the Messiah. And you are right, many believe the statements about Jesus were added by later Christians.
 
Apr 9, 2013
239
6
0
#24
So there's a pretty big Jews for Judaism anti-missionary movement out there, and it's the counterpart to Jews for Jesus. But some of their arguments just make me scratch my head. For instance...

1. Why are they opposed to Jesus being called a Son of God when this title was used many times in different applications in the Old Testament?It wasn't so much the claim of being the Son of YAH, but because of what Yeshua represented, they couldn't accept it, therefore they used that as a crutch for hating Him.

2. Why are they opposed to God coming in human form?They don't believe that is possible. Firstly, God created Man in his image (Genesis 1:27) and, secondly, one of the men who ate with Abraham was called Yahweh/Yehovah in the Hebrew (Genesis 18:22).The two men were angels, along with YHVH(GOD) and Abraham.

3. Why do they claim that Isaiah 53's Suffering Servant is Israel when Isaiah 53:8 says that he was stricken for God's people? Is Israel being stricken for the sake of Israel?Tanak (OT) teaches of Yeshua coming in two ways. 1) The suffering servant(Ben Joseph) and 2) Ben David (The King) They refused and still refuse that Yeshua who claimed to be Messiah could possibly be who they waited for. Because He spoke against their mishnah/talmudic teachings that they claimed to be of YAH which was a lie. This is why they reject Isaiah 53 as being of Yeshua. It is taught in the synagogues throughout Israel that people are to disregard that chapter all together.

4. Why do they say the prophecies in the Psalms are taken out of context and should be understood in terms of the psalmist's life when, firstly, psalms were known to sometimes be prophetic and, secondly, some of them describe events that never took place in David's life?
Again, too many point to Yeshua, especially as the suffering servant.

Just my bit of knowledge to these. blessings
 
Apr 9, 2013
239
6
0
#25
I think maybe you overlooked my point. I was listing arguments that they used to try to disprove Christianity. And some of those arguments are hypocritical. That's what makes me stop and wonder what they're thinking. Take another look at them. For example, their rejection that God had corporeal manifestations such as can be seen in both the Old Testament and the New.
Even though orthodox use parts of Torah and the Tanak, they use it as a back of book. They put the majority of their stock in the mishnah,(so called oral law) because there are over 100 direct prophecies of Yeshua in the OT. You could witness to someone with the OT and bring them to salvation before you even reach Matthew. they know it.
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,783
2,947
113
#26
I always thought Jews were people who believed in the Old Testament, and honored God. I figured that no one had presented Christ as Messiah, and when they did, they would soon want to follow him.

The biggest surprise of my life was going to an Orthodox Synagogue this year, and sitting for 2 1/2 hours. I heard only one reference to the "Redeemer". But what I heard plenty of was the Talmud. There would be a Bible reading surrounded by the Talmudic interpretation which generally went from the ridiculous to the sublime.

To cite only one thing, did you know that the Talmud says Aaron did not construct the golden calf to be worshipped, only to be a reminder of Moses when he was gone? Because Aaron was the high priest, and he needed to be perfect, so therefore he would never actually worshipped the calf. The only people who worshipped the calf were 3000 Egyptian rabble rousers who had followed the children of Israel into the desert, and it was them God destroyed.

And so it went on and on through the readings. The Talmud is their Bible, and it is commentaries made by men about things written by God, and those commentaries are just wrong in so many cases.

I think Jews are indeed a totally different religion than Christians. We may owe them the Old Testament, and the prophecies about Jesus, the entire story of creation and the fall, but they are not just people who need to find a Messiah.

My understanding is most of the newer sects of Jews are NOT looking for a Messiah at all. So very hard to convert them to something they are not looking for. I think with evangelism of Jews, we need a whole new perspective on what they believe and why. And then present Jesus as the answer they were not looking for!
 
Apr 9, 2013
239
6
0
#27
I always thought Jews were people who believed in the Old Testament, and honored God. I figured that no one had presented Christ as Messiah, and when they did, they would soon want to follow him.

The biggest surprise of my life was going to an Orthodox Synagogue this year, and sitting for 2 1/2 hours. I heard only one reference to the "Redeemer". But what I heard plenty of was the Talmud. There would be a Bible reading surrounded by the Talmudic interpretation which generally went from the ridiculous to the sublime.

To cite only one thing, did you know that the Talmud says Aaron did not construct the golden calf to be worshipped, only to be a reminder of Moses when he was gone? Because Aaron was the high priest, and he needed to be perfect, so therefore he would never actually worshipped the calf. The only people who worshipped the calf were 3000 Egyptian rabble rousers who had followed the children of Israel into the desert, and it was them God destroyed.

And so it went on and on through the readings. The Talmud is their Bible, and it is commentaries made by men about things written by God, and those commentaries are just wrong in so many cases.

I think Jews are indeed a totally different religion than Christians. We may owe them the Old Testament, and the prophecies about Jesus, the entire story of creation and the fall, but they are not just people who need to find a Messiah.

My understanding is most of the newer sects of Jews are NOT looking for a Messiah at all. So very hard to convert them to something they are not looking for. I think with evangelism of Jews, we need a whole new perspective on what they believe and why. And then present Jesus as the answer they were not looking for!
As a believing jew. I just want to thank you for such a gentle, genuine writing of thought. No attack, no disrespect, but what seems to be a hernest thought of the need of Messiah for the jews that are so lost. And as Yeshua says in Matt. 23:37-39 basically "Until Jerusalem declares, "blessed is He who comes in the name of the LORD"
So we must pray for the peace and salvation of Jerusalem, for Yeshua will not be stepping down on the Mnt. of Olives until that happens. Blessings and thank you again for you gentle spirit.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,370
2,446
113
#28
I always thought Jews were people who believed in the Old Testament, and honored God. I figured that no one had presented Christ as Messiah, and when they did, they would soon want to follow him.

The biggest surprise of my life was going to an Orthodox Synagogue this year, and sitting for 2 1/2 hours. I heard only one reference to the "Redeemer". But what I heard plenty of was the Talmud. There would be a Bible reading surrounded by the Talmudic interpretation which generally went from the ridiculous to the sublime.

To cite only one thing, did you know that the Talmud says Aaron did not construct the golden calf to be worshipped, only to be a reminder of Moses when he was gone? Because Aaron was the high priest, and he needed to be perfect, so therefore he would never actually worshipped the calf. The only people who worshipped the calf were 3000 Egyptian rabble rousers who had followed the children of Israel into the desert, and it was them God destroyed.

And so it went on and on through the readings. The Talmud is their Bible, and it is commentaries made by men about things written by God, and those commentaries are just wrong in so many cases.

I think Jews are indeed a totally different religion than Christians. We may owe them the Old Testament, and the prophecies about Jesus, the entire story of creation and the fall, but they are not just people who need to find a Messiah.

My understanding is most of the newer sects of Jews are NOT looking for a Messiah at all. So very hard to convert them to something they are not looking for. I think with evangelism of Jews, we need a whole new perspective on what they believe and why. And then present Jesus as the answer they were not looking for!
Totally agree.
Any research I've done has come up with the exact same conclusions.

Christians think of Orthodox Jews as people who believe, and live by, the Old Testament.
That just isn't how it works.
But it wasn't how it worked in Jesus' day either... and he said so.

There are some Jews called Karaites, who believe strictly in the O.T., and not in the Talmud.
They may have a few odd beliefs or traditions here and there, but they seem, essentially,
to be faithful to the Old Testament.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#29
Amen and amen to all those who look at the Jews with love and understanding, who wish them well, without attacking or judging. And with prayer for them to understand their need for Christ as their Savior. It is a good thing to learn about what they believe, but with honesty and not exaggeration.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#30
I found the problem. I could not find it, because I was looking for it in the KJV. Whether my KJV is wrong, or they all are, Lev. 6:15 is translated incorrectly. I compared it to the Hebrew, and it doesn't come anywhere close. Here is the link provided by Wikipedia: Leviticus 6 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre this translation is correct. Since the offering must be forever, and since it must be an heir of Aaron, the high priesthood cannot fail from Israel. I think there may be other verses of this type also. I read this verse years ago as offered by Messianic Jews to prove that there must have been a high priest appointed by God before Jerusalem fell. Jesus is the only claimant to that title.
Hm. Doesn't that just say that it's required forever? That doesn't necessarily mean the Israelites will obey it forever, right? So I'm not sure how that proves an unbroken chain of high priests.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#31
Josephus was a Jew. He is usually cited as the first
historian to mention Jesus. However his account has
been determined to be a forgery. He was also born
after the time of Jesus.

Anyway, why would Josephus remain a Jew if he
thought Jesus was the Messiah?
Actually, there are two accounts of Josephus' concerning Jesus. I think the earlier one we found is called into question, because it hints at Jesus' supernatural qualities. The later account does not have this part in it. And so somewhat ironically this later account is believed to be Josephus' original account. But in the same Antiquities of the Jews Josephus makes reference to other Christian figures, one of which I think was Jesus' brother. So there's no reason to write off Josephus' account of Jesus.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#32
Hm. Doesn't that just say that it's required forever? That doesn't necessarily mean the Israelites will obey it forever, right? So I'm not sure how that proves an unbroken chain of high priests.
The logic is that God would not require something that cannot be performed. The forever is sort of "progressive"; you can't just skip a year, or a thousand years. Since God Himself wrote in Torah, "the high priest must do this ongoing forever", He would never have a time when there was not a high priest to do it. Once Jerusalem was destroyed, the Jews dispersed, and there were no high priests (except Jesus). Jews who do not believe in Jesus have no answer, or so I have been told.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#33
Amen and amen to all those who look at the Jews with love and understanding, who wish them well, without attacking or judging.
They are His cousins, nephews, etc., right? And the Jews, no matter how Talmudic they get, have an understanding of God's love for our daily life that I see very seldom among Christians.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#34
Christ said all their laws made them miss the point of the torah. I found them to all be based on the torah.
I think in some cases they can be based in the Torah. For instance, the law regarding not eating dairy and meat together. It doesn't say that in the Torah, but it's loosely based on it. Another tradition of some Jews is to not add a blue strip to the tassels that they wear, because they believe the formula for the blue coloring is lost and it just wouldn't be the same kind of blue.

So I think a lot of what is popularly known as Judaism is based on interpretation of the Torah. And those interpretations are recorded in their other books. Deuteronomy 4:2 Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you. Something tells me they missed this verse.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#35
The logic is that God would not require something that cannot be performed.
During the Babylonian Exile the Torah was still in effect, and there were plenty of Jews who could not perform those duties that were required of them by God. So I don't think that Messianic Jewish argument is a particularly strong one.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#36
During the Babylonian Exile the Torah was still in effect, and there were plenty of Jews who could not perform those duties that were required of them by God. So I don't think that Messianic Jewish argument is a particularly strong one.
You misunderstand. I am referring to the exile of the Jews from Jerusalem that began in 70AD, and continued until 1948. This is the period of exile in which Jesus is the high priest of anyone who will turn to Him.
 
Jan 10, 2013
318
4
0
#37
Including contradicting their own beliefs apparently. lol But as far as that's concerned I think Maxwel sums it up nicely.
Of course. Most modern Jews (not all) do not know the Jewish beliefs of 50BC - they've been added to.
Just as most modern Christians (not all) do not know the Christian beliefs of 50AD - they've been added to.

But one group are considered wicked for going astray and the other is followed as being true...
And pointing out what and where it went wrong is considered heresy in both camps. By expulsion from one camp and and murder in the other, of those that disagreed (for most of the intervening time).

Matthew 7:5 Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#38
So there's a pretty big Jews for Judaism anti-missionary movement out there, and it's the counterpart to Jews for Jesus. But some of their arguments just make me scratch my head. For instance...

1. Why are they opposed to Jesus being called a Son of God when this title was used many times in different applications in the Old Testament?

2. Why are they opposed to God coming in human form? Firstly, God created Man in his image (Genesis 1:27) and, secondly, one of the men who ate with Abraham was called Yahweh/Yehovah in the Hebrew (Genesis 18:22).

3. Why do they claim that Isaiah 53's Suffering Servant is Israel when Isaiah 53:8 says that he was stricken for God's people? Is Israel being stricken for the sake of Israel?

4. Why do they say the prophecies in the Psalms are taken out of context and should be understood in terms of the psalmist's life when, firstly, psalms were known to sometimes be prophetic and, secondly, some of them describe events that never took place in David's life?
Good OP
Good questions
Important topic
Kudos.


Sent from my brilliant android
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,707
3,650
113
#39
Totally agree.
Any research I've done has come up with the exact same conclusions.

Christians think of Orthodox Jews as people who believe, and live by, the Old Testament.
That just isn't how it works.
But it wasn't how it worked in Jesus' day either... and he said so.

There are some Jews called Karaites, who believe strictly in the O.T., and not in the Talmud.
They may have a few odd beliefs or traditions here and there, but they seem, essentially,
to be faithful to the Old Testament.
But if they were truly faithful to the Tanakh wouldn't they embrace Yeshua as their Messiah?

For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
(Joh 5:46)
 

PS

Senior Member
Jan 11, 2013
5,399
695
113
#40
I found the problem. I could not find it, because I was looking for it in the KJV. Whether my KJV is wrong, or they all are, Lev. 6:15 is translated incorrectly. I compared it to the Hebrew, and it doesn't come anywhere close. Here is the link provided by Wikipedia: Leviticus 6 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre this translation is correct. Since the offering must be forever, and since it must be an heir of Aaron, the high priesthood cannot fail from Israel. I think there may be other verses of this type also. I read this verse years ago as offered by Messianic Jews to prove that there must have been a high priest appointed by God before Jerusalem fell. Jesus is the only claimant to that title.
Lev 6:15 And the anointed priest that shall be in his stead from among his sons shall offer it, it is a due for ever; it shall be wholly made to smoke unto the LORD.

Then came the Great High Priest who was a priest for ever.

Psa 110:4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

Heb 7:27 Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.

once
— rather as Greek, “once for all.” The sufficiency of the one sacrifice to atone for all sins for ever, resulted from its absolute spotlessness.