Is Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) a total joke?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#61
I wish suuuuuumbody who believes in a local Genesis flood explain how Mt Ararat was covered 20 cubits above its peak and still kept that flood local!! Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?
The earth is 6.000 years old.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

Humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

There was a global flood 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

T.rex didn't eat meat until after the fall, around 6,000 years ago.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

And on and on.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#63
I wish suuuuuumbody who believes in a local Genesis flood explain how Mt Ararat was covered 20 cubits above its peak and still kept that flood local!! Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?
Too easy.

The bible does not indicate that Mt. Ararat was covered with water.

20 cubits is also an error on your part.
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,720
829
113
44
#64
Ok was the whole point of this to come here and throw insults? Maybe you sound just as stupid to some of us here. I have never seen anyone on here just set up such an obvious trap to insult everyone that doesn't think just as they do. Why don't you tone it down a little "brother", because in my opinion your insulting comments are the dumbest thing in this thread, by far.

Even if you have a problem with these lines of thought that should in no way affect the way you talk to your fellow Christians, and if I systematically took your lines of thought and just threw insults at them, how would you feel, and how does that glorify our Savior and God? These aren’t exactly salvation issues anyway, even though I think the flood is proof of, and reminds us of Gods righteous judgement.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#65
I wish somebody would stop simply attacking biblical belief and post some facts. I suppose that's way beyond the scope of his agenda, however. Can anyone spell T-R-O-L-L?
 
P

prodigal

Guest
#66
a high percentage of the early christian fathers believed (wrongly) that Jesus would return in 500 ad as that would make 6000 years from creation of human history, so if we are asking what early christians believed, the evidence is not hidden. so yes their interpretation of the information led to wrong conclusions but thats not to say the information they had to go from is incorrect. so why bother wondering or trying to prove what book they went from when we can know for certain their thoughts on the situation.

Chiliasm of Early Church Fathers — North Forest
 
Last edited:
Jun 30, 2011
2,521
35
0
#67
The earth is 6.000 years old.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

Humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

There was a global flood 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

T.rex didn't eat meat until after the fall, around 6,000 years ago.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

And on and on.

Do you know how your folly exclaims?

Doesn't sound stupid if you have a biblical worldview

Here is what is stupid

-Evolution is not observable, testable, or repeatable but still called Science

-If Naturalism was correct logic would not be possible and knowledge to begin with

DNA would not be possible if Naturalism was true because it is a Language

What would be evidences of a local flood?

--Billions of dead things buried by water located all around the world

--Large tracts of land buried by water across the world

-----I think we pretty much see that in the world

That there is more water located in the Earth then on the surface of the earth - Recently found a greater amount of water in deep rocks 700km below the surface of the earth


Whats stupid is your inability to do your homework hmmm
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
#68
Here's what is printed in a King James Bible pertaining to the LXX:

"The most remarkable translation of the Old Testament into Greek is called the Septuagint, which, if the opinion of some eminent writers is to be credited, was made in the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus, about 270 years before the Christian era. At any rate, it is undoubtedly the most ancient that is now extant. The five books of Moses were translated first in the time of Ptolemy Philadelphus, King of Egypt, and others were added until the whole Old Testament was finished, and the version dates about 270 years before the birth of Christ. The transcendent value of this version may be seen from the extensive usage that it had attained in Jewish synagogues, from the fact that our blessed Lord and the apostles habitually quoted from it, and also from the fact that it helped to determine the state of the Hebrew text at the time when the version was made. Besides, it establishes, beyond all doubt, the point that our Lord and his inspired apostles recognized the duty of rendering the Word into the vulgar tongue of all people so that all men might, in their own speech, hear the wonderful things of the Lord. All the authors of the New Testament appear to have written in the Greek language. That this tongue was already familiar to them as a vehicle to express God's inspired Word is evident from their frequent use of the Greek translation, the Septuagint, in quoting the Old Testament and from the remarkable accordance of their style with the style of that ancient and precious version."

So the LXX must be wrong because it does not jive with your 6,000 world?

The bible that Jesus and the apostles quoted from must be wrong because it does not jive with your 6,000 world?

And you claim over and over and again and again that you are a critical thinker?

LOL.

Use your God-given brain, man!
I thought you said that KJV was incorrect because LXX was correct.....you get that the LXX is correct from a KJV Bible?
How do we know Jesus quoted this LXX?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#69
I think that you have a fetish with Dr. Hovind and no matter how may times you will rail on him people will believe what they want to believe......so crack in the box how is it going....any new tacos or burgers you have to peddle?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#70
I wish somebody would stop simply attacking biblical belief and post some facts. I suppose that's way beyond the scope of his agenda, however. Can anyone spell T-R-O-L-L?
It seems ole crack in the box likes to peddle pseudo burgers and tacos with a complete lack of faith while hook, line and sinker swallowing pseudo science and the mere opinions of acid-guru-college professors who prove nothing by their circular reasoning, un-educated guesses, opinion, conjecture and every other word of like caliber and order!
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#71
It seems ole crack in the box likes to peddle pseudo burgers and tacos with a complete lack of faith while hook, line and sinker swallowing pseudo science and the mere opinions of acid-guru-college professors who prove nothing by their circular reasoning, un-educated guesses, opinion, conjecture and every other word of like caliber and order!
Someone rep DCon for me. Gotta spread some around before I hit him up again.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#72
I wish somebody would stop simply attacking biblical belief and post some facts. I suppose that's way beyond the scope of his agenda, however. Can anyone spell T-R-O-L-L?
The only "fact" I saw you post is that there is fossil evidence that humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

I called you on your BS and you crawled back under your 6,000-year-old rock.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#73
How do we know Jesus quoted this LXX?
Are you saying that Jesus and the apostles did not quote from LXX?

If so, how do you know that they did not quote from LXX?

Were you there? (favorite sentence of YECs).
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#75
It seems ole crack in the box likes to peddle pseudo burgers and tacos with a complete lack of faith while hook, line and sinker swallowing pseudo science and the mere opinions of acid-guru-college professors who prove nothing by their circular reasoning, un-educated guesses, opinion, conjecture and every other word of like caliber and order!
What you can do quite well is run your mouth.

What I have never seen you do is support any of your drivel with credible evidence.

Your evidence that humans coexisted with dinosaurs is what, again?

Go ahead, post that pic one more time.

LOL.
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
#77
Are you saying that Jesus and the apostles did not quote from LXX?

If so, how do you know that they did not quote from LXX?

Were you there? (favorite sentence of YECs).
I am asking how you know they quoted from it? Let me guess, you saw it in the KJV Bible, which you have stated is incorrect.
You can't have it both ways. According to you, the LXX says local flood, while the KJV says global flood and that the LXX is the best Bible......Do you see that this does not make any sense?
If the incorrect KJV shows Jesus quoted from the LXX, how do we know that that part is correct?....
With respect to your question No. 1, I do not believe that there is any bible known to man that is 100% true or 100% accurate. If you believe otherwise, what bible is that, exactly? The King James? The Septuagint (LXX)? Or what?

The bible is relevant to this topic because I see many comments to the effect that, "The world is 6,000 years old because the bible says so."
Yes, I do believe Christ died on the cross for our sins and was resurrected from the dead.

Now I have a question for you.

You have indicated you are somewhat of an expert on the Greek manuscripts.

Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) has videos that babble on about a global flood.

Doesn't the Septuagint (LXX) indicate that the flood was not global?

The Septuagint (LXX) is the bible, right? One Jesus and the apostles quoted from, right?
Here's what is printed in a King James Bible pertaining to the LXX:

"The most remarkable translation of the Old Testament into Greek is called the Septuagint, which, if the opinion of some eminent writers is to be credited, was made in the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus, about 270 years before the Christian era. At any rate, it is undoubtedly the most ancient that is now extant. The five books of Moses were translated first in the time of Ptolemy Philadelphus, King of Egypt, and others were added until the whole Old Testament was finished, and the version dates about 270 years before the birth of Christ. The transcendent value of this version may be seen from the extensive usage that it had attained in Jewish synagogues, from the fact that our blessed Lord and the apostles habitually quoted from it, and also from the fact that it helped to determine the state of the Hebrew text at the time when the version was made. Besides, it establishes, beyond all doubt, the point that our Lord and his inspired apostles recognized the duty of rendering the Word into the vulgar tongue of all people so that all men might, in their own speech, hear the wonderful things of the Lord. All the authors of the New Testament appear to have written in the Greek language. That this tongue was already familiar to them as a vehicle to express God's inspired Word is evident from their frequent use of the Greek translation, the Septuagint, in quoting the Old Testament and from the remarkable accordance of their style with the style of that ancient and precious version."

So the LXX must be wrong because it does not jive with your 6,000 world?

The bible that Jesus and the apostles quoted from must be wrong because it does not jive with your 6,000 world?

And you claim over and over and again and again that you are a critical thinker?

LOL.

Use your God-given brain, man!
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#78
Your cat looks like my cat.
That's not my cat. It's just a pic I found that I like. It suggests a kind of a laid-back attitude yet with a bit of deal-with-it wit missed in. But that's how I see the pic. Not saying I am very witty, but I like to pretend I am sometimes. ;)

How long do you think cats have been around?
Domestic cats, or their ancestors? I believe domestic cats have been around longer than 6,000 years. Evolution makes more sense to me. But I wish not to enter the debate with that. I respect YEC, what I don't like about it is the Crusader complex many people who adhere to it have. "If you don't agree, you don't trust of believe in God." That arrogant, imo - esp since Christianity is about Jesus, or so I thought.
 
Last edited:
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#79
What you can do quite well is run your mouth.

What I have never seen you do is support any of your drivel with credible evidence.

Your evidence that humans coexisted with dinosaurs is what, again?

Go ahead, post that pic one more time.

LOL.
Hey crack in the box...I see you have your dictionary out so you can use words like drivel :) HAHAHA.... Look JACK (no pun intended) the evidence you quote is nothing more than un-educated guesses by mere men void of the faith that is required to please God......and my statement stands......one day, you like Job and Job's friends, will be raked over the coals by God as he refutes your humanistic reasoning and humanistic (DRIVEL) that you spout and peddle.....If I remember right I posted a pic without any qualifying words to support and or reject that humans walked with dinosaurs.....and the last time I checked there is overwhelming evidence world wide of a deluge that wiped out man and beast....it also changed and destroyed the world that WAS.....so.....what you believe and or espouse bears little on what the word teaches and the possible...yea, plausible explanation of what transpired with man and the dinosaurs....so...keep flipping those tacos and burgers....maybe one day you will actually make the credible list of know nothings......!

P.S. and FYI...I was typing...Not running my mouth...surely you know the difference!
 
Last edited:
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#80
The only "fact" I saw you post ...
Well, at least you knew I was talking about you. Other than that ...

Ever hear of Jeff Dunham and Peanut?

[video=youtube;mE3ehB9jpts]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE3ehB9jpts[/video]

I asked for facts from you! You haven't posted any.