God stated that it was not good for man to be alone so in Genesis 2:20, He brought forth all the cattle, birds of the sky, and beasts of the field, and Adam named them BUT there was not found a suitable helper for him, it is this time that God places Adam under sleep and makes woman. Could Adam have found a suitable helper and if not why did God have him look to His other creations first? Could it be that WE are the ones that get hung up on the sexuality instead of the companionship aspect? Also God told Adam that for this reason father shall leave mother and cleave unto his wife, thereby everyone it seems thinks that made marriage pre-ordained by God, I have considered rather that it was actually a blessing unto Adam and Eve the same to be said of go forth be fruitful and multiply. Let me explain, if marriage was truly what God had intended and His plan, then why for this moment in time, and yet in the resseruction the Lord said there would be no being given in marriage or marriage? So if i believed that God had not been just blessing Adam and Eve and had actually intended and planned marriage, then i would have to accept that for some reason God changed His mind for the eternal which to me is moment of resseruction to forever.
God does not change His mind, also what of the scripture of after the Lord said no more marriage in the reserruction where his disciples stated it is better not to marry....Matthew 19:11 the Lord replies not everyone can accept this word only to those who it is given. For some are eunuchs born of women, and some are made by man, and some are for the kingdom of heaven's sake, the one who can accept this should ACCEPT IT....so think on this if go forth be fruitful and multiply were a command unto all of mankind, how be it possible unless God intended then incest? God forbid! Rather this was a blessing once again upon those He spoke it too, like Adam and Eve, Abraham, and others. And what of these eunuchs born of women? Are they what we used to refer to as hermorphidite? or now intersex? Could this "anomaly" sort of speak occur because Adam had the potential to be either the man he was created to be or the female that was created from OUT of him? Also why are there no words in red that He spoke of homosexuality? ACCEPT IT, is what He stated in regards to eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake...for when we make love is it not spiritual? the so called world melts away and it is just you two right? How does it be so reborn new creature IN Christ, who is baptized by His Holy Spirit? That world that melted away, did Christ, and His Holy Spirit, along with the heavenly Father melt away as well, considering He knows every hair on your heads?. And why so much hatred towards the gay community for unalienable rights as man and woman for a just brief moment in time, and then also believe whole heartedly that in the resseruction those precious vows and marriage will be no more? Also consider it is a popular belief that the telling of Lot refers to homosexuality, again i have considered that i guess one could state homosexual rape since it was all men, but we don't refer to it as such we refer to it as rape pure and simple, i am certain that if they had accepted Lot's daughters, the daughters would not have been willing would they? Same to be said of the angels disguised as men, if Lot had turned them over would it been consentual? Of course not! just simply considerations if you don't mind brethren
much love and blessings Father to those who read this and Lord Jesus to those who respond let their be You, kindness, patience, longsuffering, wisdom, charity, grace, mercy, truth, and love, thank you Lord Jesus my saviour, my King, my God.
There is a whole lot being said here and i think it is of very very great importance the context of Biblical "marriage" be explained.
In genesis chapter 2 :24 God said " [FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." This was the understanding of what marriage was suppose to be before the fall of man. As we progress through the Word of God this Narrative has never changed however, the context of the relationship with God, man , and women did change after the fall. Gen 3:16-19
Marriage in the bible continue after the fall in the same manner as it was intended in the Garden the only exceptions was rulers, Kings etc... But the LAW given to Moses by God reinforces the nominative of marriage as that being one man and one women. God did not change HIS mind in the " context to marriage" of the flesh meaning those who are alive on the earth today. Marriage in the Context of the "Church" as the Church is known Symbolically as " Bride of Christ" this is a spiritual application as the Bible says
" [/FONT]
Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif] [/FONT]
cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption." 1Cor [FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
15:50[/FONT][FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
The flesh = sin and "sin" will not enter Heaven.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
Before the Fall we do not know how God would have provided wives for the son s of Adam The bible is silent on this .[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
But we do know that God did not create sin nor did HE make incest, homosexuality, Fornication and all other sexual or fleshly sin. These sins of the Flesh manifested through the desires of the sinful nature or the fleshly nature not a Spiritual nature born of God. as Rom 8:1-10 tell us.
again in context to " eunuchs"
Matt 19: 12 "
[/FONT]
For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]:"[/FONT][FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
(this could be those who sexual) [FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif][/FONT]and there are some [/FONT]
eunuchs, which were madeeunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
The context of Matt 19:12 has to be kept in context to the full passage.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
When Jesus says eunuchs that were born from their mothers womb means two thing depending on the context 1. one who was raised for service for the king. 2. One who has a birth defect it has nothing to do with " [/FONT]
hermorphidite" the Greek translation doesn't even suggest that.
the next point Those that "were made eunuchs of men" is speaking about to castrate, to neuter a man.
The later part "[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. "[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
This is speaking of those who have chosen to be single or not willing to marry for the service of the Kingdom of God.
This is a gift Jesus said "[/FONT]
He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."
Not all are able to do this. [FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
Paul again says this too 1 cor 7:7-9[/FONT]
[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
Jesus and Paul address the very same thing. Service to God and denying the flesh or sexual desires done while on earth. This is not a mandatory thing those who cannot do this should marry as Paul said and Jesus too said "[/FONT][FONT=arial, helvetica, sans serif]
"[/FONT]
He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." this has nothing to do with sexual sin or homosexuality .