Mormons / Latter Day Saints

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
B

biscuit

Guest
#81
Hello VCO, I can guarantee that your Jesus is different from my Jesus, but we are both Christians. In fact I would bet that if you lined up 1,000 active, go-to-church-on-Sunday Christians you would get at least 300 different Jesus's.

Just look at the thread "once saved, always saved". There are probably 15 different Christians that have posted their beliefs about this simple subject, but you find that there is a war going on in the Christian churches about this simple subject. A literal verbal war. Now you take this seemingly clear cut "by grace we are saved, not of works lest we boast" subject and you get 1/4 of Christians that believe it, 1/4 that don't believe it, and 1/4 who believe parts of it, but not all of it, and you get 1/4 who don't know anything about it. In other words you would be hard pressed to get a consensus.

Now take a very difficult subject about Jesus being eternally begotten of the Father and what that means (this is where you get into the divinity question) and you certainly won't be able to get a consensus. Most Christians would be lost even to approach the subject. On the first level, you may be able to come close to a concensus, but even in this first level you will find division. The second level is where there will be some major divisions and the third level, forget it, the arguments can ge violent.

So you are chiding the Mormons for not believing the Jesus that you believe and immediately brand their Jesus a false Jesus.
You must be honest then and brand 90% of the Christian churches as believing in a false Jesus too. Seriously be honest and you know that I am right, just read this chat forum for proof. I love this chat forum but there is never consensus. Never.

So whose Jesus is the true Jesus. I believe I worship the true Jesus. I am sure you, VCO worship the true Jesus. I can tell you honestly that my Jesus is different from your Jesus. So which Jesus is true. I get all, and I mean all of my Christology from the Bible (KJV most of the time). I am sure you get your Christology from the Bible too. I beleive the Holy Ghiost has witnessed to me that Jesus is the Son of God, the Savior of all mankind that believe in him. I believe you have had the witness of the Holy Ghost that what you believe about Jesus is correct. So what do we do now? Who is teaching false doctrine and who is teaching the truth, we both seem to be reading and praying alike.

Lets look at our own Christian churches and their glaring divisions before we call the Mormons or any other Christian sect false teahers.

I know the Mormons teach some radical things about Jesus, but I also know they back up their teachings from the Bible. It is interesting to have discussions with them because they put away their other books and open the Bible, usually the KJV and they prove their point. It is tough sledding with those Mormons who have studied and know the Bible. Those who have not studied look like deer-in-the-headlights. Does that sound familiar about our churches.
The center core of Mormonism isn't Jesus Christ ... it is Joseph Smith, the so-called prophet. Spoke with two of their missionaries (LDS) on bicycles, and one of them asked me why they were not having luck converting. I told them that in their conversation with me, they had mentioned Joseph Smith 17 times and Jesus Christ only twice. BTW, awhile back I lived 3 blocks away from a large LDS church in my community.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
#82
Originally posted by VCO
Colossians 4:15-16 (HCSB)
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Give my greetings to the brothers in Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her home.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]When this letter has been read among you, have it read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and see that you also read the letter from Laodicea.

WHAT, you didn't think I would CHECK your sources? BUSTED! Another untruth pedaled by the Mormon Church, it says FROM Laodicea, NOT TO Laodicea.
There are 2 problems with this post.

1) from a simple reading of this verse it seems to me that the Colossians are to have the epistle written to them, sent to the church of Laodiceans and have it read there. And that the epistle from Laodicea, written to the Laodiceans be read in Colossae. Now I could be wrong, but it seems pretty straight forward.
And this is a good example of my problem. If we can not come to a mutual agreement about this easy scripture, how will we ever be able to agree on complex, Godhead type scriptures.

Tell me how you read this scripture and maybe we can resolve our difference.

2) This kind of language: What, you didn't think I would CHECK your sources? Busted! Another untruth pedaled by the Mormon church... is truly anti-Christian. I would like to have a civil discussion about the gospel as represented in the scriptures. Maybe you can help me with some things that I struggle with. It would be good, however, not to accuse me of pedaling an untruth, everytime you think you have won a point.

So again, let me know what you think Colossians 4:16 is telling us.

In fact I open the question up to the forum to answer the above question. Thank you.
 
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
#83
Originally posted by VCO

Thank GOD that HE saved me from myself, for HIS PURPOSES.
You are a good man VCO, and what a wonderful conversion story. I want to have friends that are this close to Jesus, so don't give up on me if we disagree about complex gospel questions. Thanks for being here.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#84
Mormon bashing late are we? Remember you'd help him if he's injured, then you would let him know he's going to hell when he's better?

NO! I would warn Him as soon as the Holy Spirit led me to tell Him. If I could see he was dying before the ambulance could get there, I would continue to try to stop the bleeding and at the same time, BEG him over and over until his last breath, to repent and turn away from the Mormon Jesus to the Real Jesus of the Bible. That is how sure I am that the Mormon Jesus is a counterfeit of the REAL LORD JESUS CHRIST. I would desperately try to save his spirit and soul with the TRUTH OF GOD, while Brigham's Young's solution was "just kill him." You tell me which is GOD's way and which is EVIL.

Revelation 3:19 (NASB)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] 'Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline; therefore be zealous and repent.

Get your theology from the BIBLE, not from Brigham Young or Joseph Smith, they are BOTH False Prophets who contradict the Bible:

Mark 3:28 (NASB)
[SUP]28 [/SUP] "Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; {with only one exception}

And both Brigham Young and Joseph Smith said there are sins that cannot be forgiven unless their blood is shed for those sins. THAT IS A LIE, and Satan is the father of all lies. THERE ARE NO SINS THAT THE BIBLE SAYS A MAN'S BLOOD MUST BE SHED FOR TO RECEIVE FORGIVENESS. The Blood of Jesus Christ paid for all sins except ONE.

The only sin that anyone goes to HELL for, is rejecting the Real Jesus Christ of the Bible as LORD, which means MASTER. That is blaspheming the work of the HOLY SPIRIT, who strives to enable human beings to believe from the HEART that the FATHER and JESUS and the HOLY SPIRIT are ONE GOD, and to receive Jesus as LORD. When they reject that teaching from the BIBLE thinking it is from a demon, it is the ONLY unforgivable sin. HE IS NOT YOUR MASTER if you add other books to the BIBLE, erroneously thinking they are also GOD's Word.

Mark 3:29-30 (NASB)
[SUP]29 [/SUP] but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin"—
[SUP]30 [/SUP] because they were saying, "He has an unclean spirit."
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#85
You are a good man VCO, and what a wonderful conversion story. I want to have friends that are this close to Jesus, so don't give up on me if we disagree about complex gospel questions. Thanks for being here.
AMEN and AMEN! GOD did give up on you, so I will not either.

Here is how obvious and simple God's plan of Salvation is:

Revelation 3:19 (NASB)
[SUP]19[/SUP]
'Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline; therefore be zealous and repent. {we must admit we are sinners, confessing it to GOD. 1 John 1:9}

John 1:12-13 (HCSB)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] But to all who did receive Him, {No more and no less} He gave them the right to be children of God, to those who believe in His name,
[SUP]13 [/SUP] who were born, not of blood, or of the will of the flesh, or of the will of man, but of God. {That is allowing the Holy Spirit to come into your heart to lead you and to bring your human spirit to eternal life. John 3:3-7}

Receive Him as WHAT THOUGH?
Don't you know GOD will show you all answers to questions in HIS WORD the Bible:

Colossians 2:6 (NIV)
[SUP]6 [/SUP] So then, just as you received Christ Jesus as Lord, continue to live in Him,


Romans 10:9 (NASB)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] that if you confess {Not just profess, as it is only a confession when it absolutely is true about yourself.} with your mouth Jesus as Lord {Meaning MASTER, willingly surrendering control to HIM.}, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;

And here is the best part of HIS promise!

Romans 5:5 (NKJV)
[SUP]5 [/SUP] Now hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to us.

That Love for GOD produces a joyful willingness to obey HIM, and the new born human spirit produces satisfying fruit:

Galatians 5:22-23 (NKJV)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
[SUP]23 [/SUP] gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.

And a knowledge within us that our human spirit truly is alive forever, and thinking in tune with the WILL OF GOD.
Yes it does battle with mind of the flesh at first, but as we mature spiritually studying His Word the mind of the spirit will grow stronger and eventually dominate the mind of the flesh.

John 5:24 (ESV)
[SUP]24 [/SUP] Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.

The human spirit was not born to that eternal life at natural birth, it must be born again.

John 3:3-7 (ESV)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
[SUP]4 [/SUP] Nicodemus said to him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?”
[SUP]5 [/SUP] Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.
[SUP]6 [/SUP] That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
[SUP]7 [/SUP] Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’
 
Last edited:
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
#86
NO! I would warn Him as soon as the Holy Spirit led me to tell Him. If I could see he was dying before the ambulance could get there, I would continue to try to stop the bleeding and at the same time, BEG him over and over until his last breath, to repent and turn away from the Mormon Jesus to the Real Jesus of the Bible. That is how sure I am that the Mormon Jesus is a counterfeit of the REAL LORD JESUS CHRIST. I would desperately try to save his spirit and soul with the TRUTH OF GOD, while Brigham's Young's solution was "just kill him." You tell me which is GOD's way and which is EVIL.

Revelation 3:19 (NASB)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] 'Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline; therefore be zealous and repent.

Get your theology from the BIBLE, not from Brigham Young or Joseph Smith, they are BOTH False Prophets who contradict the Bible:

Mark 3:28 (NASB)
[SUP]28 [/SUP] "Truly I say to you, all sins shall be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; {with only one exception}

And both Brigham Young and Joseph Smith said there are sins that cannot be forgiven unless their blood is shed for those sins. THAT IS A LIE, and Satan is the father of all lies. THERE ARE NO SINS THAT THE BIBLE SAYS A MAN'S BLOOD MUST BE SHED FOR TO RECEIVE FORGIVENESS. The Blood of Jesus Christ paid for all sins except ONE.

The only sin that anyone goes to HELL for, is rejecting the Real Jesus Christ of the Bible as LORD, which means MASTER. That is blaspheming the work of the HOLY SPIRIT, who strives to enable human beings to believe from the HEART that the FATHER and JESUS and the HOLY SPIRIT are ONE GOD, and to receive Jesus as LORD. When they reject that teaching from the BIBLE thinking it is from a demon, it is the ONLY unforgivable sin. HE IS NOT YOUR MASTER if you add other books to the BIBLE, erroneously thinking they are also GOD's Word.

Mark 3:29-30 (NASB)
[SUP]29 [/SUP] but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin"—
[SUP]30 [/SUP] because they were saying, "He has an unclean spirit."
True repentance can only come by the shedding of blood. We need to be more like David when his child died. And blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is saying that God cannot forgive anything. This is the only reason we die today.


The the flesh profits nothing, correct? Then why act as if it does with with God when it comes to salvation? Even to be found in Christ, you must first crucify the flesh. Now gown many dead men can see sin still when they are to know nothing?
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#87
The center core of Mormonism isn't Jesus Christ ... it is Joseph Smith, the so-called prophet. Spoke with two of their missionaries (LDS) on bicycles, and one of them asked me why they were not having luck converting. I told them that in their conversation with me, they had mentioned Joseph Smith 17 times and Jesus Christ only twice. BTW, awhile back I lived 3 blocks away from a large LDS church in my community.
I don't think of myself as pro Mormon, hopefully pro fairness, pro open mindedness... I had two lady missionaries come to my door... First one said they were going around talking to people about Jesus, I sensed a kindred spirit... I couldn't talk right then, so asked them to come back... When they returned, second one spoke, said they were going around offering free lessons about lehi or someone... I declined... My gut reaction, first one is part of body of Christ... That's my take, God knows...
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#88
There are 2 problems with this post.

1) from a simple reading of this verse it seems to me that the Colossians are to have the epistle written to them, sent to the church of Laodiceans and have it read there. And that the epistle from Laodicea, written to the Laodiceans be read in Colossae. Now I could be wrong, but it seems pretty straight forward.
And this is a good example of my problem. If we can not come to a mutual agreement about this easy scripture, how will we ever be able to agree on complex, Godhead type scriptures.

Tell me how you read this scripture and maybe we can resolve our difference.

2) This kind of language: What, you didn't think I would CHECK your sources? Busted! Another untruth pedaled by the Mormon church... is truly anti-Christian. I would like to have a civil discussion about the gospel as represented in the scriptures. Maybe you can help me with some things that I struggle with. It would be good, however, not to accuse me of pedaling an untruth, everytime you think you have won a point.

So again, let me know what you think Colossians 4:16 is telling us.

In fact I open the question up to the forum to answer the above question. Thank you.
I haven't read all the posts in this thread, sounds like one issue is a missing letter from Paul? I think that's a possible reading of col4:16... I think I heard once that maybe what we call Ephesians is that letter... Is a larger question the canon? The bible doesn't really say which books or words should be in it...
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#89
There are 2 problems with this post.

1) from a simple reading of this verse it seems to me that the Colossians are to have the epistle written to them, sent to the church of Laodiceans and have it read there. And that the epistle from Laodicea, written to the Laodiceans be read in Colossae. Now I could be wrong, but it seems pretty straight forward.
And this is a good example of my problem. If we can not come to a mutual agreement about this easy scripture, how will we ever be able to agree on complex, Godhead type scriptures.

Tell me how you read this scripture and maybe we can resolve our difference.

2) This kind of language: What, you didn't think I would CHECK your sources? Busted! Another untruth pedaled by the Mormon church... is truly anti-Christian. I would like to have a civil discussion about the gospel as represented in the scriptures. Maybe you can help me with some things that I struggle with. It would be good, however, not to accuse me of pedaling an untruth, everytime you think you have won a point.

So again, let me know what you think Colossians 4:16 is telling us.

In fact I open the question up to the forum to answer the above question. Thank you.
You are trying to read stuff into the text that just is not there. REMEMBER corresponding between Churches was the ONLY means of communication between the Churches two thousand years ago. THUS there would have numerous letters going back and forth. Except for the possible occasional letters, Paul knew little of the day by day life and writings of John. ONLY when they were copied and sent to all the Churches, are they letters that the Apostles, KNEW were INSPIRED BY GOD. So if it was a letter sent to Laodicea that Paul is wanting the Laodiceans to read and pass on to the Colossians, it may be one written by PAUL and not THEE LETTER TO THE LAODICEANS DICTATED BY THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND PENNED BY JOHN. You will see that is exactly how the New American Standard Bible translated it, as they thought it implied that Paul wrote it.
HOWEVER, the NASB did put a footnote there explaining that Literal translation from the GREEK only stated the letter and not my letter.

Colossians 4:16 (NASB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] When this letter is read among you, have it also read in the church of the Laodiceans; and you, for your part read [Lit the] my letter that is coming from Laodicea.


Paul was in the CHURCH PLANTING BUSINESS, and then he would move on, but kept in touch with his new congregations via letters, to encourage them and answer any of their questions. Much the same as we are doing now. THUS very few of those letters ever ended up in our New Testament. REMEMBER we ONLY HAVE THE HIGHLIGHTS of Life of Jesus Christ and the Apostles, NOT the TOTAL historical event by event, conversation by conversation of everything that happened:

John 21:25 (NASB)
[SUP]25 [/SUP] And there are also many other things which Jesus did, which if they *were written in detail, I suppose that even the world itself *would not contain the books that *would be written.

So in that verse Col. 4:16, I see only the normal way Churches communicated at the time of PAUL, and maybe Paul was trying to get them to depend on each other for encouragement, so that they would not be devastated when he would be martyred.

But how do we come to an AGREEMENT, perhaps by looking at the entire context, which is actually RULE number 1., and RULE number 2. is do not forget to do RULE number 1.

Colossians 4:12-16 (HCSB)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] Epaphras, who is one of you, a slave of Christ Jesus, greets you. He is always contending for you in his prayers, so that you can stand mature and fully assured in everything God wills.
[SUP]13 [/SUP] For I testify about him that he works hard for you, for those in Laodicea, and for those in Hierapolis.
[SUP]14 [/SUP] Luke, the dearly loved physician, and Demas greet you.
[SUP]15 [/SUP] Give my greetings to the brothers in Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her home.
[SUP]16 [/SUP] When this letter has been read among you, have it read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and see that you also read the letter from Laodicea.

NOW let's see if we can tell who wrote the letter by reading the WHOLE CONTEXT, in the Holman's Christian Standard Bible.

John is NOT even mentioned, and if JOHN wrote something from GOD back then, PAUL would have gave HIM full credit, just like HE gave LUKE and Demas full credit for passing a greeting to the Colossians. SO no mention of JOHN at ALL, indicates this letter is NOT the one John wrote in Chapter Three of Revelation. AND if Paul had written it, why would Paul ask them to GREET the Laodiceans AGAIN after writing them personally? Luke does not seem to even personally know the Laodiceans, so we can rule him out too. But WHO KNOWS THEM PERSONALLY and is DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT THEM.

Colossians 4:12-13 (NASB)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] Epaphras, who is one of your number, a bondslave of Jesus Christ, sends you his greetings, always laboring earnestly for you in his prayers, that you may stand perfect and fully assured in all the will of God.
[SUP]13 [/SUP] For I testify for him that he has a deep concern for you and for those who are in Laodicea and Hierapolis.

Colossians 4:12-13 (NKJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] Epaphras, who is one of you, a bondservant of Christ, greets you, always laboring fervently for you in prayers, that you may stand perfect and complete in all the will of God.
[SUP]13 [/SUP] For I bear him witness that he has a great zeal for you, and those who are in Laodicea, and those in Hierapolis.

How does PAUL KNOW THIS ABOUT EPAPHRAS, is it not obvious that EPAPHRAS wrote Paul, sending him a copy of what he wrote to the Laodiceans?


By the way, Paul was likely beheaded by the Romans, under Emperor Nero, sometime around May or June of 68 A.D. Paul wrote the letter to the Colossians in 62 A.D., and John penned the Book of Revelation in 96 A.D.
 
Aug 11, 2014
137
1
0
#90
Posted by biscuit
The center core of Mormonism isn't Jesus Christ ... it is Joseph Smith, the so-called prophet. Spoke with two of their missionaries (LDS) on bicycles, and one of them asked me why they were not having luck converting. I told them that in their conversation with me, they had mentioned Joseph Smith 17 times and Jesus Christ only twice. BTW, awhile back I lived 3 blocks away from a large LDS church in my community.
As a Mormon, I would like to answer this. Jesus Christ is truly the center of the Mormon religion. Joseph Smith is important but Jesus always is far more important. That's really quite a dah. If a missionary meets a person who is a believer in Jesus already, there does not have to be much of a conversion to Jesus. The missionary discussions start out with who is Jesus and God the Father and the make up of the Godhead. Some missionaries aren't very smart and if you are a believer they start telling you about how God the Father and His Son Jesus came to the prophet Joseph Smith and they tell the Joseph Smith story. So you as a believer got the Joseph Smith story and for you that wasn't too smart, because you are a Jesus-centered person.

If you were to read a good LDS book about Joseph Smith, you would be amazed at what he accomplished during his life. But not even 1/1,000,000th as amazing as what our Savior Jesus Christ did for us on the cross. Don't ever think that Mormons put Joseph Smith above Jesus Christ. If you hear someone say that, they are not telling the truth because they don't know it.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#91
True repentance can only come by the shedding of blood. We need to be more like David when his child died. And blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is saying that God cannot forgive anything. This is the only reason we die today.


The the flesh profits nothing, correct? Then why act as if it does with with God when it comes to salvation? Even to be found in Christ, you must first crucify the flesh. Now gown many dead men can see sin still when they are to know nothing?
Hebrews 9:22 (NASB)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] And according to the Law, one may almost say, all things are cleansed with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

Hebrews 9:26 (NASB)
[SUP]26 [/SUP] Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.

Colossians 1:19-20 (HCSB)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] For God was pleased ⌊to have⌋ all His fullness dwell in Him,
[SUP]20 [/SUP] and through Him to reconcile everything to Himself by making peacethrough the blood of His cross— whether things on earth or things in heaven.

Hebrews 10:10-14 (NKJV)
[SUP]10 [/SUP] By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
[SUP]11 [/SUP] And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins.
[SUP]12 [/SUP] But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God,
[SUP]13 [/SUP] from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool.
[SUP]14 [/SUP] For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#92
As a Mormon, I would like to answer this. Jesus Christ is truly the center of the Mormon religion. Joseph Smith is important but Jesus always is far more important. That's really quite a dah. If a missionary meets a person who is a believer in Jesus already, there does not have to be much of a conversion to Jesus. The missionary discussions start out with who is Jesus and God the Father and the make up of the Godhead. Some missionaries aren't very smart and if you are a believer they start telling you about how God the Father and His Son Jesus came to the prophet Joseph Smith and they tell the Joseph Smith story. So you as a believer got the Joseph Smith story and for you that wasn't too smart, because you are a Jesus-centered person.

If you were to read a good LDS book about Joseph Smith, you would be amazed at what he accomplished during his life. But not even 1/1,000,000th as amazing as what our Savior Jesus Christ did for us on the cross. Don't ever think that Mormons put Joseph Smith above Jesus Christ. If you hear someone say that, they are not telling the truth because they don't know it.
"Now concerning Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon, I will Quote the History of Joseph Smith, 1979 ed., pg. 83, so you can look this up. There you will find your own Mormon history book quoting Joseph Smith's own Mother:

Speaking of conversations occurring between 1820 and 1824, she said, "Joseph would occasionally give us some of the most amusing recitals that could be imagined. He would describe the ancient inhabitants of this continent, their dress, mode of traveling, and the animals upon which they rode; their cities, their buildings, with every particular, their mode of warfare; and also their religious worship. This he would do with as much ease, seemingly, as if he had spent his whole life among them."

Now remember Joseph Smith claims he received the golden plates in 1827 and claimed he translated them in 1829, which is five years after his own Mother bragged about the made up stories Joseph would entertain the family with, and the same kind of stories end up in the Book of Mormon. Now who do you suppose the real author of the Book of Mormon is?
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#93
As a Mormon, I would like to answer this. Jesus Christ is truly the center of the Mormon religion. Joseph Smith is important but Jesus always is far more important. That's really quite a dah. If a missionary meets a person who is a believer in Jesus already, there does not have to be much of a conversion to Jesus. The missionary discussions start out with who is Jesus and God the Father and the make up of the Godhead. Some missionaries aren't very smart and if you are a believer they start telling you about how God the Father and His Son Jesus came to the prophet Joseph Smith and they tell the Joseph Smith story. So you as a believer got the Joseph Smith story and for you that wasn't too smart, because you are a Jesus-centered person.

If you were to read a good LDS book about Joseph Smith, you would be amazed at what he accomplished during his life. But not even 1/1,000,000th as amazing as what our Savior Jesus Christ did for us on the cross. Don't ever think that Mormons put Joseph Smith above Jesus Christ. If you hear someone say that, they are not telling the truth because they don't know it.
Do us a favor and kindly us the term "the Mormon Jesus Christ is truly the center of the Mormon religion" and "the Mormon Godhead"; because You CERTAINLY do not teach the SAME Jesus Christ, nor the SAME Godhead that we believe in and Teach.
 
Apr 24, 2012
263
1
0
#94
Originally posted by VCO
How does PAUL KNOW THIS ABOUT EPAPHRAS, is it not obvious that
EPAPHRAS wrote Paul, sending him a copy of what he wrote to the Laodiceans?
I did read your entire post, and thank you for your research. But you are wise enough to know that it all comes down to your above statement.

It is possible that Epaphras wrote Paul. It is even possible that he gave a copy to the church of Laodicea. But is this copy of Epaphras's letter, the letter that Paul was referring to when he said, you also read my letter from Laodicea(NASB)? I believe this is quite a stretch for Paul to have Epaphras's letter read to the Collossians, since he was not an apostle.

I believe you already have the answer in the NASB, which solves this minor issue when Paul says "my" letter. I still believe it is Paul's letter to the Laodiceans that he wanted the Colossians to read. Some have reasoned that the letter may have been a letter to the Ephesians? I suppose it could. But that would be another large stretch, just to bypass the possibility that it is lost and not part of the cannon and it should be. If it should, and it was found, I really believe that many would deny it, for it would be adding to the Bible. A totally unnecessary denial since the warning in Revelations refers to that prophetic stand-alone book, not the whole Bible.

dan_473 made an interesting statement in post #88, when he said that the scriptures are silent as to what letters are to be added to the cannon. There were many, many letters that were lost or rejected by the Constantine Bishops when they perviewed what they thought should be included. In fact Revelations was left off of many lists because to the list makers it was too bizarre.

Good discussion. I enjoy reading about your research and I hope you are enjoying the discussion too.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#95
How does a Mormon attain to eternal life? How does a Mormon receive forgiveness of their sins?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#96
I did read your entire post, and thank you for your research. But you are wise enough to know that it all comes down to your above statement.

It is possible that Epaphras wrote Paul. It is even possible that he gave a copy to the church of Laodicea. But is this copy of Epaphras's letter, the letter that Paul was referring to when he said, you also read my letter from Laodicea(NASB)? I believe this is quite a stretch for Paul to have Epaphras's letter read to the Collossians, since he was not an apostle.

I believe you already have the answer in the NASB, which solves this minor issue when Paul says "my" letter. I still believe it is Paul's letter to the Laodiceans that he wanted the Colossians to read. Some have reasoned that the letter may have been a letter to the Ephesians? I suppose it could. But that would be another large stretch, just to bypass the possibility that it is lost and not part of the cannon and it should be. If it should, and it was found, I really believe that many would deny it, for it would be adding to the Bible. A totally unnecessary denial since the warning in Revelations refers to that prophetic stand-alone book, not the whole Bible.



dan_473 made an interesting statement in post #88, when he said that the scriptures are silent as to what letters are to be added to the cannon. There were many, many letters that were lost or rejected by the Constantine Bishops when they perviewed what they thought should be included. In fact Revelations was left off of many lists because to the list makers it was too bizarre.

Good discussion. I enjoy reading about your research and I hope you are enjoying the discussion too.

I am glad we could come to some kind of agreement. How about we ask Paul if it was his letter, when we get to Heaven?

Where do you get the idea that it "is quite a stretch for Paul to have Epaphras's letter read to the Collossians, since he was not an apostle." Theologians have been writing Commentaries and Books since the beginning, and since they did not have any other way to communicate, and because it was TOO expensive and time consuming to travel, Letter Writing was the next CHOICE, and copying would have been SEVERELY limited too, because paper or parchment was VERY EXPENSIVE TOO. So passing on a letter from an obvious theologian, (look at how Paul praised his work), would have been the cheapest way to share the writings of a respected theologian. Paul was nearing the END of his Ministry, and training theologians to carry on the work of the Ministry when He was GONE. I believe that is exactly why Epaphra is even mentioned and praised.

As for your theory that Revelation is a "Stand Alone" book. We will just have to agree to disagree on that one. Because, I ABSOLUTELY believe GOD inspired Every Word from Gen. 1:1 through the final AMEN of Rev. 22:1. THESE books are not the writings of Men but the very thoughts that GOD put in their Heads, AND GOD KNEW THEY WOULD BE COMPILED INTO A SINGLE BOOK CALLED THE HOLY BIBLE or the WORD OF GOD.

2 Timothy 3:16-17 (HCSB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness,
[SUP]17 [/SUP] so that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

2 Peter 1:19-21 (HCSB)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] So we have the prophetic word strongly confirmed. You will do well to pay attention to it, as to a lamp shining in a dismal place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
[SUP]20 [/SUP] First of all, you should know this: No prophecy of Scripture comes from one’s own interpretation,
[SUP]21 [/SUP] because no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead, men spoke from God as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

I also absolutely believe that the complilation of the Holy Scriptures was Under the Direction of the HOLY SPIRIT. Thus the Bible in it's original manuscripts was PERFECT. And I believe the PERFECT THING mentioned in the following verse, certainly is the BIBLE.

1 Corinthians 13:8-10 (HCSB)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will come to an end; as for languages, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will come to an end.
[SUP]9 [/SUP] For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
[SUP]10 [/SUP] But when the perfect comes, the partial will come to an end.
Psalm 19:7 (HCSB)
[SUP]7 [/SUP] The instruction of the LORD is perfect, renewing one’s life; the testimony of the LORD is trustworthy, making the inexperienced wise.

Deuteronomy 32:3-4 (HCSB)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] For I will proclaim Yahweh’s name. Declare the greatness of our God!
[SUP]4 [/SUP] The Rock—His work is perfect; all His ways are entirely just. A faithful God, without prejudice, He is righteous and true.

AND the Scriptures ARE NOT SILENT as to what Letters or manuscripts are to be added to the Cannon. Here is why the Apocrypha Books were REJECTED.

Mark 16:20 (HCSB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] And they went out and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them and confirming the word by the accompanying signs.

The NEW WORDS from GOD were ALWAYS confirmed by the Apostles or Prophets, doing miracles. Remember Satan loves to immitate GOD to decieve:

2 Thessalonians 2:9 (HCSB)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] The coming ⌊of the lawless one⌋ is based on Satan’s working, with all kinds of false miracles, signs, and wonders,

No verifiable miracles, by a Prophet of GOD or Apostle, and the writing are not part of GOD's Word, and are only the writings of theologians.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#97
I am glad we could come to some kind of agreement. How about we ask Paul if it was his letter, when we get to Heaven?

Where do you get the idea that it "is quite a stretch for Paul to have Epaphras's letter read to the Collossians, since he was not an apostle." Theologians have been writing Commentaries and Books since the beginning, and since they did not have any other way to communicate, and because it was TOO expensive and time consuming to travel, Letter Writing was the next CHOICE, and copying would have been SEVERELY limited too, because paper or parchment was VERY EXPENSIVE TOO. So passing on a letter from an obvious theologian, (look at how Paul praised his work), would have been the cheapest way to share the writings of a respected theologian. Paul was nearing the END of his Ministry, and training theologians to carry on the work of the Ministry when He was GONE. I believe that is exactly why Epaphra is even mentioned and praised.

As for your theory that Revelation is a "Stand Alone" book. We will just have to agree to disagree on that one. Because, I ABSOLUTELY believe GOD inspired Every Word from Gen. 1:1 through the final AMEN of Rev. 22:1. THESE books are not the writings of Men but the very thoughts that GOD put in their Heads, AND GOD KNEW THEY WOULD BE COMPILED INTO A SINGLE BOOK CALLED THE HOLY BIBLE or the WORD OF GOD.

2 Timothy 3:16-17 (HCSB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness,
[SUP]17 [/SUP] so that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

2 Peter 1:19-21 (HCSB)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] So we have the prophetic word strongly confirmed. You will do well to pay attention to it, as to a lamp shining in a dismal place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
[SUP]20 [/SUP] First of all, you should know this: No prophecy of Scripture comes from one’s own interpretation,
[SUP]21 [/SUP] because no prophecy ever came by the will of man; instead, men spoke from God as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

I also absolutely believe that the complilation of the Holy Scriptures was Under the Direction of the HOLY SPIRIT. Thus the Bible in it's original manuscripts was PERFECT. And I believe the PERFECT THING mentioned in the following verse, certainly is the BIBLE.

1 Corinthians 13:8-10 (HCSB)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] Love never ends. But as for prophecies, they will come to an end; as for languages, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will come to an end.
[SUP]9 [/SUP] For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
[SUP]10 [/SUP] But when the perfect comes, the partial will come to an end.
Psalm 19:7 (HCSB)
[SUP]7 [/SUP] The instruction of the LORD is perfect, renewing one’s life; the testimony of the LORD is trustworthy, making the inexperienced wise.

Deuteronomy 32:3-4 (HCSB)
[SUP]3 [/SUP] For I will proclaim Yahweh’s name. Declare the greatness of our God!
[SUP]4 [/SUP] The Rock—His work is perfect; all His ways are entirely just. A faithful God, without prejudice, He is righteous and true.

AND the Scriptures ARE NOT SILENT as to what Letters or manuscripts are to be added to the Cannon. Here is why the Apocrypha Books were REJECTED.

Mark 16:20 (HCSB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] And they went out and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them and confirming the word by the accompanying signs.

The NEW WORDS from GOD were ALWAYS confirmed by the Apostles or Prophets, doing miracles. Remember Satan loves to immitate GOD to decieve:

2 Thessalonians 2:9 (HCSB)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] The coming ⌊of the lawless one⌋ is based on Satan’s working, with all kinds of false miracles, signs, and wonders,

No verifiable miracles, by a Prophet of GOD or Apostle, and the writing are not part of GOD's Word, and are only the writings of theologians.
I haven't heard that approach before... Which list of books did they confirm, which versions of those books?... When do the lists of confirmed books start appearing?
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#98
How does a Mormon attain to eternal life? How does a Mormon receive forgiveness of their sins?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Just like the rest of us do - by accepting Jesus Christ as the one and only Son of God sacrificed for their sins. Anyone who does that, openly and honestly in the heart, is saved... no matter what label you put on their surrounding theology.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,979
4,602
113
#99
I haven't heard that approach before... Which list of books did they confirm, which versions of those books?... When do the lists of confirmed books start appearing?
It is not the Books themselves that are being CONFIRMED, but that the Author has been chosen by GOD to speak what GOD has inspired him to speak. Some times it was the Authors themselves that did the miracles from GOD. However in the OT it was more likely the Official Prophet of Israel that did the miracles to confirm the writings of the Author, such as happened with David.

That is why it says:

1 Corinthians 1:22-23 (HCSB)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] For the Jews ask for signs and the Greeks seek wisdom,
[SUP]23 [/SUP] but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to the Jews and foolishness to the Gentiles.

Jews KNEW the one claiming to be speaking for GOD would be confirmed with miraculous signs. They also knew these signs came from one that was already confirmed to be a genuine BELIEVER in the GOD of Israel. The Greeks remind me of a lot of unbelievers in this day and age, "Prove it to me in a debate, and then I will believe."

So it was not like the Apostles had to do a miracle with each new verse or page he wrote, JUST, prove they spoke from GOD with a genuine miracle one time was sufficient, and they knew they could trust his teachings from that point on. That was the PURPOSE for the sign gifts, to validate they spoke from GOD. And when that purpose was fulfilled those sign gifts ceased.

NO the modern day charismatic sign gifts are NOT the genuine gift that the Jews would consider to be from GOD. When the Apostles, spoke in TONGUES, all of the Jews present, from several different Countries, heard every word in their own Dialektos. That is their native tongue so perfect that even the dialect and accent was perfect. Anything less and the Jews would have figured it was a trick from Satan, imitating God's miracles, like when Pharoah's Magicians turned their staffs to snakes.

Acts 11:15 (NASB)
[SUP]15 [/SUP] "And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them just as He did upon us at the beginning.

That means the tongue of Fire had to be there, the mighty rushing of wind had to be there, AND they had to hear in their own native dialect, as Cornelius and his family proclaimed the mighty works of GOD; OR, the Jews would consider it a Satanic counterfeit.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Just like the rest of us do - by accepting Jesus Christ as the one and only Son of God sacrificed for their sins. Anyone who does that, openly and honestly in the heart, is saved... no matter what label you put on their surrounding theology.
OK are you saying that because you know their doctrine or are you just guessing? I'm not certain that they accept the Only Son of God and not a Son of God. Do Mormons espouse Jesus as Jehovah God incarnate? I just want to be certain we are using the same values for our terminology.

For the cause of Christ
Roger