Israel’s Final Restoration

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
Brother oldhermit,

Are the times of the gentiles, Lk 21:20-24, ended?

Is Jerusalem Restored to Israel?
The time of the Gentiles simply referred to the time when the gospel would be delivered to the Gentiles. This is not an exclusion of the Jews who continue to hear the gospel.

Yes, if you understand what Jerusalem is.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The time of the Gentiles simply referred to the time when the gospel would be delivered to the Gentiles. This is not an exclusion of the Jews who continue to hear the gospel.

Yes, if you understand what Jerusalem is.
hmm, when in the history of the world has the gospel not been delivered to the gentiles.

Just asking. Especially since all through out the OT. Gentiles were being delivered the gospel throughout. Even one Jew spent three days in the belly of a fish because he refused to give the gospel to a gentile city..
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
hmm, when in the history of the world has the gospel not been delivered to the gentiles.

Just asking. Especially since all through out the OT. Gentiles were being delivered the gospel throughout. Even one Jew spent three days in the belly of a fish because he refused to give the gospel to a gentile city..
Perhaps it would be better if you and I did not respond to one another's posts. We are not even in the same universe in our view of scripture.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
EG, I addressed EVERY one of your highlighted points in my presentation of Acts 2.

No you did not, You spent very little time even addressing ezek 37. And when I brought the point out that what you said in your post concerning ezek 37 could not possibly be translated by acts 2. All you did was attack me again, And tell me you can not see how I CAN NOT SEE HOW PEACE WAS RESTORED (yet another attack)

How do you expect me to give you any leeway when all you do every time we talk is attack?



Even beyond this, I addressed them again when you repeated them. I really do not see this going anywhere. I am sorry beyond measure that you are not able to see this.
Yeah, You responded with another ATTACK, and soured me, why do you think I did not even read anything else you posted in that post? You do not try to convince people of a spiritual truth you want to show them by attacking them and then expect them to read everything you have to say.

Lets take a look..(not that you will listen to a word I say, You never have....

Concerning being one nation in the land.. you said this

O course it happened in Acts. Look at the last few verses of the chapter. "Everyone kept feeling a sense of awe; and many wonders and signs were taking place through the apostles. And all those who had believed were together and had all things in common; and they began selling their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone might have need. Day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of heart, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved." This is Judah and Israel together under one King - Messiah.
And this is one nation? Do you even know what a nation is? A nation has a soverign ruler. It lives in its own border, It is not enslaved by foreign leaders, It is not bound by foreign rules and regulations. It is not paying taxes to foreign leaders.

This is an organization, or is living under roman tyranny, Who is blessed by God while under than tyranny, Much the same way Daniel was blessed when he was held under Babylonian rule.


You continued.

Yes, that is what Joel said would happen to those of Judah and Israel who would not repent. This was the urging that Peter gave them in verse 40 saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation!” There reasonPeter urged them to save themselves from that perverse generation was because God was about to destroy that generation in a few years. Those who called upon the name of the Lord would be saved from that perverse generation.
That perverse generation had been around for a few centuries. Most of the people in that group was most likely martyred, many probably died in 70 AD when rome savaged them, Peter was crucified, Steven was stoned..

And this looks like peace??

Then you continued, In response to God taking the LAND OF JUDAH and putting them all in EXILE because they failed to obey the lord God according to lev 26.. your reponse?

This destruction was indeed fulfilled by Nebuchadnezzar. The Babylonians captured Jerusalem in about 596 BC and In 2Kings 24, Nebuchadnezzar appointed Jehoiakin king of Judea and he served as a tribute king to Nebuchadnezzar for eight years. Nebuchadnezzar then replaced Jehoiakin with Zedekiah. It was during this time that the text says in verse 14, "Then he led away into exile all Jerusalem and all the captains and all the mighty men of valor, ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and the smiths. None remained except the poorest people of the land." After eleven years, Zedekiah rebelled. In verse 20 we learn that "He did evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that Jehoiakim had done. For through the anger of the LORD this came about in Jerusalem and Judah until He cast them out from His presence. And Zedekiah rebelled against the king of Babylon." It was during this time that Daniel was taken into captivity. In chapter 25 Nebuchadnezzar placed the "city was under siege until the eleventh year of King Zedekiah." After the city was destroyed and the captives led away, Nebuchadnezzar left only a small number of "the poorest of the land to be vinedressers and plowmen." These were left only as slaves to care for the fields. If memory serves, this took place in about 605 BC. No more pupet king, no more city, no more temple. Jerusalem was utterly destroyed. This is the fulfillment of the promise of the Lord in Lev 26.
LEV 26 spoke of the WHOLE LAND, the WHOLE NATION, You do not fulfill a promised punishment by just taking away a city.

God did not promise to just destroy the city of Jerusalem, and take away its inhabitants, Jerusalem is just a small peace of land in the WHOLE NATION. When Syria defeated isreal. THE WHOLE NATIONS WAS DESTROYED. No one was left. the only people who made it were those who left and went to Judah. The rest where utterly destroyed, Isreal (the borthern kingdom) ceased to exist.

But the 12 tribes were saved, why? many of then fled and went to Judah, God kept a remant even then.

should I even bother going on??









 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Perhaps it would be better if you and I did not respond to one another's posts. We are not even in the same universe in our view of scripture.
no we are not. But that is the same way with a lot of people

This is a bible discussion forum, If your going to post a view, expect to have that view questioned by people who do not agree.

I do not know why it is only a select few in here seem to have trouble responding to people who do not agree with them.. when most of the people in here have no issue..
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Perhaps it would be better if you and I did not respond to one another's posts. We are not even in the same universe in our view of scripture.
By the way, Again, Why did you not answer my question, The question is not just for me, but everyone who may be reading your post. I am sure I am not the only one who has that question.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
By the way, Again, Why did you not answer my question, The question is not just for me, but everyone who may be reading your post. I am sure I am not the only one who has that question.
Very well. The first time we have a record of the gospel being preached to the Gentiles is in Acts 2 because among those present on that day were proselytes to Judaism. The first Gentile convert that was recorded is the conversion of the Eunuch in chapter 8. The first uncircumcised Gentiles received the gospel in Chapter 1 in the conversion of Cornelius. This is the time of the Gentiles.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
no we are not. But that is the same way with a lot of people

This is a bible discussion forum, If your going to post a view, expect to have that view questioned by people who do not agree.

I do not know why it is only a select few in here seem to have trouble responding to people who do not agree with them.. when most of the people in here have no issue..
I am not going to do this with you EG. If anyone else wants to know the answer to a question I will be happy to address it, but you and I are done.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Very well. The first time we have a record of the gospel being preached to the Gentiles is in Acts 2
So your saying when Jonah told Ninevah to repent, He was not showing them the gospel? Wow. How did people of the OT get saved anyway?

because among those present on that day were proselytes to Judaism. The first Gentile convert that was recorded is the conversion of the Eunuch in chapter 8. The first uncircumcised Gentiles received the gospel in Chapter 1 in the conversion of Cornelius. This is the time of the Gentiles.
A no gentile was saved in the OT?

I do not think you are thinking this out very clearly. I am asking you direct questions to try to get you to think..


scripturally, the time of the gentiles has been going on since Babylon took over jerusalem, and is has not ended today. this (gospel) view of the time of the gentile does not make sense, Gentiles were saved long before Isreal became a nation, While they were a nation, and will be saved long after the nation is restored again.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I am not going to do this with you EG. If anyone else wants to know the answer to a question I will be happy to address it, but you and I are done.

I am asking you on their account,, I want them to hear all sides of the story..
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63
The time of the Gentiles simply referred to the time when the gospel would be delivered to the Gentiles. This is not an exclusion of the Jews who continue to hear the gospel.

Yes, if you understand what Jerusalem is.
In the context of Lk 21:24, isn't it talking about the literal city of Jerusalem being trodden down by the gentile nations?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
In the context of Lk 21:24, isn't it talking about the literal city of Jerusalem being trodden down by the gentile nations?
[SUP]24 [/SUP]And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

which begs th question, If this is true, what happens to Jerusalem and the captives which are led to the other nations, when this "time of the gentile" is fulfilled?
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63
[SUP]24 [/SUP]And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

which begs th question, If this is true, what happens to Jerusalem and the captives which are led to the other nations, when this "time of the gentile" is fulfilled?
Israel will rule Jerusalem again, the time is now.

But it is not all good news.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
In the context of Lk 21:24, isn't it talking about the literal city of Jerusalem being trodden down by the gentile nations?
Yes, this is talking about the destruction. Paul makes this connection in Rom. 11:25-32. "For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery, so that you will not be wise in your own estimation, that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, 'THE DELIVERER WILL COME FROM ZION, HE WILL REMOVE UNGODLINESS FROM JACOB. THIS IS MY COVENANT WITH THEM, wHEN I TAKE AWAY THEIR SINS.' From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers; for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. For just as you once were disobedient to God, but now have been shown mercy because of their disobedience, so these also now have been disobedient, that because of the mercy shown to you they also may now be shown mercy. For God has shut up all in disobedience so that He may show mercy to all."
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63
Yes, this is talking about the destruction. Paul makes this connection in Rom. 11:25-32. "For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery, so that you will not be wise in your own estimation, that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, 'THE DELIVERER WILL COME FROM ZION, HE WILL REMOVE UNGODLINESS FROM JACOB. THIS IS MY COVENANT WITH THEM, wHEN I TAKE AWAY THEIR SINS.' From the standpoint of the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but from the standpoint of God’s choice they are beloved for the sake of the fathers; for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. For just as you once were disobedient to God, but now have been shown mercy because of their disobedience, so these also now have been disobedient, that because of the mercy shown to you they also may now be shown mercy. For God has shut up all in disobedience so that He may show mercy to all."

Brother oldhermit,

What about the time, when it says "until the times of the gentiles be fulfilled"?

Doesn't it mean that there will come a time when the gentiles won't control Jerusalem, that Israel will control the city again?

What are your thoughts on the restoration of Israel to Jerusalem, as relating to Lk 21:20-24?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Israel will rule Jerusalem again, the time is now.

But it is not all good news.

They will? That's not what I read? I read when this happens, Christ will rule Jerusalem. Is that not the case?

According to Daniel. how is the final gentile ruler destroyed, by what event?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
613
113
70
Alabama
Brother oldhermit,

What about the time, when it says "until the of the gentiles be fulfilled"?

Doesn't it mean that there will come a time when the gentiles won't control Jerusalem, that Israel will control the city again?

What are your thoughts on the restoration of Israel to Jerusalem, as relating to Lk 21:20-24?
I am not really sure what the implications would be regarding the Jews regaining control of the City. We know that Jesus said that this city would be destroyed and it was because of the hardening of the hearts of Israel. Along with the destruction of the city was the total destruction of the temple and it would never be rebuilt. Perhaps some of the questions people have regarding the issue of Jerusalem stems from a lack of understanding what the true Jerusalem is, also what true Israel is.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I am not really sure what the implications would be regarding the Jews regaining control of the City. We know that Jesus said that this city would be destroyed and it was because of the hardening of the hearts of Israel. Along with the destruction of the city was the total destruction of the temple and it would never be rebuilt. Perhaps some of the questions people have regarding the issue of Jerusalem stems from a lack of understanding what the true Jerusalem is, also what true Israel is.

Can someone please show me where it has ever been said that the jewish temple would never be rebuilt?
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63

They will? That's not what I read? I read when this happens, Christ will rule Jerusalem. Is that not the case?

According to Daniel. how is the final gentile ruler destroyed, by what event?
Brother EG, if you are not offended by the initials,

Lk 21:20-24, I'm interested in this passage because of it's simplicity.

According to these verses, all that has to happen for the times of the gentiles to end, is to have Israel in control of Jerusalem again. This has further prophetic implications.

If you want to apply other verses to this passage, to make additional requirements for the fulfillment of the ToG's to end, that can be discussed.

But in Lk 21:20-24, I don't see any other requirements.
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63
I am not really sure what the implications would be regarding the Jews regaining control of the City. We know that Jesus said that this city would be destroyed and it was because of the hardening of the hearts of Israel. Along with the destruction of the city was the total destruction of the temple and it would never be rebuilt. Perhaps some of the questions people have regarding the issue of Jerusalem stems from a lack of understanding what the true Jerusalem is, also what true Israel is.

I Would probably agree with you about who the true Jerusalem/Israel is.

But here is my point,

The ToG's is clearly related to the gentiles controlling the city of Jerusalem.

Can we make a stand either way?

Yes, this scripture stands fulfilled today. or

No, it does not?

I'm on the yes side.