Mouldy Mary ?
- Thread starter wincam
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Christ had the same flesh as the rest of humanity. Otherwise his ministry and sacrifice would have been pointless. He was tempted in every way that we are but did not sin. His purpose was to fulfill the Law which he did in every way. The teaching that Mary was born without original sin is a gross error. If she was without original sin her flesh would not be
like ours and neither would Christs. In that case he would not have been able to die on our behalf. In Luke Mary calls God her saviour. Only sinners need a savior so she considered herself to be a sinner like everyone else. There is no scriptural evidence that Mary didn't die. Her tomb is said to be in Ephesus. It was only in 1953 that this belief became official Catholic doctrine. The fact that it took that long to decide to make it official should give anyone pause for thought. Your view of the communion bread is based on the idea that it is the actual body of Christ and not a symbolic representation Christ used many symbols to represent himself. Johns gospel is full of them. If we follow the logic regarding communion bread we may as well treat Grape Vines, Doors and lights in the same way.
like ours and neither would Christs. In that case he would not have been able to die on our behalf. In Luke Mary calls God her saviour. Only sinners need a savior so she considered herself to be a sinner like everyone else. There is no scriptural evidence that Mary didn't die. Her tomb is said to be in Ephesus. It was only in 1953 that this belief became official Catholic doctrine. The fact that it took that long to decide to make it official should give anyone pause for thought. Your view of the communion bread is based on the idea that it is the actual body of Christ and not a symbolic representation Christ used many symbols to represent himself. Johns gospel is full of them. If we follow the logic regarding communion bread we may as well treat Grape Vines, Doors and lights in the same way.
Last edited:
T
I choose to believe that she's dead, because it's true. Just because it doesn't say in the bible, doesn't mean that she's still alive. She would be a shriveled up 4,000 year old hag by now if she were still alive.. LOL.. Stop being silly and come on home now.. 
There is no presuming, that is if the Bible was any kind of authority to a Catholic .But to them it has no authority for seeking the approval of God . According to what they call apostolic succession they must seek the approval of men.That kind of foundation of putting ones personal faith in sinful men is the recipe for the antichrists.
And there is no such thing in Christianity as a Pope or what the scriptures refers to as a daysman.
And there is no such thing in Christianity as a Pope or what the scriptures refers to as a daysman.
Protestants are required by the "Holy Spirit " that lives in them eternally to trust the Spirit of Christ,the anointing Holy Spirit of God who wrote the scriptures. Not giving His authority over to the flesh of men who walk after the experiences in life (walking by sight) and therefore refuse to walk by faith (the unseen) .
Bottom line as usual is the Catholics are forbidden from seeking his approval of God according to as it is written. They hate sola scriptura.(all things written in the law and the prophets) The Catholics nemesis . It exposes their fleshly methodology showing others they do not walk by the faith of God but rather must put their own personal faith in the flesh of men.as a law of the fathers.That they must call apostolic succession.
Catholics as a must in respect to the law of the fathers (apostolic sucession) glory in the flesh as there foundation . This is even though Christ said of his own flesh , typified as sinful it could never profit.
Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing:(nada ,zip, vain) the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
Mary's what you called mouldy body of flesh aged in a process of decay leading towards death just as the Son of man .There is no difference its where the Son of man inherited His corrupted flesh, from His mother.
Corrupted or again what you call mouldy flesh typified as sinful was needed, and God supplied it. God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.
There was no other way, it took sinful corrupted (mouldy) flesh to perform His goal.
It’s His Spirit that gives life, it quickens one soul. No such thing as Devine flesh and blood as if flesh and blood could enter the kingdom of god .That kind of ideology that promotes the flesh comes from another gospel, another christ.
But any way here you go Wincam start denying the authority of scripture.
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after “the flesh”, but after “the Spirit”. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: Rom 8:1-3
Can you see that there above he needed what you call mouldy flesh in order to condemn sin in the flesh and without it he could not?
It would seem the context that you must ignore in order exult/venerate the flesh rather than walking by faith (the unseen) continues . Will you continue to ignore its authority?
That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk “not after the flesh”, but after the “Spirit”.For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the “Spirit of God” dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. Rom 8:49
Did our blessed, by the great mercy and therefore grace of God, sister in the Lord, Mary....... have the Spirit of Christ? if not the scriptures says she would not belong to Him? Yes or no?
Bottom line as usual is the Catholics are forbidden from seeking his approval of God according to as it is written. They hate sola scriptura.(all things written in the law and the prophets) The Catholics nemesis . It exposes their fleshly methodology showing others they do not walk by the faith of God but rather must put their own personal faith in the flesh of men.as a law of the fathers.That they must call apostolic succession.
Catholics as a must in respect to the law of the fathers (apostolic sucession) glory in the flesh as there foundation . This is even though Christ said of his own flesh , typified as sinful it could never profit.
Joh 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing:(nada ,zip, vain) the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
Mary's what you called mouldy body of flesh aged in a process of decay leading towards death just as the Son of man .There is no difference its where the Son of man inherited His corrupted flesh, from His mother.
Corrupted or again what you call mouldy flesh typified as sinful was needed, and God supplied it. God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.
There was no other way, it took sinful corrupted (mouldy) flesh to perform His goal.
It’s His Spirit that gives life, it quickens one soul. No such thing as Devine flesh and blood as if flesh and blood could enter the kingdom of god .That kind of ideology that promotes the flesh comes from another gospel, another christ.
But any way here you go Wincam start denying the authority of scripture.
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after “the flesh”, but after “the Spirit”. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: Rom 8:1-3
Can you see that there above he needed what you call mouldy flesh in order to condemn sin in the flesh and without it he could not?
It would seem the context that you must ignore in order exult/venerate the flesh rather than walking by faith (the unseen) continues . Will you continue to ignore its authority?
That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk “not after the flesh”, but after the “Spirit”.For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit. For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the “Spirit of God” dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. Rom 8:49
Did our blessed, by the great mercy and therefore grace of God, sister in the Lord, Mary....... have the Spirit of Christ? if not the scriptures says she would not belong to Him? Yes or no?
Show us where in the Scriptures does God say Mary was our Manna wincam. God does not say it. Its Satan who says Mary was your Manna, not God.
Where in the Scriptures wincam did God ever say Mary never died, that MARY was assumed into Heaven?
It was in 1950 when the Pope of the False Catholic Church proclaimed that Mary never died and was assumed into Heaven. Why did it take over 1900 years for the Catholics to start teaching this?
I tell you why. Its because in 1854 is when the False Catholic Church walked away from God to serve and Worship Mary as their one and only God.
Where in the Scriptures wincam did God ever say Mary never died, that MARY was assumed into Heaven?
It was in 1950 when the Pope of the False Catholic Church proclaimed that Mary never died and was assumed into Heaven. Why did it take over 1900 years for the Catholics to start teaching this?
I tell you why. Its because in 1854 is when the False Catholic Church walked away from God to serve and Worship Mary as their one and only God.
Ive only ever been to a Catholic church service once in my entire life (I went with a friend in Christ), but I remember being surprised by what I saw. There was only one image of Christ, it was a small cross with Christ hanging from it, less than a foot tall. Other than that there were many images of what the Catholic church calls the saints, and a very large statue of Mary. During the service they mentioned Mary, the saints, even talked about praying to the angels, and called the pope "our heavenly father".
I do not remember them even once mentioning Jesus the entire time. It was the weirdest thing I had ever witnessed. For a group that identifies themselves as Christian, they really dont feel like Christians.
I do not remember them even once mentioning Jesus the entire time. It was the weirdest thing I had ever witnessed. For a group that identifies themselves as Christian, they really dont feel like Christians.
I agree the Catholics are messed up in who they worship.........HOWEVER.........
just to be clear
NONE OF THIS IS MARY'S FAULT!
Nowhere in Scripture will people find Mary telling folks to worship her, pray to her, or construct statues of her. Very little is even recorded about Mary in Scripture. What we do know is she was very supportive of Christ, and humbled herself towards Christ...........other than that...........
So, just to be clear...........none of this junk the Catholics come up with about Mary, or any of the Apostles, is their FAULT!
just to be clear
NONE OF THIS IS MARY'S FAULT!
Nowhere in Scripture will people find Mary telling folks to worship her, pray to her, or construct statues of her. Very little is even recorded about Mary in Scripture. What we do know is she was very supportive of Christ, and humbled herself towards Christ...........other than that...........
So, just to be clear...........none of this junk the Catholics come up with about Mary, or any of the Apostles, is their FAULT!
Yes I have those mixed feelings as well. I feel burdened to evangelize both Catholics and Jehovah Witnesses. I have friends and family members that are stuck there . I try to engage them on their beliefs and official doctrine. The problem is the internet is limited in what we can do . We can pray vigorously and point them in a good direction. Sadly that's about it.
Also in support of his being banned the moderators have a job to do . They have to balance the fact that we are to help those who need to be shown the true Gospell with the duty of protecting the new in Christ from their false doctrine.
Blessings
your brother in Christ
Bill
Also in support of his being banned the moderators have a job to do . They have to balance the fact that we are to help those who need to be shown the true Gospell with the duty of protecting the new in Christ from their false doctrine.
Blessings
your brother in Christ
Bill