Is Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) a total joke?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

AbbeyJoy

Guest
#81
Who's dr dino?
 
Oct 12, 2013
233
3
0
#82
The earth is 6.000 years old.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

Humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

There was a global flood 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

T.rex didn't eat meat until after the fall, around 6,000 years ago.

Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?

And on and on.


You clearly believe in the Evolution Religion. Yep, that's right, evolution is a religion. It takes a heap of faith to believe that nothing exploded and *poof* here we are.

You call it the Big Bang. Here is the real account of the "Big Bang"...

Genesis 1:3 And God said, "Let there be..."


God bless!
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#83
I think that you have a fetish with Dr. Hovind and no matter how may times you will rail on him people will believe what they want to believe......so crack in the box how is it going....any new tacos or burgers you have to peddle?
When people on this site quit praising Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) to high heaven, I will quit bringing up the truth, like he is a convict.

Have you read Dr. Dino's Ph.D dissertation?

Whoever wrote that is not smarter than a 5th grader.
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,728
833
113
44
#84
..............
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
#85
When people on this site quit praising Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) to high heaven, I will quit bringing up the truth, like he is a convict.

Have you read Dr. Dino's Ph.D dissertation?

Whoever wrote that is not smarter than a 5th grader.
Can you please explain macro evolution to us through chemistry at a molecular level?
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#86
I thought you said that KJV was incorrect because LXX was correct.....you get that the LXX is correct from a KJV Bible?
The Septuagint (LXX), from the genealogies, indicates that Methuselah died 14 years after the Flood.

The King James, from the genealogies, indicates that Methuselah died the year of the Flood.

Did Jesus and the apostles quote from the King James?

In what language did Paul write the letters to the Corinthians?

What language was predominant in Corinth?

There are quotations from the Old Testament in the New Testament, right?

Can it be determined from the quotations themselves where they came from? A Greek manuscript as opposed to a Hebrew manuscript?
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#87
If the Bible can be proven to be true - and that's what this movement is about, it seems, is proving the Bible is literal history - then what does one need faith for? Isn't that teaching people to evaluate the spiritual based on what they can see?
What sets the Bible above all other religious books is that it is credible. Lots of evidence supporting its claims.

Faith has been defined as a leap in the dark. I don't agree with that. Faith is based on truth. Yes, faith is a reasonable matter.
Abraham had faith. He offered up Isaac. Genesis 21. Why? Because Abraham understood that God would keep His word that Isaac would be heir of the promise made to Abraham in Genesis 12. How or why did Abraham come to the conclusion God would raise up Isaac? See Hebrews 11:17-19. Because God kept His word with Abraham. Here's an example, "Get out thy country...go to land which I will show thee." Genesis 12.
God led Abraham to that land. Abraham had never been there. But God did what He said He would do.

Consider also, John 20:26-31.

And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.
Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:
But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.

Acts 1:3 To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.

Don't let the world's definition of faith be the definition of your faith. Otherwise, you could end up believing in the unbelievable!
 
Last edited:
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#88
Hmm ... two challenges go absolutely and completely ignored. How surprising ...

 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
#89
liars lie.

"Methuselah, who lived 969 years (Genesis 5:27), longer than anyone else recorded. His father was Enoch, of whom it is said he "walked with God" (5:24) but who was taken to heaven without dying at 365 years. Methuselah's son Lamech died a few years before the Flood at 777 years (5:31) after bearing Noah. When Methuselah was born, his godly father must have prophetically known of coming things for his son's name means "when he dies, judgment," and interestingly enough, Methuselah died in the same year God judged the sinful world with the great Flood of Noah's day. "
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#90
Can you please explain macro evolution to us through chemistry at a molecular level?
Kodiak! Look what I found!



Hope it helps.
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
#91
Kodiak! Look what I found!



Hope it helps.
lol, that doesn't explain it....the whole point of my question is evolution relies on macro evolution....yet no scientists can explain it at a molecular level and in relation to chemistry....Evolution could not happen using only micro evolution, yet no scientist can explain macro evolution.....Why should we believe something that is being pushed on us, yet cannot be explained?
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#92
lol, that doesn't explain it....the whole point of my question is evolution relies on macro evolution....yet no scientists can explain it at a molecular level and in relation to chemistry....Evolution could not happen using only micro evolution, yet no scientist can explain macro evolution.....Why should we believe something that is being pushed on us, yet cannot be explained?
AMEN! (Message too short to post. This changes that.)
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#93
liars lie.

"Methuselah, who lived 969 years (Genesis 5:27), longer than anyone else recorded. His father was Enoch, of whom it is said he "walked with God" (5:24) but who was taken to heaven without dying at 365 years. Methuselah's son Lamech died a few years before the Flood at 777 years (5:31) after bearing Noah. When Methuselah was born, his godly father must have prophetically known of coming things for his son's name means "when he dies, judgment," and interestingly enough, Methuselah died in the same year God judged the sinful world with the great Flood of Noah's day. "
I see you know how to copy and paste from the Institute for Creation Research website.

It would appear you are you calling the Septuagint (LXX) a lie.

The LXX that Jesus and the apostles quoted from.

Which indicates that Methuselah died 14 years after the Flood.
 
Jan 6, 2014
77
3
0
#94
Evolution is a myth that has been debunked too many times, and yes you'll commonly hear their supporters using the Majority Mentality by saying most scientist believe in it therefore it is true......
 

kodiak

Senior Member
Mar 8, 2015
4,995
290
83
#95
I see you know how to copy and paste from the Institute for Creation Research website.

It would appear you are you calling the Septuagint (LXX) a lie.

The LXX that Jesus and the apostles quoted from.

Which indicates that Methuselah died 14 years after the Flood.
They never quoted from the LXX....I have done my research....I also bet you didn't know that the Letter of Aristeas is not real either... It has all been proven to be a hoax. multiple articles on it too....
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#96
You are beating a dead horse.

What you don't seem to be able to comprehend is that the dead horse is not 6,000 years old. The dead horse is millions of years old.

There is no scientific evidence from any credible source that indicates there are fossils that prove dinosaurs coexisted with humans.

Here is what one of my sources says, Glen Kuban:

For many years claims were made by strict, "young-earth" creationists that human footprints or "giant man tracks" occur alongside fossilized dinosaur tracks in the limestone beds of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose Texas. If true, such a finding would dramatically contradict the conventional geologic timetable, which holds that humans did not appear on earth until over 60 million years after the dinosaurs became extinct. However, the "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been abandoned even by most creationists.

The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and carvings. The largest number of "man tracks" are forms of elongate, metatarsal dinosaur tracks, made by bipedal dinosaurs that sometimes impressed their metatarsi (heels and soles) as they walked. When the digit impressions of such tracks are subdued by mud-backflow or secondary infilling, a somewhat human shape often results. Other alleged "man tracks" including purely erosional features (often selectively highlighted to encourage human shapes), indistinct marks of undertain origin, and a smaller number of doctored and carved tracks (most of the latter occurring on loose blocks of rock)
.

A few individuals such as Carl Baugh, Don Patton, and Ian Juby, continue to promote the Paluxy "man tracks" or alleged human tracks in Mesozoic or Paleozoic from other localities, but such claims are not considered credible by either mainstream scientists or major creationist groups. When examined thoroughly and carefully, the Paluxy tracks not only provide no positive evidence for young-earth creationism, but are found to be among many other lines of geologic evidence which indicate that the earth has had a long and complex history.

Paluxy Dinosaur/"Man Track" controversy


Do you dispute any of this information?

If so, please provide a link to your source.

You are quite fond of making statements of absolutes without offering any proof whatsoever of the veracity of your claims.


Hey Viligant_Warrior:

It doesn't appear to me that I am absolutely and completely ignoring your challenges to me like you stated in your post #88. The above quote is from my post #47 to you in response to your claim that there are footprint fossils that prove humans and dinosaurs coexisted.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#97
They never quoted from the LXX....I have done my research....
Okay, give me the links that you think prove that Jesus and the apostles never quoted from the Septuagint (LXX).

Or better yet, explain that proof in your own words.
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#98
Evolution is a myth that has been debunked too many times, and yes you'll commonly hear their supporters using the Majority Mentality by saying most scientist believe in it therefore it is true......
Don't we use the majority mentality in accepting our Bible? The Council of Nicaea?

The many outweigh the few is fiercely used when arguing agaisnt unorthodox texts.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
#99
Hmm ... two challenges go absolutely and completely ignored. How surprising ...

I just gave you evidence I responded to your challenge pertaining to fossil footprints proving humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

What is the other one you are whining about?
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
They never quoted from the LXX....I have done my research....
Dr. Barnett does a very good job of explaining it:

"The Septuagint [LXX] was the first translation of the Hebrew Bible and was made in the third century B.C. by Jewish scribes, who were direct descendents of those trained in Ezra's Great Synagogue of Jerusalem. They were complete experts in the text, being very well versed in Hebrew and Greek.

This translation became very popular among Jews in the first two centuries before Christ because many Jews in those days did not understand Hebrew. Their ancestors had left Israel centuries before, and generation after generation gradually lost the ability to read the Scriptures in Hebrew.

Many of the Jews in Jesus' day used the Septuagint as their Bible. Quite naturally, the early Christians also used the Septuagint in their meetings and for personal reading; and many of the New Testament apostles quoted it when they wrote the Gospels and Epistles in Greek. What is most fascinating is that the order of the books in the Septuagint is the same order in our Bibles today, and not like the Hebrew scrolls....

Jesus and the Apostles studied, memorized, used, quoted, and read most often from the Bible of their day, the Septuagint. Since Matthew wrote primarily to convince the Jews that Jesus of Nazareth was indeed their promised Messiah, it follows as a matter of course that his Gospel is saturated with the Hebrew Scriptures. Yet, when Jesus quotes the Old Testament in Matthew, He uses the Hebrew text only 10% of the time, but the Greek LXX translation 90% of the time!"

What Bible Did Jesus Use? - Genealogy and Jewish Heritage