The Secret Gospel of Mark

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Budman

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2014
4,153
1,998
113
#21
Here's some decent advice:

If anyone claims to have "secret" knowledge regarding Jesus or the Scriptures...


...run.
 
G

GracefulT

Guest
#22
Awesome it is in his word where he will reveal himself to you
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#23
I realise that. But I also realise that man selected what went into the bible and man selected what wouldn't go into the bible. I also have developed an interested into why things were included or omitted. Because as far as I know,
there is nothing in the bible that says how a bible should be compiled.
There is likewise nothing in the Bible that says how the existence of God should be proven.

Rule #1: What goes in the NT Bible must be in agreement with apostolic teaching.

I think it's an interesting little diversion to find out how it was all decided
 
Last edited:
P

phil112

Guest
#24
Hi all, I've just done my second read through of The Gospels and then took to the internet for some supporting research and came across The Secret Gospel of Mark. Sort of an extended version of Mark.

There are divided opinions on it and the controversial content within. Is anyone familiar with this?
Allan, there is a lot of things that happened in Jesus' day that we don't know about. Somewhere in the bible we're told (someone look that passage up for us please) that if everything Jesus did and said was recorded the earth wouldn't be big enough to hold it.
That being said, think about this: If something was secret, until recently, that would mean that somehow there was gospel God wanted us to have that people didn't get for 2000 years. That is impossible. The bible is complete and it contains all that God wanted us to know at this time.

Keep your nose in the bible. The reward is beyond your imagination and/or belief.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#25
Psssst, can you translate that into stuff normal people understand? I had to look up pericope, so I could get all the way to Byzantine before going, "huh?" (And, yes, I get Byzantine is an earlier version of the Bible, but that doesn't tell me if it is trustworthy or not. Alexandrinus -- if that's from Alexandria, Egypt -- makes my eye twitch a bit, since those Christians were wiped out so quickly after Christ died. So I'm really catching about 25% of what you're saying. lol) I'm thinking you're saying it's really something, but outside of that, huh?

And, if I'm right, according to the word pericope, sounds like it's a little slice instead of a full "secret" gospel.
A pericope is just any designated portion of a text such as the one in question. These manuscripts represent very good evidence in support of that text. It is amazing to me that many of those who try to call the portion of Mark 16 into question citing poor manuscript evidence as the reason are some of the same ones who will fight to the death to defend the Comma Johanneum (1John 5:7-8) in spite of the fact that it has almost NO early manuscript evidence to support it. People simply do not like what the longer reading of Mark 16 has to say so they attempt to find some way to discredit it. The truth is that it simply cannot be discredited on the basis of insufficient reliable manuscript evidence.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#26
No, but I've started to read the bible because I feel maybe something is drawing me to it.
Best advise we can offer to a seeker:

1. Pray that God open your mind as you seek Him.

2. Simply read His word, without commentaries or others' opinions.

3. If you have questions, seek out someone that you personally trust, whom you can talk to face-to-face, or at least over the phone or via Skype. IMs and emails are even to open to misinterpretation from someone you know, so be able to hear their voice and, if possible, see their face.

4. Pray that God gives you others who can help you understand Him, who can offer solid testimony of what He has done in their lives through Jesus Christ.

5. Ask them to pray for you, that you have understanding, that you are open to His leading. Also, that you would be led to a good church that will help you understand even more.

6. Ask us to pray for you, in whatever ways you feel the need for prayer.

7. Don't be afraid. This is an exciting time.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#27
There is no Theologian who has not read all 150-200 (or more) of the non-canonical books. Enjoy them, but don't let them get you mixed up.

Remember, even the Bible doesn't say everything found in it is "the accurate truth"... it just claims to be inspired and useful as recorded.
Ps 33:4; 119:160?
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#28
So how it was compiled, who compiled it, why it was compiled etc are not important?

Its not important why some books are in and some books are out?

Its not important who set the standard for what should be included?

Surely this should be investigated aswell. Rather than saying "Here's a book, read it! Its true!"

I need more than that
.
Yep. . .you need the Holy Spirit, who does the convincing, not your investigations.
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#29
after the biblical gospels were written numerous other 'gospels' appeared adding to or embellishing the originals...there was an entire literary 'industry' producing secret gospels...infancy gospels...gospels attributed to other apostles and other new testament characters...gnostic gospels...and so on...

there were two primary motivations for these fabrications...one was to satisfy people's natural curiosity by 'filling in the blanks' left in the original gospels with their own fiction...for example the authors of the infancy gospels made up stories of jesus' childhood...

the same kind of thing had happened with the old testament books a few hundred years earlier...that is the origin of jubilees and the enochian literature...wherever scripture does not go into detail someone will try to fill in the blanks with mythology...

the second reason was more sinister...cults were springing up everywhere...and with christianity being the fastest growing religion at the time...there were many cults that wanted to make it appear that their teachings came from jesus...they did this by fabricating gospels that depicted jesus teaching their doctrines...
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#30
A pericope is just any designated portion of a text such as the one in question. These manuscripts represent very good evidence in support of that text. It is amazing to me that many of those who try to call the portion of Mark 16 into question citing poor manuscript evidence as the reason are some of the same ones who will fight to the death to defend the Comma Johanneum (1John 5:7-8) in spite of the fact that it has almost NO early manuscript evidence to support it. People simply do not like what the longer reading of Mark 16 has to say so they attempt to find some way to discredit it. The truth is that it simply cannot be discredited on the basis of insufficient reliable manuscript evidence.
Oldhermit, they are talking about THE SECRET Gospel of Mark, not Mark or ch 16.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#31
Oldhermit, they are talking about THE SECRET Gospel of Mark, not Mark or ch 16.
Yeah, but Allan sees it as the extended version of Mark, not another Mark, so it could be the same thing.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#32
So how it was compiled, who compiled it, why it was compiled etc are not important?

Its not important why some books are in and some books are out?

Its not important who set the standard for what should be included?

Surely this should be investigated aswell. Rather than saying "Here's a book, read it! Its true!"

I need more than that.
May I safely assume you have some device to access the Internet -- like a smartphone, tablet, or computer? Assuming yes, may I assume it came with an instruction book?

Quick. Who wrote that? When? How? Did the writer get it all right, or is there debate going on about some aspect of it? After all, how can you possibly trust a book when you don't know all that stuff, right? (Yes, I am sarcastic. Why do you ask? lol)

How did you trust your textbooks back in school? How do you trust sites online? Do you investigate them too? Do you then research who the author is? And, yes, I'm not completely nuts, there really does come a time when it's time to research all this stuff, but, really? Why this book, without doing the same thing to all other reference books you've ever read?

Have you ever studied anything else that you were curious about just to study it before? (I'm also assume you've done that too.) Ever pick a subject that you weren't completely caught up in believing even when you started?

For me, it's dinosaurs and older hominids. The stuff fascinates me, probably since I grew up near the site where they found the first full skeleton in America and actually finally figured out there really were some huge reptiles living in America before Europeans ever came here. But, yo, I'm a creationist, so obviously I'm still skeptical. That's fine. Not like I can't believe in dinos and earlier forms of humans, right? But I do read with an open mind, let it sink in, don't have to spend much (usually any) time figuring out who the writer was or why he/she wrote, and can still think on my own after I'm done.

Tell me you can't do the same thing.

So really? Why are you wasting this much time researching all the background to every book you're reading in the Bible just to settle on if you should believe it? Not like that's needed, but here you are doing that anyway.

Just seems to me you're spending an inordinate amount of time making up reasons to skip what you already promised you do -- read the Bible.

Lots of folks have been telling you how to read it, who you need to decipher it, what you need here and what you need there, but despite all that, you said from the beginning you just want to read it. Okay? Read it.

I trust in three things right now:
1. You're smart enough to read it all the way through.
2. If God is going to do something with you as you read it, God's going to do something with you as you read it.
3. I've read enough reference books written by fallible man to know Man is capable of writing stuff without errors once in a while. If something has a bunch of errors in it, the writing won't make a big splash and won't continue to be read. If it's relatively error free, the writing will stick around for a while. (The Bible is, at least, 1900 years old. Some of it is much older than that, and it's still the all-time best seller.)

I have no idea if God will get through to you or not, but whatever plans he has, he'll do. You're just supposed to read it. So, seriously, who cares if there is a secret gospel of Mark or not? Kind of like trying to figure out Dobby's genealogy before reading Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire. Who cares until you actually read it and that's not part of the story anyway.

And, that's just me knowing I can come up with just as many excuses not to do something I set myself to do as you can. lol
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#33
Psssst, can you translate that into stuff normal people understand? I had to look up pericope, so I could get all the way to Byzantine before going, "huh?" (And, yes, I get Byzantine is an earlier version of the Bible, but that doesn't tell me if it is trustworthy or not. Alexandrinus -- if that's from Alexandria, Egypt -- makes my eye twitch a bit, since those Christians were wiped out so quickly after Christ died. So I'm really catching about 25% of what you're saying. lol) I'm thinking you're saying it's really something, but outside of that, huh?

And, if I'm right, according to the word pericope, sounds like it's a little slice instead of a full "secret" gospel.
You had to look up the word pericope? What's wrong with you? Haven't you ever been on a submarine before? haha. Only kidding.
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#34
So how it was compiled, who compiled it, why it was compiled etc are not important?

Its not important why some books are in and some books are out?

Its not important who set the standard for what should be included?

Surely this should be investigated aswell. Rather than saying "Here's a book, read it! Its true!"

I need more than that.
All of these things are very important and there's nothing wrong with you asking the types of questions that you've asked here. If anything, then there's something terribly wrong with some of the answers that you've received here.
 
T

tanach

Guest
#35
I read something about it. A copy of a letter alleged to have been written by Clement of Alexandria was supposed to have been discovered
by an academic called Morton Smith in a Monastry back in the 1970s. It was written on the back of an old book about Clement. This letter disappeared some time later. In it Clement quotes a passage from what he claimed to be a more spiritual version of Marks Gospel. It has something to do with a youth that Jesus raised from the dead and is similar to the story of Lazarus. People are divided as to whether it was Genuine oor a forgery created by Smith himself. Whatever the answer it all sounds a bit fishy to me.
 
Last edited:

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,780
2,943
113
#36
Allan, you will pardon me for asking, but you seem to be aging at an extremely rapid rate.

I am certain you were young when you started posting here.

The other day you were 79. Then yesterday, 81. Today 82. Are you the Incredible Aging Man?

Very confused as to why your age keeps going up and up!
 
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#37
Allan, you will pardon me for asking, but you seem to be aging at an extremely rapid rate.

I am certain you were young when you started posting here.

The other day you were 79. Then yesterday, 81. Today 82. Are you the Incredible Aging Man?

Very confused as to why your age keeps going up and up!
I think that you're looking at his post count and mistaking it for his age.
 
A

AllanSnackbar

Guest
#38
May I safely assume you have some device to access the Internet -- like a smartphone, tablet, or computer? Assuming yes, may I assume it came with an instruction book?

Quick. Who wrote that? When? How? Did the writer get it all right, or is there debate going on about some aspect of it? After all, how can you possibly trust a book when you don't know all that stuff, right? (Yes, I am sarcastic. Why do you ask? lol)

How did you trust your textbooks back in school? How do you trust sites online? Do you investigate them too? Do you then research who the author is? And, yes, I'm not completely nuts, there really does come a time when it's time to research all this stuff, but, really? Why this book, without doing the same thing to all other reference books you've ever read?

Have you ever studied anything else that you were curious about just to study it before? (I'm also assume you've done that too.) Ever pick a subject that you weren't completely caught up in believing even when you started?

For me, it's dinosaurs and older hominids. The stuff fascinates me, probably since I grew up near the site where they found the first full skeleton in America and actually finally figured out there really were some huge reptiles living in America before Europeans ever came here. But, yo, I'm a creationist, so obviously I'm still skeptical. That's fine. Not like I can't believe in dinos and earlier forms of humans, right? But I do read with an open mind, let it sink in, don't have to spend much (usually any) time figuring out who the writer was or why he/she wrote, and can still think on my own after I'm done.

Tell me you can't do the same thing.

So really? Why are you wasting this much time researching all the background to every book you're reading in the Bible just to settle on if you should believe it? Not like that's needed, but here you are doing that anyway.

Just seems to me you're spending an inordinate amount of time making up reasons to skip what you already promised you do -- read the Bible.

Lots of folks have been telling you how to read it, who you need to decipher it, what you need here and what you need there, but despite all that, you said from the beginning you just want to read it. Okay? Read it.

I trust in three things right now:
1. You're smart enough to read it all the way through.
2. If God is going to do something with you as you read it, God's going to do something with you as you read it.
3. I've read enough reference books written by fallible man to know Man is capable of writing stuff without errors once in a while. If something has a bunch of errors in it, the writing won't make a big splash and won't continue to be read. If it's relatively error free, the writing will stick around for a while. (The Bible is, at least, 1900 years old. Some of it is much older than that, and it's still the all-time best seller.)

I have no idea if God will get through to you or not, but whatever plans he has, he'll do. You're just supposed to read it. So, seriously, who cares if there is a secret gospel of Mark or not? Kind of like trying to figure out Dobby's genealogy before reading Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire. Who cares until you actually read it and that's not part of the story anyway.

And, that's just me knowing I can come up with just as many excuses not to do something I set myself to do as you can. lol
Its not making excuses. I am reading it.

This endeavour could change my life and others have told me this could be the single most important thing I ever do.

Are you saying something that carries that much weight shouldn't be researched properly?

You can't just put a book in front of someone that doesn't match up with their current view of the world and expect them to take in on face value. Especially when it directly conflicts with everything you thought you knew about the world.

For me to accept this, I have to change my entire world view. Everything I thought I knew will be eradicated. To say I'm sidestepping reading the bible in favour of researching it is ridiculous. I read sections, re read sections, look for further information and I get all views that may oppose or agree.

Anyone who Doesnt do that is not really trying to understand anything.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#39
Hi all, I've just done my second read through of The Gospels and then took to the internet for some supporting research and came across The Secret Gospel of Mark. Sort of an extended version of Mark.

There are divided opinions on it and the controversial content within. Is anyone familiar with this?
Yeah, but Allan sees it as the extended version of Mark, not another Mark, so it could be the same thing.
You sure about that? I think that is Allan's perception but Marc was treating it as if Allan was speaking of the Gospel esp. ch 16
 
Last edited:
P

purgedconscience

Guest
#40
Its not making excuses. I am reading it.

This endeavour could change my life and others have told me this could be the single most important thing I ever do.

Are you saying something that carries that much weight shouldn't be researched properly?

You can't just put a book in front of someone that doesn't match up with their current view of the world and expect them to take in on face value. Especially when it directly conflicts with everything you thought you knew about the world.

For me to accept this, I have to change my entire world view. Everything I thought I knew will be eradicated. To say I'm sidestepping reading the bible in favour of researching it is ridiculous. I read sections, re read sections, look for further information and I get all views that may oppose or agree.

Anyone who Doesnt do that is not really trying to understand anything.
Again, there's nothing wrong with what you're doing.