The Logic of Gay Marriage Equality

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
Your first mistake is equating the sin of immoral homosexual acts with "being gay." "Being gay" is to be lighthearted and carefree. Obviously, such a person would not be seeking to use the government as an agency to persecute normatively moral people by depriving them of their human right under natural law to a free moral conscience and their religious liberty toward a normative morality.
Please, no word games. You know what I'm referring to. To some "Jesus" means Zeus. These people are not seeking anything. They are being used and manipulated for the same reason you are. To keep separation and enmity between you two.

Your second mistake is in discarding God's holiness as if it were dog poo on your shoe. It is in scripture we find the proper relationship between God's moral law and His agape love. Two equal and opposite dangers must be avoided:
You do not know what it means to be holy. To start, it means to be set apart, but that's a topic for another time and thread. And I choose to keep love simple. If you are married, did you give your wife a set of "moral laws" responsibilities and functions to define your love? Or did you make a vow to love her FOR BETTER OR FOR WORST???

1. Legalism effectively ousts agape love as a dynamic of the gospel and the Christian life by reducing both to obedience or conformity to a set of external commands or rules (after the manner of the scribes and Pharisees in the gospels).
This is exactly what you are doing to homosexuals in going to the law. I couldn't have said it better. Again love is simple, it covers faults and sins, and it leads to forgiveness and the understanding of grace.

2. Its opposite, antinomianism, ousts God's moral law as a dynamic of the gospel and the Christian life. Antinomianism is heresy that tells Christians it's OK to forget about God's law and concentrate solely on agape love... a course which is a justification for degeneration and immoral license rather than promoting the true Christian liberty (i.e. freedom from sin).
Can't tell you what "Antinomianism" is but to love (that word again) your neighbor as yourself fulfills ALL of whatever moral law you have indoctrinated yourself upon. Can a homosexual love you as himself? Yes. Law fulfilled!

Why can't you do the same? Any man who hates his brother is a murderer, correct? You see yourself saved, and still call yourself a sinner, and then want to bring condemnation on another for being the same? So when you speak of these things, do you not teach yourself? Or are not these people your brethren too?

Have we not all one father? Have not one God created us? So if any man sees himself saved no matter what, what greater love can he has to see the same in everyone else, his brethren.

The Gospel of Jesus Christ and God's grace in Jesus Christ frees the Christian from both these erroneous tendencies but only if Christians respectfully strive to follow God's moral law and both practice and realize agape love in their lives.
The first part is true to a real Christian, that no matter what tribulation he may go through in life, his inner man is at peace because he knows where he is going. He knows this because he can see in faith all there with him. The red is something that men came up with. If you cannot understand what I am saying in nothing else, try to understand that NO MAN ASKED TO BE HERE to begin with. Now I can break down biblically how the commandment of homosexuality was done away with, but you will not listen. The bible is a powerful two edged sword. What that means is that there's a thread on CC supporting the trinity complete with verses, and there are threads that dispute the trinity complete with verses. So then it is the heart that directs what a person will get out of it. Are you looking for life, or are you looking for death? Now let me give you an example of what I mean.

There is a law in the bible that says pretty much that if a man rapes a female, he must pay the woman's father and keep her.

Obviously this law does NOT apply to us in this day and time and you can understand that, but do you know why this law was written to begin with?
The goal of Christianity is to be spiritually reborn into a new creature with a new nature that desires God's holiness (and love) into God's kingdom embarking on a life of sanctification (e.g. purifying oneself of sin even as Christ is pure as per 1 John 3:3).
This is true in its proper meaning. Emphasis on the word NEW. But if we continue (which we are doing) on the things we KNOW are destroyed (if they die for being gay, then what WILL you die for) that makes us transgressors.

This is why I say everyday here to get rid of money! There are 7 billion people here on this planet today. How much of the percentage of this do you really believe are homosexual (come on you all, use common sense, we are 7BILLION PEOPLE)?

Choosing to engage in homosexual acts is an issue of men that has already been judged by God. As such, there's nothing "gay" about it. As Jesus said in Matthew 7:23, "I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'"
Again, the first part is true. The wages of sin is death, as such you are judged the same as well. By the law no flesh is justified, not even Jesus. So why use the law unjustly when you yourself cannot be justified by it?

The part in red is us. We still die in the midst of a risen savior.

Salvation-->Sanctification-->Glorification is God's formula. You're formula is Salvation-->Desecration--> Glorification. Can you guess where the problem is with your formula? (Hint: replace Desecration with Sanctification).
This makes no sense.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
another attack of family values from the enemy

Before I took office, we had only one openly gay federal judge to be confirmed by the Senate. Now, along with Todd, Judy, and Nitza, that number is 11. So we’re making some progress. (Applause.)
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
another attack of family values from the enemy

Before I took office, we had only one openly gay federal judge to be confirmed by the Senate. Now, along with Todd, Judy, and Nitza, that number is 11. So we’re making some progress. (Applause.)
I'm not gay. I just don't condemn. And if you see me as an enemy, aren't you supposed to feed and clothe me? To overcome evil with good?

People that are homosexuals are a very small percentage of people out of 7 billion who are straight obviously. But because of money it is ramped up by the mainstream media to get church people riled up in order to make MONEY from the books and tv shows that are out about being gay.

There is a saying that it takes a village to raise a child. You know why? Because we all are family.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Word games? I'm not playing word games. You made a statement that people can live a depraved life of sexual immorality and it's all good because God IS love revealing that you have a seriously flawed understanding of the doctrine of grace in relation to God's holiness. I corrected your false assertion. As a straight A M.Div. with more than twenty-five years of living as a genuine Christian, I'm qualified to do that. So let's correct more of your false assertions.

1. Jesus Christ is NOT a fabricated pagan Roman deity but rather the very real resurrected living son of God.

2. Consistent with the Old Testament, in the New Testament holiness takes on purity or freedom from sin. The fullness of the biblical witness testifies to God’s holiness (understood as God’s “otherness” and “purity”) as well as to God’s prerogative to set people and things apart for God’s own purposes together with the resulting godliness in the lives of those whom God declares to be holy.

As is the case in the Old Testament, a holy God calls people to holiness (1 Pet. 1:15–16). Holiness continues to be permanently required of God’s people. The adjective hagios is often used substantially to refer to Christians in the relationship to God. Through the sanctifying presence of the indwelling Spirit, on the basis of the atoning work of Christ, people who believe are saved and called to progress in holiness purifying themselves even as Christ is pure (e.g. sanctification) in preparation for eternity spent with holy God.

Hence: Salvation-->Sanctification-->Glorification NOT Salvation-->Desecration-->Glorification.

Genuine Christians (not mere people who profess to be Christians) realize the progressive action of obtaining holiness in their life over time (a process known as sanctification).

Paul uses the terms ‘righteousness’ and ‘sanctification’ in a way which shows their inseparability. Paul could not conceive of a person brought into a right relationship with God whose life would not result in progressive sanctification (i.e. a life of progressive holiness). Read Romans 6.

Paul has in mind both a state and a process of sanctification. That Paul can speak of both aspects of sanctification is confirmed in 2 Cor. 7:1. Here, in language reminiscent of the Old Testament context of purity and holiness, he urges his alienated readers to "cleanse yourselves from every defilement of body and spirit, and make holiness perfect."

His Christian readers are to purge themselves in every part, inwardly and outwardly (see Ps. 24:2–3, ‘clean hands and pure heart’), and live out the implications of their grace-given relationship to the holy God.

This is something, of course, only achieved with the help of God Himself. Were it not for the indwelling presence of the HOLY Spirit, all of this might seem to be mere wishful thinking. But Paul considers the sanctified life to be possible because of the indwelling presence of God’s empowering HOLY Spirit (2 Thes. 2:13). Indeed, he says, anyone who rejects this way of living, rejects God who gives his Holy Spirit to you (1 Thes. 4:8).

Truth is found in correspondence. For example, if you sodomize people then you are a sodomizer. If you lie, then you are a liar. If you engage in sexual immorality, then you are a sexually immoral person.

This is why sexual immorality (i.e. homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality, fornication, adultery, etc...) does NOT correspond to God's holiness.

Now antinomianism is a term used to characterize believers in the early church who wrongly thought that salvation by faith in Jesus Christ freed them from all moral obligations and that they could sin with impunity (Gk anti, “against,” + nomos, “law”) exactly like you do. That's why the Apostles took care to refute it in letters to the early church.

Read 1 Timothy 1:9-11: "We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine 11 that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God..."

Read Ephesians 5: "Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God. But sexual immorality and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints. Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving. For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.

Read 1 Thessalonians 4: "Finally, then, brothers, we ask and urge you in the Lord Jesus, that as you received from us how you ought to walk and to please God, just as you are doing, that you do so more and more. For you know what instructions we gave you through the Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, not in the passion of lust like the Gentiles who do not know God."

Read 1 Corinthians 6: 12-20 "18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body. 19 Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies."

Etc... etc... etc...

The issue is not whether those outside God's kingdom are or are not Christian (their status is known), but whether those within the church (e.g. all regenerated believers of Christ worldwide past, present, and future in God's kingdoms joined to Christ via their spiritual rebirth [e.g. regeneration of one's spirit and soul by the Holy Spirit Rom 8:9-10; John 3:7; Titus 3:5-8; 1 Peter 1:3, etc...]) are truly regenerate or merely professing to be.

If people claim to be regenerate and live wicked lives filled with blatant sexual immorality such as homosexuality, John the apostle states that the regeneration of those people should be doubted for their life shows that they are still a child of the devil in an unregenerate state. Jesus and the apostles clearly state in the Bible that we do NOT all have one father. Jesus and the apostles refute your false assertions.

God's normative morality is very simply that which aligns with God's holiness or in theology that which corresponds to God's holiness qualified by an accurate application of His special revelation.
Jesus Christ taught on the Sermon on the Mount:

"Thus you will recognize them by their fruits. Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?' And then will I declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.'" Matthew 7:20-23

Using your logic, a person could be committing adultery with his father's wife and as long as he "loved" them (it wouldn't be with God's love obviously because if it was he wouldn't be engaging in sexual immorality with his father's wife for he would love his father and his wife too much to engage in sexual immorality with them) it would be all good for they would just be breaking a "moral law" that has no consequence or significance as long as he loves them.

That's how ignorant and deceived you are. The truth is that if he truly loved his neighbor, he wouldn't commit sexual immorality period. If you truly love someone, you don't engage in depraved sexual perversity with them. You've got it all backwards. Let's see what Paul the Apostle actually says about this very situation in the Bible.

Read 1 Corinthians 5:

"It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that even pagans do not tolerate: A man is sleeping with his father’s wife. And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have gone into mourning and have put out of your fellowship the man who has been doing this? For my part, even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. As one who is present with you in this way, I have already passed judgment in the name of our Lord Jesus on the one who has been doing this. So when you are assembled and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, 5 hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord.

Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole batch of dough? Get rid of the old yeast, so that you may be a new unleavened batch—as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people.

What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. “'Expel the wicked person from among you.'”

So you're a false teacher "Flamingspirit" who teaches EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THE BIBLE DOES.

You equate a covenant established by God Himself (e.g. marriage between one man and one woman) with sexual immorality.

You state that God's holiness is not relevant for humanity any longer.

You confuse God's agape love shed in the heart of the regenerate by God's own HOLY Spirit with carnal feelings the unregenerate have for those they partner with in sexual immorality.

You have a serious misunderstanding of the doctrines of grace and morality.

You show that you have no idea what true love is.

You call righteousness hateful. You falsely accuse people who love God and His holiness and because their hearts have been regenerated by God's own HOLY spirit hateful if they point out that sexual immorality is sin because they love others with God's pure love.

Jesus Christ, the apostles, the church fathers, the Holy Bible, etc... ALL refute and oppose your false assertions.

Your theology is false. Your logic is fallacious. You are either deceived or a liar but either way you're a false teacher.


Please, no word games. You know what I'm referring to. To some "Jesus" means Zeus. These people are not seeking anything. They are being used and manipulated for the same reason you are. To keep separation and enmity between you two.

You do not know what it means to be holy. To start, it means to be set apart, but that's a topic for another time and thread. And I choose to keep love simple. If you are married, did you give your wife a set of "moral laws" responsibilities and functions to define your love? Or did you make a vow to love her FOR BETTER OR FOR WORST???

This is exactly what you are doing to homosexuals in going to the law. I couldn't have said it better. Again love is simple, it covers faults and sins, and it leads to forgiveness and the understanding of grace.

Can't tell you what "Antinomianism" is but to love (that word again) your neighbor as yourself fulfills ALL of whatever moral law you have indoctrinated yourself upon. Can a homosexual love you as himself? Yes. Law fulfilled!

Why can't you do the same? Any man who hates his brother is a murderer, correct? You see yourself saved, and still call yourself a sinner, and then want to bring condemnation on another for being the same? So when you speak of these things, do you not teach yourself? Or are not these people your brethren too?

Have we not all one father? Have not one God created us? So if any man sees himself saved no matter what, what greater love can he has to see the same in everyone else, his brethren.

The first part is true to a real Christian, that no matter what tribulation he may go through in life, his inner man is at peace because he knows where he is going. He knows this because he can see in faith all there with him. The red is something that men came up with. If you cannot understand what I am saying in nothing else, try to understand that NO MAN ASKED TO BE HERE to begin with. Now I can break down biblically how the commandment of homosexuality was done away with, but you will not listen. The bible is a powerful two edged sword. What that means is that there's a thread on CC supporting the trinity complete with verses, and there are threads that dispute the trinity complete with verses. So then it is the heart that directs what a person will get out of it. Are you looking for life, or are you looking for death? Now let me give you an example of what I mean.

There is a law in the bible that says pretty much that if a man rapes a female, he must pay the woman's father and keep her.

Obviously this law does NOT apply to us in this day and time and you can understand that, but do you know why this law was written to begin with?
This is true in its proper meaning. Emphasis on the word NEW. But if we continue (which we are doing) on the things we KNOW are destroyed (if they die for being gay, then what WILL you die for) that makes us transgressors.
8
This is why I say everyday here to get rid of money! There are 7 billion people here on this planet today. How much of the percentage of this do you really believe are homosexual (come on you all, use common sense, we are 7BILLION PEOPLE)?

Again, the first part is true. The wages of sin is death, as such you are judged the same as well. By the law no flesh is justified, not even Jesus. So why use the law unjustly when you yourself cannot be justified by it?

The part in red is us. We still die in the midst of a risen savior.


This makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Typo, should read: "You falsely accuse people who love God and His holiness because their hearts have been regenerated by God's own HOLY spirit hateful if they point out that sexual immorality is sin because they love others with God's pure love and don't wish to see them suffer the spiritual (and other) consequences of living a life immersed in sexual depravity (which you falsely assert is OK because "God IS love").

But let me quote some Bible scholars to show you just how far from the mark you are with your misuse of "God IS love."

"This particular verse is part of a whole series of Johannine statements, including 1 John 2:29 ("If you know that he is righteous, you know that everyone who does what is right has been born of him") and 1 John 4:7–8 ("Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love").

Each of these statements connects righteous living in some form (for example, love, doing good) to being a Christian (being born of God, being from God). Taken out of context any one of them would seem to imply that a person could deny Christ and yet qualify as being "from God." In fact, a guru who turned out to be genuinely caring and loving, but embraced Hindu theology, might on that basis find John endorsing his claim to be an incarnation of divinity! The key to this interpretive dilemma, however, is precisely the phrase "taken out of context," for within the context such a meaning is impossible.

In its proper context, the wider issue surrounding 3 John 7 is the behavior of Diotrephes. Diotrephes is a powerful church leader who may have the power to exclude Gaius and his house church from the wider Christian community if Gaius follows the elder’s instructions and receives the traveling missionaries. The author is telling Gaius not to follow evil but good. The verse in question, then, suggests that Diotrephes is not from God or has not seen God, for he is doing evil, not good.

This is an application of the principle that Jesus spoke concerning false prophets, "By their fruit you will recognize them" (Mt 7:16). If a person is truly a Christian, the proper lifestyle should be evident. If it is not, then, far from copying their behavior, one should doubt the reality of their new birth.

The same issue occurs in each of the other contexts. First John 2:29 begins a series of statements on righteousness (1 Jn 3:3, 6, 7, 9) that culminates in "This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are:

'Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother" (1 Jn 3:10). The issue, then, is not whether those outside the church are or are not Christian (their status is known), but whether those within the church are truly born again. If people claim to believe orthodox theology and do not live righteously, John states, the regeneration of those people should be doubted, for their life shows that they are still a child of the devil."

Reference: Kaiser, W. C., Jr., Davids, P. H., Bruce, F. F., & Brauch, M. T. (1996). Hard sayings of the Bible (752). Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity.

Obviously, you pulled it all out of context "Flamingspirit" and made serious egregious false assertions to justify sexual immorality in COMPLETE CONTRADICTION to what John the apostle was actually saying.
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
No. I just realize that if I die, and I'm not gay or I haven't killed anyone or any of the most condemned of our society then that makes me no better than them. If I am guilty of one point in the law, I am guilty of all. So I would rather forgive all to be forgiven my sins. And you were playing word games with the word "gay". I know what it means by definition. I also know what it means in this context in this day and age and you do too.
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
Not many wise. You study too much. Remember Christ is simple. He died forgiving all who came to Him. He forgave those that later turned away from Him. And PLEASE take into account that the only people He was at odds with were those who DIDN'T FORGIVE.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
You don't study enough and made (and continue to make) serious false assertions. I will continue to refute your blatant false teaching BECAUSE I love God and I love others.

Jesus forgave all who came to him and told them to, "Go and sin no more." He never in any way, any shape, or any form ever condoned sin whatsoever but instructed those He forgave to "Go and sin no more."

Jesus forgave Peter for denying Him after Peter repented of his sin but I'm not aware of Jesus forgiving those who abandoned him to live a life immersed in sexual depravity: please provide evidence to support this false assertion of yours.

The Bible always presents Christ's interactions with sinners as that of an agent of redemptive change. Salvation-->Sanctification-->Glorification. That's Christ's formula.

And forgiving someone is not the same as condoning their sin or allowing it to corrupt you, your family, or your society. And if their sin injures me I can be assured that God's eventually going to deal with it in this life or the next: Romans 12:19 - "Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God's wrath, for it is written: 'It is mine to avenge; I will repay,' says the Lord."

You need to take some Bible classes pronto.


Not many wise. You study too much. Remember Christ is simple. He died forgiving all who came to Him. He forgave those that later turned away from Him. And PLEASE take into account that the only people He was at odds with were those who DIDN'T FORGIVE.
 
Jun 26, 2014
224
4
0
Being gay is an issue of men not God. Love covers transgression, and God IS love.
2 Peter 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

Romans 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

Sounds like its an issue of God, not men.
 
C

churchmouse

Guest
In Gods eyes there is no logic to gay marriage because it would be sin. There is not one scripture or reference in the entire Bible where God condones any sex outside the marriage of one man and one woman. When it happens God condemns and calls it sin.

What we have today are luke warm Christians who do not recognize God as authority over their lives. His standards are not theirs...they try to find loopholes to make their sin acceptable. But the truth is the truth and sin is sin and they would be deceiving themselves by thinking that any other union but what Christ said was Godly was Gods standard.

This is not about love but OBEDIENCE. God disciplines His children..and when He does it..it does not mean He loves them less. You don't reward the lawbreaker...and anyone that sins is just that.
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
2 Peter 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

Romans 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

Sounds like its an issue of God, not men.
Ezekiel 16:48-50

48 As I live, saith the Lord God, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters.


49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.


50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.

Nothing about being gay.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
The Logic of a Depraved Mind

The Logic of a Depraved Mind:


For I am not ashamed of the gospel: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is revealed a righteousness of God from faith unto faith: as it is written, But the righteous shall live by faith.


Rom. 1:18
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hinder the truth in unrighteousness; 19 because that which is known of God is manifest in them; for God manifested it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but

became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools . . . .



Rom. 1:24
Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.


Rom. 1:26
For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.


Rom. 1:28
And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting;
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
We believe we need money to live. How much more reprobate does the mind need to be?

Straight church goers believe that all gays will burn in hell. Well, why do straight people die? Some other sin?

To to be guilty in one point on the law is to be guilty of all the law!

That means to God, all us straight people who dies might as well have been gay to God. We're guilty of that too!
 

jandian

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2011
772
11
18
You know the bible talks about levels of evil spiritual existence.

Eph 6. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age,[c] against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.

Its important to note that there is a difference in a spiritual atmosphere when the law backs up wickedness. GOD refers to sin of any kind as wickedness.
 
C

churchmouse

Guest
We believe we need money to live. How much more reprobate does the mind need to be?

Straight church goers believe that all gays will burn in hell. Well, why do straight people die? Some other sin?

To to be guilty in one point on the law is to be guilty of all the law!

That means to God, all us straight people who dies might as well have been gay to God. We're guilty of that too!

I am an evangelical Christian..I do not believe that because someone might be gay they will go to hell. I believe there is only one sin that would keep one from hell and that is the denial of Jesus Christ.

Being gay is not the sin...the sin is acting on it sexually as heterosexuals do as well outside marriage. All sex outside the bonds of marriage is sin.
 
Jun 4, 2014
1,849
9
0
I am an evangelical Christian..I do not believe that because someone might be gay they will go to hell. I believe there is only one sin that would keep one from hell and that is the denial of Jesus Christ.

Being gay is not the sin...the sin is acting on it sexually as heterosexuals do as well outside marriage. All sex outside the bonds of marriage is sin.
The problem with that is "marriage" is defined improperly. True marriage is the union of spirit and flesh. My body is stuck with whoever is emotionally running it from the inside, for better or worst till death do us part.