Thank you for defining the difference between the two concepts.
My concept or way of understanding is God is his nature, his responses, his perspective. So the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are one, eternal, and also separate. Maybe he could create his essence in many other expressions of who he is.
By saying this one could say this is polytheism, except each party is the same in expression, so not distinct as you find in hinduism. The Lord appears to me to be saying, love, however it is expressed overcomes all things, and is the essence of all creation, which is why Jesus came as a simple man, not highly ranked or given undue respect and honour.
To walk as he walked is to disown the marriage to wealth and power and just live to love. For some this language means soppy sentimentalism, but it actually is brutal, and submission to death at the hands of evil men, which all the apostles suffered. I use the words appears to me, because I have great love and respect to my Lord, and I barely grasp the interplay given to us in the gospel, but I think that is the point. It is love that should drive us, and not argument, or winning or proving something, but seeing and meeting need.
So I see truth in both positions, which may seem a contradiction, but that is probably why it is best to be humble, and understand who you are talking about, before whom we all will answer...