H
Hello heartofdavid!
That verse does not say that there is no man in heaven! Here is the verse in a couple different translations:
New International Version
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth could open the scroll or even look inside it.
New Living Translation
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll and read it.
English Standard Version
And no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or to look into it,
Berean Study Bible
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or look inside it.
Berean Literal Bible
And no one in heaven, nor upon the earth, nor under the earth, was able to open the scroll, nor to see it.
New American Standard Bible
And no one in heaven or on the earth or under the earth was able to open the book or to look into it.
King James Bible
And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or even to look in it.
International Standard Version
Therefore, the verse is not stating that there is no man in heaven, but that no one in heaven, nor on the earth nor under the earth, will be able to open the scroll. In addition, you have 24 elders mention sitting on thrones, which would be referring to resurrected men.
Let's research these things before making these claims, heartofdavid.
That verse does not say that there is no man in heaven! Here is the verse in a couple different translations:
New International Version
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth could open the scroll or even look inside it.
New Living Translation
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll and read it.
English Standard Version
And no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or to look into it,
Berean Study Bible
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or look inside it.
Berean Literal Bible
And no one in heaven, nor upon the earth, nor under the earth, was able to open the scroll, nor to see it.
New American Standard Bible
And no one in heaven or on the earth or under the earth was able to open the book or to look into it.
King James Bible
And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
But no one in heaven or on earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll or even to look in it.
International Standard Version
Therefore, the verse is not stating that there is no man in heaven, but that no one in heaven, nor on the earth nor under the earth, will be able to open the scroll. In addition, you have 24 elders mention sitting on thrones, which would be referring to resurrected men.
Let's research these things before making these claims, heartofdavid.
The point is,Jesus was THE man ,WORTHY TO OPEN THE SEALS.
I never meant ANY man would open it. I think you are streatching that out for some reason,because It is saying MAN.
Here it is since you seem to want to contend over flyspecks;
[h=2]Transliteration[/h][FONT="]oudeis;[/FONT]
[h=2]Strong's Definitions[/h][FONT="]oo-dice'; including feminine οὐδεμία, oo-dem-ee'ah; and neuter οὐδέν, oo-den'; from (3761) (οὐδέ) and (1520) (εἱ̑ς); not even one (man, woman or thing), i.e. none, nobody, nothing: — any (man), aught, man, neither any (thing), never (man), no (man), none (+ of these things), not (any, at all, thing), nought.
[/FONT]
[h=2]KJV Translation Count — 236x[/h][FONT="]The KJV translates Strongs H1 in the following manner: no man (94), nothing (68), none (27), no (24), any man (3), any (3),man (2), neither any man (2), misc 1(3)
So yes even if you think you corrected me,"no one" or "no man" is still "NO MAN",and ANY STUDY proves that out.
The point is,Jesus is the kinsman redeemer of Ruth.
That is WHY IT HAD TO BE A MAN to open the seals. (our kinsman redeemer.)
Let's research these things before making these claims, heartofdavid
[/FONT]
It is clear "man " is valid.