Paul - ignore his teachings?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#41
As it is written in the NT, it could be infered, that in Paul lifetime, he also saw many (or several) people who had issues against his teachings:


1Co 1:12 What I mean is that each one of you says, "I follow Paul," or "I follow Apollos," or "I follow Cephas," or "I follow Christ."


1Co 1:13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?


1Co 3:4 For when one says, "I follow Paul," and another, "I follow Apollos," are you not being merely human?

1Co 3:5 What then is Apollos? What is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, as the Lord assigned to each.
1Co 3:6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.

by the way, where is "the Gospel" of Apollos? :confused:

A teacher that wrote nothing? :confused:
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#42
@ Elin

Chances are the "original flock" lost her rights:


Mat 21:41 They said to him, "He will put those wretches to a miserable death and let out the vineyard to other tenants who will give him the fruits in their seasons."


Mar 12:9 Jesus asked, "What do you think the owner of the vineyard will do? He will come and kill those renters and let someone else have his vineyard.

Although I see it Jewish.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#43
We all learn much from Paul.

Unfortunately, there are many who ignore Jesus Christ's teachings because of misunderstanding Paul's writings.

Paul, himself, warns these people who "belong to Paul" that Paul did not die on the cross for our sins. We who are saved by the gospel of Jesus Christ are taught of God. Jesus Christ is God, and He invites all to learn of Him for His yoke is easy and His burden is light. People gloss over this in favor of misunderstanding something from Paul's writings.

I say misunderstanding because Paul agrees completely with Jesus Christ, therfore if Paul sounds to be teaching something new on a given subject which our Lord teaches, it is clearly misunderstood.

There are many reasons to always learn the gospel from the One Who was born, lived and died horribly in order to deliver it to all mankind. Paul's teachings are valid, but never when they have been misconstrued and defy the teachings of the Master, Jesus Christ, for He is our Teacher (Maset.)

Blessed be Jesus Christ always. Learn of God, for it is your privilege, amen.
"Defy the teachings of Christ" is in the eye of the beholder, not in the teachings of Christ.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#44
I've always been of the understanding that Paul was speaking of someone other than himself. Perhaps John, who wrote revelations?
Paul was given Satan to buffet him because of his great revelations, not because of John's great revelations.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#45
As it is written in the NT, it could be infered, that in Paul lifetime, he also saw many (or several) people who had issues against his teachings:


1Co 1:12 What I mean is that each one of you says, "I follow Paul," or "I follow Apollos," or "I follow Cephas," or "I follow Christ."


1Co 1:13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?


1Co 3:4 For when one says, "I follow Paul," and another, "I follow Apollos," are you not being merely human?

1Co 3:5 What then is Apollos? What is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, as the Lord assigned to each.
1Co 3:6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.

by the way, where is "the Gospel" of Apollos? :confused:

A teacher that wrote nothing? :confused:
Did not all the apostles teach?

Did all "write something?
 
L

Least

Guest
#47
Paul was given Satan to buffet him because of his great revelations, not because of John's great revelations.
That's not the conflict Elin, He speaks of his own revelations and his infirmities not only in ch. 12, but also in the previous chapter, and then in ch. 12, he speaks of someone else of whom he will boast, (not himself.)

2 Corinthians 12:3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;
2 Corinthians 12:4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.

2 Corinthians 12:5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in mine infirmities.

Nobody is saying that Paul didn't have manifold revelations, but reading that passage as it is written, that is exactly what it says.

I stated it as a question of whom Paul was referring to...not as a given....
I've always been of the understanding that Paul was speaking of someone other than himself. Perhaps John, who wrote revelations?
 
P

phil112

Guest
#48
Paul was given Satan to buffet him because of his great revelations, not because of John's great revelations.
That's an assumption the bible doesn't support. It could have been a physical infirmity. You don't, nor does anyone else, knows what that thorn was.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#49
That's not the conflict Elin, He speaks of his own revelations and his infirmities not only in ch. 12, but also in the previous chapter, and then in ch. 12, he speaks of someone else of whom he will boast, (not himself.)

2 Corinthians 12:3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;
2 Corinthians 12:4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.

2 Corinthians 12:5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in mine infirmities.

Nobody is saying that Paul didn't have manifold revelations, but reading that passage as it is written, that is exactly what it says.

I stated it as a question of whom Paul was referring to...not as a given....
Yeah I agree I believe he is speaking of John too

2 Corinthians 12:3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;

2 Corinthians 12:4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.

Rev 10:3 And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write:

and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me,
Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#50
That's not the conflict Elin,
He speaks of his own revelations and his infirmities not only in ch. 12, but also
in the previous chapter, and then
in ch. 12, he speaks of someone else of whom he will boast, (not himself.)
However, Paul does not mention his revelations in chp 11, only his sufferings.

Only in chp 12 are his revelations mentioned, as a continuation of boasting (speaking as a fool in boasting what the others boast about, 11:21), and for which revelations he was given a messenger of Satan "to keep him from becoming conceited because of these surpassingly great revelations" (12:7).
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#51
I believe they both had visions and revelations, but I have always been of the mind that Paul is including John in on the same, at least the picture with that man shows that John heard words and was told not to write them (being unlawful for him to utter).
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#52
That's an assumption the bible doesn't support. It could have been a physical infirmity. You don't, nor does anyone else, knows what that thorn was.
My mistake. . .I meant to say "a messenger of Satan" to buffet him.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#53
There is what is called a spirit of infirmity though, you could both be right no?

EDIT (which is also from Satan) as would be a thorn in the flesh (messenger) in the same way called a "temptation in the flesh" (like Job recieved through boils on his flesh/skin)
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#55
However, Paul does not mention his revelations in chp 11, only his sufferings.

Only in chp 12 are his revelations mentioned, as a continuation of boasting (speaking as a fool in boasting what the others boast about, 11:21), and for which revelations he was given a messenger of Satan "to keep him from becoming conceited because of these surpassingly great revelations" (12:7).

Thanks God he said nothing of them!

What else could have been introduced as teaching?

(I´m not defying, just my thoughts said)
 
L

Least

Guest
#56
There is what is called a spirit of infirmity though, you could both be right no?

EDIT (which is also from Satan) as would be a thorn in the flesh (messenger) in the same way called a "temptation in the flesh" (like Job recieved through boils on his flesh/skin)
Good point DesiredHaven!

Looking at other passages that mention, "thorns,"

Numbers 33:55 But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.

Ezekiel 28:24 And there shall be no more a pricking brier unto the house of Israel, nor any grieving thorn of all that are round about them, that despised them; and they shall know that I am the Lord GOD.

Micah 7:3 That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.
Micah 7:4 The best of them is as a brier: the most upright is sharper than a thorn hedge: the day of thy watchmen and thy visitation cometh; now shall be their perplexity.

There are several verses that mention, "thorns." Thank you for pointing that out.

Spending some time tonight reading through the different passages. :)
 
P

psychomom

Guest
#57
then we have things like this:

On the very night when Herod was about to bring him forward, Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains, and guards in front of the door were watching over the prison.

And behold, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared and a light shone in the cell; and he struck Peter’s side and woke him up, saying, “Get up quickly.” And his chains fell off his hands.
And the angel said to him, “Gird yourself and put on your sandals.” And he did so. And he said to him, “Wrap your cloak around you and follow me.”
And he went out and continued to follow, and he did not know that what was being done by the angel was real, but thought he was seeing a vision. (Acts 12:6-9)

i know Peter 'came to himself'....just wondering how we'd feel if half the stuff that happened
to the Apostles happened to us? :)
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#58
Good point DesiredHaven!

Looking at other passages that mention, "thorns,"

Numbers 33:55 But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.

Ezekiel 28:24 And there shall be no more a pricking brier unto the house of Israel, nor any grieving thorn of all that are round about them, that despised them; and they shall know that I am the Lord GOD.

Micah 7:3 That they may do evil with both hands earnestly, the prince asketh, and the judge asketh for a reward; and the great man, he uttereth his mischievous desire: so they wrap it up.
Micah 7:4 The best of them is as a brier: the most upright is sharper than a thorn hedge: the day of thy watchmen and thy visitation cometh; now shall be their perplexity.

There are several verses that mention, "thorns." Thank you for pointing that out.

Spending some time tonight reading through the different passages. :)
I cannot say for sure, in the sense that we ourselves can bring forth thorns (not being fruitful) in that sense, then we have the picture of people (likewise) being the same ( even as you show it) . Then what we see as given to Paul (a thorn in) the flesh (as if unrelated to either or) but is still referred to as a messenger of Satan right? So even if we might say, wait a second Paul also spake of an inifimity (in his flesh) of some kind (but is somewhat unclear) we have that also which was by Satan in the woman who had a spirit of inifirmity (in her flesh) which could also be understood to be a messenger of Satan in that regard as something sent and by Him (but which is also inclusive of an infirmity of the flesh) of some kind. In her case Jesus says its a spirit of inifirmity (although she is still a daughter of Abraham) before Jesus looses her from this thing (which thing was not removed from Paul) These seem to keep them unable to "lift themselves up" in either case (phyisically or spiritually so). But then we have what Paul calls the "temptation in his flesh" see how that is worded? But things of all three it seems as if they can be of one thing looking at all the examples given us. First called , a messenger of Satan (so it is sent) of Satan (so permitted, as it was in Jobs case). Second, we have an infirmity (which Paul says he had) then look at the spirit of inifirmity and that brings in the messenger of this thing (something sent, into the flesh) by another. Just as Satan was allowed to touch Jobs flesh (with his expressed intention to tempt Job) thus a temptation in Jobs flesh (in that way, as I am seeing it). Whether he touches flesh and bone or flesh or bone. Like the woman bent over, with a bad back, being unable to lift herself up (for 18 years). Her bone would seem more like that which was touched (and herself bound by Satan there) by a spirit of infirmity (in just that thing).

But back to Job the temptation (as sent into Jobs flesh) comes by the mouth of Satan (towards you) God-ward that if Job's flesh (and/or bone) were touched that he would what by it? Curse God to his face (the temptation in his flesh then). The more I look at it the more I received and it seems to be speaking of these in combination. See how all three pictures combine together to show a bigger thing (together)?

I just caught the fact the his wife (who is Jobs flesh and bone also) was whispering the same thing in his ear Satan desired of Him when she said, hold fast to thine integrity? Curse God and die! And so I have been puring through various verses where you can somewhat see how his own wife was taken captive at his will (in this situation) which is the snare of the devil in this. He seems to go after the wives in these things to snag the men huh?

Anyway, I had thought of those verse on one level many years ago, but I wasnt getting it to mesh together and the other places where really unifying for me and now I sort of see these coming together much differently, and you always know your on the right path as everything begins to interlock and fold in together and contradictions fade and bigger pictures emmerge (and all of that). Now I am really bad at articuling things into my own words (and sort of hate to do that) I feel the scriptures are more precise, and I have these in just scripts alone, but they are a tad hard to follow if you dont see them as putting them together as one thing.

But thats where I am at with this, but we all have to be persuaded for ourselves, and we labor to be that I think, and thats where I was headed (in a nutshell).

God bless you
 
May 3, 2013
8,719
75
0
#59
@ Desired heaven

"...Is there a way to turn off receiving friend requests so I can un-bother myself with the one thing without turning off my PM's?..."

Hmmm!
:confused:
"I will be unsubscribed."
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#60
@ Desired heaven

"...Is there a way to turn off receiving friend requests so I can un-bother myself with the one thing without turning off my PM's?..."

Hmmm!
:confused:
"I will be unsubscribed."
Secularhermit, what exactly did you not understand in what I posted on that thread?

What is your "hmmmmm" for?

You posted it "as if" its some secret thing when I posted that openly and not in secret

I am not interested in playing games with you anymore than I am in receiving pretentious cyber requests for virtual pal-hood, so I decided to ignore the requests if received. That will work fine for me.

Your reason for not contacting me by PM?