Skycentrism: We live inside the Earth! Introduction and History

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 22, 2013
93
0
0
#1
Introduction: Skycentrism: We live inside the Earth, Introduction (English subtitles, napisy ENG) - YouTube
part I - History Skycentrism: We live inside the Earth, part I - History (English subtitles, napisy ENG) - YouTube



This subject derives from a Polish site. With more than 60000 views it's one of the most popular on one of the biblical forums.

It is as unbelieveable as it sounds. But it's true.

The subject is amazing and many will mock it or simply not believe it.
There are no proofs that we live on the globe/outer surface.
It is surely controversial but there is a lot of evidence you can not
ignore. This short film is an introduction to the subject. All the
things mentioned will be developed in the next parts
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
#2
It's amazing what people will believe.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#3
This is how I learned it many decades ago: Hollow Earth Theory - A Thorough Explaination
Here's a little review; Hollow Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The latest new book. Check the links, it's Mormon. World Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow!: Welcome
The proof that it is wrong is that all of geometry changes. The error would show up every time a ship or airplane navigates. The idea is a byproduct of a special type of geometric transformation. Also, I think it is hilarious that the video needs English subtiltes, but the map has English titles.

The evidence works because the theory was developed by Leonard Euler, as an alternative to the multiple heaven theory (Paul and the third neaven), who was one of the most prolific mathematicians of all time. It is a simple transformation of the complex plane z goes to 1/z.
 
Aug 22, 2013
93
0
0
#4
The Earth is hollow but we live inside. Next part will cover geodesy which is a grounbreaking proof. There are also other issues like horizon and how far we would see if the Earth was convex. The horizon matter will include the author's own research and experiments. I think it's the first such elaboration on this subject in the world. Be patient :)
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#5
It's true that it's unbelievable. I'll agree with that. The failed hypothesis has been dismissed since at least the 18th century after being proved wrong by both observational evidence and non-observational science. The structure of the earth has included seismic wave studies, for example, that were able to show the earth's interior is made up of layers of molten rock and various elements, in the mantle and core with astronomical planet formation observations confirming this.

But, the concept still recurs in folklore, science fiction and adventure fiction, and a few far-flung conspiracy theories. The one that asserts Hitler is living in the center of the earth preparing for his final assault seems to be one of the more popular ones. Lolol.



The Interior of the Earth
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#6
Why are you encouraging him. This is his first post. He's here to troll.

You should already know the intensity and structure of the Earth's magnetic field are always changing, slowly but erratically, reflecting the influence of the flow of thermal currents within the iron core.

This variation is reflected in part by the wandering of the North and South Geomagnetic Poles. Because a wide range of commercial and military navigation and attitude/heading systems are dependent on models of the magnetic field, these models need to be updated periodically. The magnetic field's strength and direction and their rates of change are predicted every 5 years for a 5-year period.

Inside the Earth [This Dynamic Earth, USGS]
Geomagnetism: The Magnetic Field of the Earth

Seriously, this isn't rocket science. This is geology 101.


This is how I learned it many decades ago: Hollow Earth Theory - A Thorough Explaination
Here's a little review; Hollow Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The latest new book. Check the links, it's Mormon. World Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow!: Welcome
The proof that it is wrong is that all of geometry changes. The error would show up every time a ship or airplane navigates. The idea is a byproduct of a special type of geometric transformation. Also, I think it is hilarious that the video needs English subtiltes, but the map has English titles.

The evidence works because the theory was developed by Leonard Euler, as an alternative to the multiple heaven theory (Paul and the third neaven), who was one of the most prolific mathematicians of all time. It is a simple transformation of the complex plane z goes to 1/z.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#7
I did not catch it. Sorry. But there are religious ramifications, as I pointed out. The presented video is stupid. But the mention of Mormonism in the latest book may interest some of us.
 
Aug 22, 2013
93
0
0
#8
I did not catch it. Sorry. But there are religious ramifications, as I pointed out. The presented video is stupid. But the mention of Mormonism in the latest book may interest some of us.
The first video ? Second ? Both ? Well, maybe you'll give the next parts a try as well. It'll get really interesting :)
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#9
I like you kenisyes, always have. There's just something about you that's honest and genuine in a world that is increasingly not so. Sorry if I came too strong brother. Peace.

I did not catch it. Sorry. But there are religious ramifications, as I pointed out. The presented video is stupid. But the mention of Mormonism in the latest book may interest some of us.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#10
Now you, on the other hand, we are thanking for providing the fuel with which to expose you. We'll refute your nonsense and expose you simultaneously. :)


The first video ? Second ? Both ? Well, maybe you'll give the next parts a try as well. It'll get really interesting :)
 
Aug 22, 2013
93
0
0
#11
Now you, on the other hand, we are thanking for providing the fuel with which to expose you. Keep it coming. We'll refute your nonsense and expose you at the same time. :)
You will have a tough challenge then :) For now I understand your caution. But the subject will defend itself perfectly:) Who knows maybe you will even change your mind.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#12
It's already failed so not sure how you're going to prove something that is patently false.

You will have a tough challenge then :) For now I understand your caution. But the subject will defend itself perfectly:) Who knows maybe you will even change your mind.
 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#13
I think it would help if the video did not keep saying, "We'll see this later", and actually show us some evidence now.
 
Aug 22, 2013
93
0
0
#14
I think it would help if the video did not keep saying, "We'll see this later", and actually show us some evidence now.
That's what the introduction is for. To give an outline. Everything will be perfectly explained and proved. The next part will be made and translated soon. And each part will cover ONE specific subject. You can't make a video about everything at once.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#15
LOL. Here's his "proof" lolol:

 
K

kenisyes

Guest
#16
Why not just review the articles I posted, and list the differences in your theory? Most CC threads last 2-3 days. It seems unlikely anyone is going to wait around. For all we know, the author of the videos will determine some part is not true, and such parts will never be made at all.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#18
LOLOL! I'm laughing so hard right now.