"replacement theology" - what is it?

[plainguy]

Joshua 21:43-45

43 So the Lord gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give their ancestors, and they took possession of it and settled there. 44 The Lord gave them rest on every side, just as He had sworn to their ancestors. Not one of their enemies withstood them; the Lord gave all their enemies into their hands. 45 Not one of all the Lord’s good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled.

 

[KJV1611]

Geneva Study Bible
Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the {a} fruits thereof.

(a) They bring forth the fruits of the kingdom of God, who bring forth the fruit of the Spirit, and not of the flesh, Ga 5:16-26.

This is pretty simple stuff isn't it. A person has to do some severe twisting of the word to make those people in Israel right now legitimate. Pray for them, only God can heal the blind... as you are a witness to my healing, it can happen.

 

[kaylagrl]

This is pretty simple stuff isn't it. A person has to do some severe twisting of the word to make those people in Israel right now legitimate. Pray for them, only God can heal the blind... as you are a witness to my healing, it can happen.

Replacement
theology is the blind leading the blind.

 

[KJV1611]

Quote"The British found themselves in a mess they couldn't resolve and turned it over to the U.N."

No, this is not true.Please read what I posted,skim it if its too long. The League of Nations,all the countries under it,signed for the creation of Israel. The UNs job was only to uphold what the League of Nations had already created,already signed and agreed to.The UN has no right to change that original agreement.

Why is the league of Nations any better than the UN? The league was just the first attempt at suckering the world into a Jewish New World Order.

 

[KJV1611]

Replacement
theology is the blind leading the blind.

There is no such thing as replacement theology. The children of the flesh ARE NOT the children of God. Nobody has ever replaced anybody.

 

[KJV1611]

Joshua 21:43-45

43 So the Lord gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give their ancestors, and they took possession of it and settled there. 44 The Lord gave them rest on every side, just as He had sworn to their ancestors. Not one of their enemies withstood them; the Lord gave all their enemies into their hands. 45 Not one of all the Lord’s good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled.

And that promise was valid throughout the Old Tesatment. If Israel would follow God and keep his commandments then they could stay in the land, but if they couldn't, God drove them out.

 

[kaylagrl]

Why is the league of Nations any better than the UN? The league was just the first attempt at suckering the world into a Jewish New World Order.

Its not a matter of better,it was first. And according to international law the UN was to uphold what the League of Nations signed and agreed to.


Quote "suckering the world into a Jewish New World Order"

Careful,your slip is showing.

 

[kaylagrl]

There is no such thing as replacement theology. The children of the flesh ARE NOT the children of God. Nobody has ever replaced anybody.

The promises of the Jews are now the churches,correct? I dont care if you call it "hanging out the laundry" its wrong.Your theology is false.

 

[plainguy]

Quote"The British found themselves in a mess they couldn't resolve and turned it over to the U.N."

No, this is not true.Please read what I posted,skim it if its too long. The League of Nations,all the countries under it,signed for the creation of Israel. The UNs job was only to uphold what the League of Nations had already created,already signed and agreed to.The UN has no right to change that original agreement.

That's pretty much what I've said ... and yes, the British did in fact have conflicts in the region early on with the occupying Zionist forces. The U.N. replaced the League ... encompassing more countries (including the U.S.) as well as establishing a unified military deterrent/presence of it's member nations. It changes nothing of what I said.


Following World War II, Britain continued to limit Jewish immigration to Palestine. The Zionist factions united and conducted an underground war against the British, as well as applying pressure on the British government through the United States. In June of 1947, the British rammed the Jewish illegal immigrant ship Exodus (formerly "President Warfield") on the high seas. They towed it to Haifa where it was the subject of extensive publicity, generating public sympathy for the Zionist cause. The passengers were eventually disembarked in Hamburg. The incident set world opinion, and particularly US opinion against the British, and caused the British to intern illegal immigrants thereafter in Cyprus, rather than attempting to return them to Europe.

http://www.zionismontheweb.org/zionism_history.htm

 

[KJV1611]

The promises of the Jews are now the churches,correct? I dont care if you call it "hanging out the laundry" its wrong.Your theology is false.

Kayla the promises were made to the children of promise. Do you not realize that Abraham was the father of many nations? He has 3 sets of kids and only one set of kids are the chosen people.

 

[zone]

And that promise was valid throughout the Old Tesatment. If Israel would follow God and keep his commandments then they could stay in the land, but if they couldn't, God drove them out.

...until He brought them back again out of Babylon, in time for the Messiah.
after they rejected Him and called for His death, the events leading to 70AD were initiated and fulfilled.

 

[kaylagrl]

That's pretty much what I've said ... and yes, the British did in fact have conflicts in the region early on with the occupying Zionist forces. The U.N. replaced the League ... encompassing more countries (including the U.S.) as well as establishing a unified military deterrent/presence of it's member nations. It changes nothing of what I said.


Following World War II, Britain continued to limit Jewish immigration to Palestine. The Zionist factions united and conducted an underground war against the British, as well as applying pressure on the British government through the United States. In June of 1947, the British rammed the Jewish illegal immigrant ship Exodus (formerly "President Warfield") on the high seas. They towed it to Haifa where it was the subject of extensive publicity, generating public sympathy for the Zionist cause. The passengers were eventually disembarked in Hamburg. The incident set world opinion, and particularly US opinion against the British, and caused the British to intern illegal immigrants thereafter in Cyprus, rather than attempting to return them to Europe.

http://www.zionismontheweb.org/zionism_history.htm

Yes,when the League of Nations became defunct the UN became the upholder of what the League of Nations signed. If you agree why are you bringing it up. Conflict over the issue doesn't matter,the UNs job is to uphold the LofNs agreement.

 

[zone]

Joshua 21:43-45

[FONT=&]43 So the Lord gave Israel all the land He had sworn to give their ancestors, and they took possession of it and settled there. 44 The Lord gave them rest on every side, just as He had sworn to their ancestors. Not one of their enemies withstood them; the Lord gave all their enemies into their hands. 45 Not one of all the Lord’s good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled.[/FONT]

will they believe our report?

"Not one of all the Lord’s good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled"

 

[KJV1611]

...until He brought them back again out of Babylon, in time for the Messiah.
after they rejected Him and called for His death, the events leading to 70AD were initiated and fulfilled.

I agree with that. I think that priviledge to try and keep the law to stay in the law is not an option after Christ.

 

[kaylagrl]

...until He brought them back again out of Babylon, in time for the Messiah.
after they rejected Him and called for His death, the events leading to 70AD were initiated and fulfilled.

No!Prophesy
has not all been fulfilled,theres another false doctrine.smh

 

[zone]

This is pretty simple stuff isn't it. A person has to do some severe twisting of the word to make those people in Israel right now legitimate. Pray for them, only God can heal the blind... as you are a witness to my healing, it can happen.

yes KJV I am a witness - very cool.
just goes to show, have broad shoulders....it takes time.

 

[plainguy]

The promises of the Jews are now the churches,correct? I dont care if you call it "hanging out the laundry" its wrong.Your theology is false.

The promise to the Jews is the same promise given to all of us today ... and fulfilled entirely in our Lord Jesus Christ ... whose Kingdom is not of this world.

 

[zone]

Kayla the promises were made to the children of promise. Do you not realize that Abraham was the father of many nations? He has 3 sets of kids and only one set of kids are the chosen people.

question: if one doesn't believe they are children of the promise - are they children of the promise?

 

[KJV1611]

question: if one doesn't believe they are children of the promise - are they children of the promise?

Yes they are and the only reason I say that is because I was one of them and I whole heartedly know that I was saved during that time.

 

[zone]

I agree with that. I think that priviledge to try and keep the law to stay in the law is not an option after Christ.

the sacrificial system where sins were only covered until Messiah paid the price was never meant to carry over past the brief period where both covenants overlapped between 30AD and 70AD