The Gross Error of Limited Atonement

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,189
113
That is not limited atonement brother.
If you add a couple words in there for clarification its close enough.

Christs death is sufficient for all, but His Blood (and the Atonement) are limited to those who believe.

In effect you could say Christ did not die for everyone because not everyone is saved but you cannot say that His Death was not sufficient for all. Right?
 

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
448
83
57
I would say that Christ’s atonement would be sufficient for all but is only only for the elect .
Blessings
Bill
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,485
12,950
113
Surely the Atonement is Sufficient to save everyone who has ever lived or will ever live. That is not the issue at hand.
Then why do Calvinists teach that Christ died ONLY for the elect? Check it out for yourself. I could refer you to a Spurgeon sermon on "Particular Atonement" and that is what he was teaching.
The fact that not all men will be saved is the proof that the Atonement is LIMITED to those who are in fact saved.
That is incorrect. Not all men will be saved because not all will obey the Gospel.
The very meaning of Atonement should tell you all this.
The meaning of "atonement" is the same as that of "propitiation" (some call this expiation). And the meaning is that a complete and satisfactory sacrifice (in God's sight) was offered up and accepted for the sins of the whole world. Thus Christ Himself -- as the Lamb of God -- is the PROPITIATION for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:1,2). But this is precisely what is denied in limited atonement, where it is taught that Christ died only for the elect.
Christ is sufficient but His Atonement doesn't apply to all, only the saved.
Which is true. But if that is what Calvinists would believe and proclaim, they would reject limited atonement. Please note regarding TULIP:

Limited Atonement
- Because God determined that certain ones should be saved as a result of God’s unconditional election, He determined that Christ should die for the elect alone. All whom God has elected and for whom Christ died will be saved (
Matthew 1:21; John 10:11; 17:9; Acts 20:28; Romans 8:32; Ephesians 5:25).
https://www.gotquestions.org/calvinism.html

Do you see how the Five Points of Calvinism are all determined by limited atonement? Therefore if this false teaching is shown to be totally unscriptural, TULIP falls apart and falls to pieces.


 
Last edited:

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,189
113
Then why do Calvinists teach that Christ died ONLY for the elect? Check it out for yourself. I could refer you to a Spurgeon sermon on "Particular Atonement" and that is what he was teaching.
Because, effectively, Christ died only for the elect. Christs Atonement is only for those who are Saved.

That is incorrect. Not all men will be saved because not all will obey the Gospel.
Not all men will obey the gospel because not all men are atoned for.

The meaning of "atonement" is the same as that of "propitiation" (some call this expiation). And the meaning is that a complete and satisfactory sacrifice (in God's sight) was offered up and accepted for the sins of the whole world. Thus Christ Himself -- as the Lamb of God -- is the PROPITIATION for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:1,2). But this is precisely what is denied in limited atonement, where it is taught that Christ died only for the elect.
If the sins of the whole world have been paid for then there is no more sin to cause anyone to go to hell.

Everyone will be in heaven because there is no more punishment that can be applied to anyone, they've been atoned for....

Which is true. But if that is what Calvinists would believe and proclaim, they would reject limited atonement. Please note regarding TULIP:

Limited Atonement
- Because God determined that certain ones should be saved as a result of God’s unconditional election, He determined that Christ should die for the elect alone. All whom God has elected and for whom Christ died will be saved (
Matthew 1:21; John 10:11; 17:9; Acts 20:28; Romans 8:32; Ephesians 5:25).
https://www.gotquestions.org/calvinism.html

Do you see how the Five Points of Calvinism are all determined by limited atonement? Therefore if this false teaching is shown to be totally unscriptural, TULIP falls apart and falls to pieces.


If the Atonement doesn't apply to everyone do you see how that would make it Limited???

And since the Atonement was limited then His Death was limited as well.

You can't separate Christs Death from the Atonement.


Is this just a game of semantics or is basic logic just not being understood here? It doesn't matter to me which one you believe but you fall into one of two categories; Either Universalism or Limited Atonement. It has to be one or the other. Either everyone is saved or not everyone is saved.
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Who came up with limited atonement? I bet the educated dummies who came up with TULIP copied it from some heretic in church history, maybe their favorite augustine? Or maybe they just came up with it on their own.

This doctrine is great proof ya cant fix stupid no matter how much edumacation ya get.
 

Johnny_B

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2017
1,954
64
48
Scholar Johnny there didnt read verse 40, ya know the verse after 39.
The guys who fall for the calvinist movement must have no street smarts at all.
"And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.”

Here it is and it says not one thing about salvation from sin, it is talk about what it says "save yourself from this crooked generation" or do you interpret crook generation to mean sin?


 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
"And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.”

Here it is and it says not one thing about salvation from sin, it is talk about what it says "save yourself from this crooked generation" or do you interpret crook generation to mean sin?


Crooked generation being the generation that killed Jesus, thats the context. But how come there is an exhortation, how come Peter tells them to do something? Peter probably didnt know about the TULIP, rookie mistake!

He shoulda said "Maybe God will save some of you from this crooked generation". Or "Maybe God will grant some of you folks repentance and faith and belief".

Yall need a new bible translation that says that. Maybe some older manuscripts will be discovered soon to make that happen. I dont like how these current ones read, cant be right that someone would make a DECISION to get saved or God forbid receive Christ or repent. We all know thats works salvation, and its not of works remember.
Chances are Christ didnt even die for your sins specifically, its luck of the draw.

Grace lottery

 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Those who deny Christ are already condemned, so free will is the option to make the right decision not the wrong one. If you're hanging off a cliff you're eventually going to die, its inevitable (you'll run out of strength), but if someone extends their hand to save you (think Jesus), you can with your free will choose to be saved. You really aren't choosing to die if you don't accept salvation (in the analogy), you're simply accepting your inevitable demise.

This means that salvation isn't an ultimatum of choice, but circumstance. It isn't "choose me or die", its "you're dying, choose me." So then we go to the Gospel, Jesus is the propitiation for the sins of the world.

1 John 2:2 King James Version (KJV)

2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.

If He is the propitiation for our sins, believers, and "not for ours only", then who else? "For the sins of the whole world", and if that be the case, and it is (according to scripture), then there is a means of applying that propitiation. God's desire is for all to be saved. However, what does scripture say?


John 3:17-19 King James Version (KJV)

17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.


Notice, "he hath not believed" which lays responsibility upon the world to believe in Christ, in order for Him to be their propitiation. In order for them to "turn in the check", as it were. This means that salvation is for all, but not all shall be saved. Just like oxygen is for all, but a man under water drowning cannot breath. He can't even swim, he needs a lifeguard. Jesus is the lifeguard in this analogy, He saves the man giving him oxygen, giving him life. The man has no power to save himself, his demise is inevitable, yet a lifeguard comes and if the man surrenders his will into the hands of his savior, he may live.

Jesus is the savior of the world, and the world may be saved if only they believe.

If a person does not follow a matter to the end ,he can easily work to make up his own conclusions.

Rom 9:11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth

As always God not seen, our first love must do the first works freely giving a person a new incorruptible spirit. It’s the only reason we can love Him as a choice he makes.. When we fall from that love we must do the first works that he works in us , believe God.

Free will is to do the will of our Father in heaven not seen (the law of faith). It resists coming to a upside down conclusion so that a person can feel good about themselves..

Romans 3:27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

It’s the kind of food the disciples knew not of. Free will is power of God working in us to do his good pleasure (imputed righteousness)as it does work in the person. Not from or of the person. We have that treasure in these earthen bodies of death but are never to assume it could be of us . For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

If a person has a boastful heart they have received the treasure of their reward.

2Corinthians 4:7 But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.

To do the pleasure of the will fathers in of lies in respect to that seen (the serpent)It brought bondage to sin.

God did not desire that men learn by experience, it brought death and separation from God called walking by faith, walking, understanding after experiences .

1John 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.


Suppose a person fall into a raging river which current is impossible for any man to navigate and God unseen recuses him by stooping the current only to be thrown back in.Would that not make an evil merciless, God?

That the waters which came down from above stood and rose up upon an heap very far from the city Adam, that is beside Zaretan: and those that came down toward the sea of the plain, even the salt sea, failed, and were cut off: and the people passed over right against Jericho.And the priests that bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD stood firm on dry ground in the midst of Jordan, and all the Israelites passed over on dry ground, until all the people were passed clean over Jordan.Jos 3:16


If we had absolutely nothing to do with our first birth, a body of death, as to making a decision. For sure it applies to our second.

John 3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

Wavering between faith and walking by sight causing doubt .Doubt is not the opposite of faith it is unbelief (no faith) we simply don’t know God by a decision we make as if the Potter has no understanding.

In the end of the matter...That would simply make the faith of God that does work in us to both will and do His good pleasure without effect .Blaspheming the Holy name by which we are called heavenward.

For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. Rom 3:3
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Is it not possible that they are in heaven? I believe that Christ, fully God, was so exceptional, that everything is possible. Even some old testament saints were resurrected in those times (and we know nothing of what happen with them afterwards)... strange events were happening.
What I meant is the Christ was asking the Father to forgive them of this one sin in crucifying Him, not to forgive them of their sins en toto. Now, if I Sister Magenta's took her post the wrong way, I ask her for her forgiveness. Yes, I agree they could be saved if they were #'d among the elect of God.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
:) Nope, those who do not believe are condemned - their sins were paid for but they chose not to accept the gift of salvation offered them. All throughout scripture anyone can read that unless one believes in the only begotten Son of God and the works accomplished by him and through him - they are condemned. Jesus Christ gave his life to redeem the effect of the fall of Adam upon all mankind, to make reconciliation to God available - and that reconciliation comes only through or by Jesus Christ. "through" or "by" Jesus Christ, i.e. faith (belief) in Jesus Christ.

But these are written, that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you might have life through his name. John 20:31

He that believes on the Son has everlasting life: and he that believes not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abides on him. John 3:36

Atoned:

--to make amends or reparation, as for an offense or a crime, or for an offender (usually followed by for): to atone for one's sins

If the Christ atoned for everybody's sin w/o exception, then He has amended, repaired their stance before the Father. None in this category will ever taste eternal death.

--to make up, as for errors or deficiencies (usually followed by for): to atone for one's failings.

Seeing that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, all are failures. If the Christ atoned for all w/o exception, He has atoned for their failings. When we were this--->For while we were still helpless, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly[Romans 5:6], so if this is applied to everybody w/o exception, then everybody w/o exception has been atoned for, has been reconciled to the Father, has had their failings atoned for.

--to make amends for; expiate: He atoned his sins.

To expiate means to extinguish the guilt incurred by. So, if the Christ atoned for everybody w/o exception, then there is no guilt imputed to them.


--to bring into unity, harmony, concord, etc

So, if the Christ atoned for everybody w/o exception, everybody is united, in a harmonious relationship, in an accord with the Father.


One can not hold to a universal atonement and not also hold to universalism, and remain consistent in their theology.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
I am not misrepresenting you at all. Your claim is that if Christ died for all then all would be saved, which completely overlooks the need for repentance and belief. That your beliefs are logically inconsistent is on you, not me :)
Oh yes you are misrepresenting me, my Sister. You said I deny faith and repentance are necessary for salvation and I have never stated that. That's a bald face lie. Show me one post where I said they are not necessary. If I routinely have said this, then dig a post up where I stated such.

Those who the Christ died for, when the time comes, the Spirit draws them to God via divine quickening. In this divine quickening(regeneration) they are given faith and repentance. When they exercise them they are saved. We are justified, made righteous before God, via faith. God has chosen to justify the nations(KJV uses 'heathen' and the NASB uses 'Gentiles') by faith.[Galatians 3:8] When Abraham believed God, he was credited with righteousness.[Genesis 15:6 & Romans 4:3] Notice that before he came to faith, he was not righteous. So, not everybody w/o exception has faith. 2 Thess. 3:2 testifies to this. If someone has faith, they are credited with righteousness.

But I have NEVER said that faith and repentance are not necessary for salvation. Please recant and repent.
 
Last edited:

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,485
12,950
113
Because, effectively, Christ died only for the elect. Christs Atonement is only for those who are Saved.
The Bible says that the Lamb of God took away the sin of the world, and that Jesus Christ is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world. That is where you must start. So do you believe this or do you not? Jf you believe it, then it follows that Christ's atonement -- His atoning sacrifice where He took the sins of the world upon Himself -- cannot possibly be limited to the elect.
Not all men will obey the gospel because not all men are atoned for.
That is NOT what the Bible says at all. I already posted this, but here it is again:

For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

If "the world might be saved" does it not mean that the sins of the world were atoned for? So "he that believeth not" is the one who fails to obey the Gospel, although God says that he could be saved if he repented and believed.
If the sins of the whole world have been paid for then there is no more sin to cause anyone to go to hell.
I am simply amazed that anyone would make such a statement. Just because Christ paid the penalty for our sins does NOT mean that everyone automatically gets saved. Do you notice this CONDITION which must be met: He that believeth on him is not condemned. So repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ are essential conditions for salvation. Otherwise there would be no need for Gospel preaching.
If the Atonement doesn't apply to everyone do you see how that would make it Limited???
The fact is that is does apply to everyone, and all the supporting Scripture are in the OP. Please read them again, but more importantly BELIEVE them (since it is clear that you have not believed them). While the atonement applies to all humanity, as already pointed out, only those who obey the Gospel will be saved. Why are you unable to see this?
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Atoned:

--to make amends or reparation, as for an offense or a crime, or for an offender (usually followed by for): to atone for one's sins

If the Christ atoned for everybody's sin w/o exception, then He has amended, repaired their stance before the Father. None in this category will ever taste eternal death.

--to make up, as for errors or deficiencies (usually followed by for): to atone for one's failings.

Seeing that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, all are failures. If the Christ atoned for all w/o exception, He has atoned for their failings. When we were this--->For while we were still helpless, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly[Romans 5:6], so if this is applied to everybody w/o exception, then everybody w/o exception has been atoned for, has been reconciled to the Father, has had their failings atoned for.

--to make amends for; expiate: He atoned his sins.

To expiate means to extinguish the guilt incurred by. So, if the Christ atoned for everybody w/o exception, then there is no guilt imputed to them.

--to bring into unity, harmony, concord, etc

So, if the Christ atoned for everybody w/o exception, everybody is united, in a harmonious relationship, in an accord with the Father.

One can not hold to a universal atonement and not also hold to universalism, and remain consistent in their theology.
Not Universalism at all. Christ atoned for the sins of mankind -
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly . . . While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. . . . just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned-- . . . . For if by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reitn in life through the one man, Jesus Christ . . . (those who receive are those who believe)
just as one trespass resulted in condemnation for all people, so also one righteous act resulted in justification and life for all people (Romans 5 NIV) . . . and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement through the shedding of his blood--to be received by faith (trust, belief) (Romans 3 NIV) Christ died for eveyone's sin w/o exception but those who never taste eternal death; those who have been reconciled to the Father are those who believe. Those in Christ.


Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. . . . . John 14:6

Atonement is offered to all w/o exception but only those who believe have remission of sin, reconciliation and salvation = all with distinction.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
After seeing all the Scripture which refute and repudiate limited atonement, is the the best you can come up with? Are you actually denying that sinners must repent and believe the Gospel in order to be saved? If so, you are in opposition to the true Gospel and the Bible.

Just forget about the "Arminian view" and show us the Scriptures which support the false doctrine of limited atonement and that no one needs to obey the Gospel.

Hi Nehemiah.

Thanks for post. The problem is that the verses you supplied do not repudiate limited atonement. I affirm those verses as well, we take into account the whole counsel of God. I can fully agree with the verses you posted that 'whosoever believes' will be saved :). And John 3:16 etc etc.

I don't know anyone who say's you do not have to obey the gospel call? so that is a null and void comment. But I do know His sheep hear His voice ;) I love the verse from 1 Peter ch3 you posted.


v1) Dear friends, this is now my second letter to you. I have written both of them as reminders to stimulate you to wholesome thinking.

v3)Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires

v8-9) But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: with the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. 9The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.



I wonder who Peter is speaking to hear regarding Salvation?? Doesn't seem to me to be a very strong case against Limited atonement. especially when you realize who Peter is referring to.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Oh yes you are misrepresenting me, my Sister. You said I deny faith and repentance are necessary for salvation and I have never stated that. That's a bald face lie. Show me one post where I said they are not necessary. If I routinely have said this, then dig a post up where I stated such.

Those who the Christ died for, when the time comes, the Spirit draws them to God via divine quickening. In this divine quickening(regeneration) they are given faith and repentance. When they exercise them they are saved. We are justified, made righteous before God, via faith. God has chosen to justify the nations(KJV uses 'heathen' and the NASB uses 'Gentiles') by faith.[Galatians 3:8] When Abraham believed God, he was credited with righteousness.[Genesis 15:6 & Romans 4:3] Notice that before he came to faith, he was not righteous. So, not everybody w/o exception has faith. 2 Thess. 3:2 testifies to this. If someone has faith, they are credited with righteousness.

But I have NEVER said that faith and repentance are not necessary for salvation. Please recant and repent.
She is making it appear that you are the Universalist, and that you are saying not all need to repent or have faith since "this is your belief" which it isn't, obviously.

You've preached the Gospel all along, with repentance and faith always included. The false accusation is just that, false. I wouldn't take it to heart.

What she should be saying instead of twisting your words is "Universalists teach that faith and repentance aren't a part of salvation!"

Here is her claim: "Your claim is that if Christ died for all then all would be saved, which completely overlooks the need for repentance and faith." This all sounds OK until examined biblically. She is making the onus of Universalism on you, when it is not. It is not "your claim" it is the claim of Universalism, which ironically is the logical end of her beliefs or the atonement and plan of God through the Gospel to save is undone. God's plan is to save his people from their sins; Matthew 1:21 which would not include paying the sin debt of any other. That is her first mistake.

Her second mistake is that salvation is clinched by a person believing and repenting, when biblically these are gifted by God to those he chose in him before the foundation of the world. Man is not saved by his will or determination, Scripture is clear on this. Furthermore, faith and repentance are evidence of conversion, not the cause. God is the cause of conversion, not man; 1 Peter 1:3. Believing is the work of God, not the work of man; John 6:29. Both repentance and faith are granted by God to those for whom Christ died further dismissing the notion of Universalism and that each and every persons sins were paid for.

The bottom line is that if unlimited atonement were true (based on the error of many who falsely believe each and every sin ever were paid for) then Universalism is its end and people are in hell paying for a debt already paid in full. It is paid whether they "believe" or not.

There is no way around the latter, the argument offered is that the person must apply it. This isn't true, anymore than if someone paid my gas bill that it isn't in effect until I apply it. It matters not what I do with it, it has been paid. Its effect is not initialized the moment I believe it was paid, the fact is it has been paid regardless, and it is already in full effect.

Since limited atonement is true, the logical end is the fulfillment of Matthew 1:21, thus his Gospel is efficacious only for those for whom he died as he made payment for their sins alone. That is the Biblical teaching as "whole world" entails those in every tribe and nation belonging to him; John 10:16, 11:53; Acts 18:9-11 &c not each and every person who ever lived. Salvation is in the power of God unto those whom he decreed to die for in his Gospel, not in the power and will of man and a decision they make. Their truncated gospel is unbiblical and frankly saddening.
 
Last edited:

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,658
3,540
113
One of these days a Calvinist is going to rewrite the bible. Why not? Every other organization is doing it to fit their belief system. Here's some examples to use:

For whosoever "of the elect" shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
For God so loved the world "of the elect"...
God's not willing that any "of the elect" perish, ...
I am the way, the truth and the life "for the elect"...
How Christ died for "the elects sins" according to the scriptures, was buried....

Everyone, feel free to change the bible and add some more...:)
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
One of these days a Calvinist is going to rewrite the bible.
Actually we practice 2 Timothy 2:15 and know what Scripture means, not just what it says. You should try it sometime.

Why not? Every other organization is doing it to fit their belief system.
I love how you just make up things like the above and claim it as if it were true because you said it. "Every other organization is doing it." Really? "every organization" huh? Let's see the proof of your exaggerated slander. :D

Here's some examples to use:

For whosoever "of the elect" shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
For God so loved the world "of the elect"...
God's not willing that any "of the elect" perish, ...
I am the way, the truth and the life "for the elect"...
How Christ died for "the elects sins" according to the scriptures, was buried....

Everyone, feel free to change the bible and add some more...:)
You're closer to truth than you realize, while you still remain in grave error. All the passages you refer to apply only to those whom God has chosen and to none other.

You've claimed recently you are not elect, and reject Ephesians 1 where it says we are chosen in him, then claim you are referred to in Ephesians 2:3, jumping context and mishandling the Word (2 Corinthians 2:17; 2 Corinthians 4:2, 5) . Your claim is an impossibility because those in the latter are only those referred to in the former. You don't practice 2 Timothy 2:15. You have that old "Burger King theology." :D

Furthermore, Romans 8:28-39 does not, by your own admission above, apply to you.